Identifying Systemically Important Banks: A temporal approach for macroprudential policies

被引:6
|
作者
Spelta, A. [1 ]
Pecora, N. [2 ]
Kaltwasser, P. Rovira [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Human Technopole, Ctr Anal Decis & Soc, Milan, Italy
[2] Catholic Univ, Dept Econ & Social Sci, Piacenza, Italy
[3] Univ Leuven, Dept Econ & Business, Leuven, Belgium
[4] Natl Bank Belgium, Brussels, Belgium
关键词
Tensor decomposition; Early warnings; Evolving networks; Interbank market; Systemically important financial institutions; DECOMPOSITIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpolmod.2018.06.004
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Contrary to the general belief, systemic risk does not only regard the risk posed by balance sheet relationships and interdependencies among institutions. It also features a temporal dimension related to the inappropriate responses of financial market participants to changes in risk over time. This paper proposes a method to simultaneously address the cross-sectional and the time dimension in which systemic risk materializes. The method is based on the TOPHITS algorithm. It provides three scores, namely borrowing, lending and time scores: the first two represent the systemic importance of the borrowing and the lending activity associated with each financial institution,while the third represents an empirical Early Warning Signal of the financial crisis. Our findings reveal that the identification of the time score as an indicator for an incoming market distress could be relevant to design macro prudential policies. (C) 2018 The Society for Policy Modeling. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:197 / 218
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Identifying systemically important financial institutions: a network approach
    Pablo Rovira Kaltwasser
    Alessandro Spelta
    Computational Management Science, 2019, 16 : 155 - 185
  • [12] Interconnected banks and systemically important exposures
    Roncoroni, Alan
    Battiston, Stefano
    D'Errico, Marco
    Halaj, Grzegorz
    Kok, Christoffer
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC DYNAMICS & CONTROL, 2021, 133
  • [13] The triple (T3) dimension of systemic risk: Identifying systemically important banks
    Foglia, Matteo
    Angelini, Eliana
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FINANCE & ECONOMICS, 2021, 26 (01) : 7 - 26
  • [14] The future and dynamics of global systemically important banks
    Moshirian, Fariborz
    JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2012, 36 (10) : 2675 - 2679
  • [15] The Corporate Complexity of Global Systemically Important Banks
    Carmassi, Jacopo
    Herring, Richard
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH, 2016, 49 (2-3) : 175 - 201
  • [16] Determinants of systemically important banks: the case of Europe
    Kleinow, Jacob
    Nell, Tobias
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMIC POLICY, 2015, 7 (04) : 446 - +
  • [17] Measurement of systemically important banks based on size
    Lu, Jing
    Hu, Xiao-Hong
    Xitong Gongcheng Lilun yu Shijian/System Engineering Theory and Practice, 2014, 34 (08): : 1952 - 1962
  • [18] A FEATURE OF THE APPROACHES TO IDENTIFY SYSTEMICALLY IMPORTANT BANKS
    Stegniienko, M. O.
    FINANCIAL AND CREDIT ACTIVITY-PROBLEMS OF THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2015, 2 (19): : 42 - 50
  • [19] The Corporate Complexity of Global Systemically Important Banks
    Jacopo Carmassi
    Richard Herring
    Journal of Financial Services Research, 2016, 49 : 175 - 201
  • [20] Systemic risk prevention policies targeting systemically important banks: Does clustering pattern matter?
    Zhu, Bo
    Hu, Xin
    Deng, Yuanyue
    Lin, Renda
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (04):