Adaptive floating node method for modelling cohesive fracture of composite materials

被引:31
|
作者
Lu, X. [1 ]
Chen, B. Y. [2 ]
Tan, V. B. C. [1 ]
Tay, T. E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Mech Engn, Singapore 117576, Singapore
[2] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Aerosp Engn, NL-2629 HS Delft, Netherlands
关键词
Adaptive modelling; Fracture; Finite element method; Floating node method; DELAMINATION MIGRATION; PROGRESSIVE DELAMINATION; NUMERICAL-SIMULATION; BRIDGED CRACKS; ZONE LENGTH; DAMAGE; PROPAGATION; FAILURE; GROWTH; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.03.011
中图分类号
O3 [力学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0801 ;
摘要
The cohesive element has been widely employed to model delamination and matrix cracking in composite materials. However, an extremely fine mesh along the potential crack path is required to achieve accurate predictions of stresses within the cohesive zone. A sufficient number of cohesive elements must be present within the cohesive zone ahead of the crack tip, resulting in very high computational cost and time for application to practical composite structures. To mitigate this problem, an adaptive floating node method (A-FNM) with potential to reduce model size and computational effort is proposed. An element with adaptive partitioning capabilities is designed such that it can be formulated as a master element, a refined element and a coarsened element, depending on the damage state in the progressive damage process. A relatively coarse overall mesh may be used initially, and by transforming the element configurations adaptively, the local refinement and coarsening schemes are applied in the analysis. The localized stress gradient ahead of the crack front within the refinement zone is captured by the refined elements. The refinement and coarsening operations are performed at the elemental level with fixed nodal connectivity, so that global successive remeshing in adaptive mesh refinement (AMR) techniques is avoided; this is the key difference between AMR and A-FNM. It is demonstrated that, without loss of accuracy, the present method simplifies the modelling procedure and reduces computational cost.
引用
收藏
页码:240 / 261
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A fast multipole hybrid boundary node method for composite materials
    Qiao Wang
    Yu Miao
    Hongping Zhu
    Computational Mechanics, 2013, 51 : 885 - 897
  • [42] Cohesive zone modelling and the fracture process of structural tape
    Stigh, Ulf
    Biel, Anders
    Svensson, Daniel
    21ST EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON FRACTURE, (ECF21), 2016, 2 : 235 - 244
  • [43] A fast multipole hybrid boundary node method for composite materials
    Wang, Qiao
    Miao, Yu
    Zhu, Hongping
    COMPUTATIONAL MECHANICS, 2013, 51 (06) : 885 - 897
  • [44] Modelling of fracture by cohesive force models: A path to pursue
    Marigo, Jean-Jacques
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MECHANICS A-SOLIDS, 2023, 102
  • [45] THREE-DIMENSIONAL FLOATING NODE METHOD FOR MODELLING PROGRESSIVE DAMAGE AND FAILURE IN COMPOSITES
    Chen, Bo-Yang
    Tay, Tong-Earn
    Tan, Vincent B. C.
    20TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPOSITE MATERIALS, 2015,
  • [46] Cohesive interface simulations of indentation cracking as a fracture toughness measurement method for brittle materials
    Lee, J. H.
    Gao, Y. F.
    Johanns, K. E.
    Pharr, G. M.
    ACTA MATERIALIA, 2012, 60 (15) : 5448 - 5467
  • [47] Modelling of adaptive composite materials with embedded shape memory alloy wires
    Stalmans, R
    Delaey, L
    vanHumbeeck, J
    MATERIALS FOR SMART SYSTEMS II, 1997, 459 : 119 - 130
  • [48] 3D numerical modelling of rock fracture with a hybrid finite and cohesive element method
    Jiang, Hongxiang
    Meng, Deguang
    ENGINEERING FRACTURE MECHANICS, 2018, 199 : 280 - 293
  • [49] Adaptive hierarchical refinement of NURBS in cohesive fracture analysis
    Chen, Lin
    Lingen, Erik Jan
    de Borst, Rene
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING, 2017, 112 (13) : 2151 - 2173
  • [50] COHESIVE AND ADHESIVE FRACTURE PATTERNS OF THE COMPOSITE ENAMEL BOND
    DEGROOT, R
    PETERS, MCRB
    PLASSCHAERT, AJM
    CARIES RESEARCH, 1985, 19 (02) : 172 - 172