Limitations of 64-Detector-Row Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography: Calcium and Motion but not Short Experience

被引:11
|
作者
Mir-Akbari, H.
Ripsweden, J.
Jensen, J.
Pichler, P.
Sylven, C.
Cederlund, K.
Ruck, A.
机构
[1] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Div Cardiol, Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Dept Clin Sci Intervent & Technol, Div Radiol, Karolinska Inst, Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Internal Med 2, Vienna, Austria
关键词
Angiography; cardiac; CT angiography; heart; MYOCARDIAL-PERFUSION SCINTIGRAPHY; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE; STABLE ANGINA-PECTORIS; HEART-RATE-VARIABILITY; DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY; ARTERY-DISEASE; INVASIVE ANGIOGRAPHY; CARDIOLOGY SOCIETY; AMERICAN-COLLEGE; CT ANGIOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1080/02841850802647013
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: Recently, 64-detector-row computed tomography coronary angiography (CTA) has been introduced for the noninvasive diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic capacity and limitations of a newly established CTA service. Material and Methods: In 101 outpatients with suspected coronary artery disease, 64-detector-row CTA (VCT Lightspeed 64; GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, Wisc., USA) was performed before invasive coronary angiography (ICA). The presence of 50% diameter coronary stenosis on CTA was rated by two radiologists recently trained in CTA, and separately by an experienced colleague. Diagnostic performance of CTA was calculated on segment, vessel, and patient levels, using ICA as a reference. Segments with a proximal reference diameter 2 mm or with stents were not analyzed. Results: In 51 of 101 patients and 121 of 1280 segments, ICA detected coronary stenosis. In 274 of 1280 (21%) segments, CTA had non-diagnostic image quality, the main reasons being severe calcifications (49%), motion artifacts associated with high or irregular heart rate (45%), and low contrast opacification (14%). Significantly more women (43%) had non-diagnostic scans compared to men (20%). A heart rate above 60 beats per minute was associated with significantly more non-diagnostic patients (38% vs. 18%). In the 1006 diagnostic segments, CTA had a sensitivity of 78%, specificity of 95%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 54%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 98% for detecting significant coronary stenosis. In 29 patients, CTA was non-diagnostic. In the remaining 72 patients, sensitivity was 100%, specificity 65%, PPV 79%, and NPV 100%. The use of a more experienced CTA reader did not improve diagnostic performance. Conclusion: CTA had a very high negative predictive value, but the number of non-diagnostic scans was high, especially in women. The main limitations were motion artifacts and vessel calcifications, while short experience in CTA did not influence the interpretation.
引用
收藏
页码:174 / 180
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Value of 64-row Computed Tomography Angiography in Detecting Coronary Artery Anomalies in Young Asymptomatic Men
    Wang, Yu
    Wu, Bing
    ICIC 2009: SECOND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION AND COMPUTING SCIENCE, VOL 2, PROCEEDINGS: IMAGE ANALYSIS, INFORMATION AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2009, : 228 - +
  • [42] Non-invasive detection of aortic and coronary atherosclerosis in homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia by 64 slice multi-detector row computed tomography angiography
    Santos, Raul D.
    Miname, Marcio H.
    Martinez, Lilton R. C.
    Rochitte, Carlos E.
    Chacra, Ana P. M.
    Nakandakare, Edna R.
    Chen, David
    Schaefer, Ernst J.
    ATHEROSCLEROSIS, 2008, 197 (02) : 910 - 915
  • [43] Detection of myocardial bridging by 64-row computed tomography angiography of the coronaries
    Johansen, Christopher
    Kirsch, Jaeobo
    Araoz, Philip
    Williamson, Eric
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2008, 32 (03) : 448 - 451
  • [44] Uses and limitations of 40 slice multi-detector row spiral computed tomography for diagnosing coronary lesions in unselected patients referred for routine invasive coronary angiography
    Halon, David A.
    Gaspar, Tamar
    Adawi, Salim
    Rubinshtein, Ronen
    Schliamser, Jorge E.
    Peled, Nathan
    Lewis, Basil S.
    CARDIOLOGY, 2007, 108 (03) : 200 - 209
  • [45] PULMONARY ANGIOGRAPHY WITH 64-MULTIDETECTOR-ROW COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY IN NORMAL DOGS
    Drees, Randi
    Frydrychowicz, Alex
    Keuler, Nicholas S.
    Reeder, Scott B.
    Johnson, Rebecca
    VETERINARY RADIOLOGY & ULTRASOUND, 2011, 52 (04) : 362 - 367
  • [46] The value of 64-detector row computed tomography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism
    Pesavento, R.
    De Conti, G.
    Minotto, I
    Maurizi, F.
    Mongiat, M.
    Pagnan, A.
    Prandoni, P.
    JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2009, 7 : 805 - 805
  • [47] The value of 64-detector row computed tomography for the exclusion of pulmonary embolism
    Pesavento, Raffaele
    de Conti, Giorgio
    Minotto, Isabella
    Filippi, Lucia
    Mongiat, Marta
    de Faveri, Daniele
    Maurizi, Francesca
    Dalla Valle, Fabio
    Piovella, Chiara
    Pagnan, Antonio
    Prandoni, Paolo
    THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2011, 105 (05) : 901 - 907
  • [48] Multi Detector-Row Computed Tomography (MDCT) had excellent reproducibility of coronary calcium measurements
    Sabour, S.
    Atsma, F.
    Rutten, A.
    Grobbee, D. E.
    Mali, W.
    Prokop, M.
    Bots, M. L.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2008, 61 (06) : 572 - 579
  • [49] REDUCTION OF RADIATION DOSE OF 320-ROW CORONARY COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY THROUGH PRIOR CORONARY CALCIUM SCANNING
    Dewey, Marc
    Zimmermann, Elke
    Wollenberg, Ulrike
    Rief, Matthias
    Greupner, Johannes
    Hamm, Bernd
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2010, 55 (10)
  • [50] Comparison of the 64-and 80-detector row computed tomography among the CT number and radiation dose during lower extremity computed tomography angiography
    Moriwake, Ryo
    Masuda, Takanori
    Yamamoto, Akira
    Ikenaga, Hiroyuki
    Yoshida, Koji
    Takei, Yasutaka
    Yao, Daiki
    Ono, Atsushi
    Hiratsuka, Junichi
    Tamada, Tsutomu
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2023, 199 (04) : 356 - 362