Comparison of the predictive capability of antral follicle count vs. the anti-Mullerian hormone for ovarian response in infertile women

被引:3
|
作者
Sun, Xingyu [1 ]
Xiong, Wang [1 ]
Liu, Liting [2 ]
Xiong, Junjun [1 ]
Liao, Chenlu [3 ]
Lan, Yunzhu [2 ]
Li, Feifei [2 ]
Tao, Shufei [4 ]
Meng, Muzi [5 ,6 ]
Sun, Chenyu [7 ]
Mao, Xiguang [1 ]
机构
[1] Southwest Med Univ, Affiliated Tradit Chinese Med Hosp, Dept Gynecol, Luzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Southwest Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp, Dept Gynecol, Luzhou, Peoples R China
[3] First Peoples Hosp Neijiang, Dept Ophthalmol, Neijiang, Peoples R China
[4] Carle Fdn Hosp, Family Med, Urbana, IL USA
[5] Amer Univ Caribbean, Sch Med, Preston, England
[6] Bronxcare Hlth Syst, Bronx, NY USA
[7] AMITA Hlth St Joseph Hosp Chicago, Chicago, IL USA
来源
关键词
Anti-Mullerian hormone; Antral follicle count; Female infertility; In vitro fertilization-embryo transfer; Ovarian response; REPRODUCTIVE AGE; RESERVE; EXPRESSION; PREGNANCY; MARKERS;
D O I
10.3389/fendo.2022.862733
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to compare the predictive capability of antral follicle count (AFC) and the anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) on ovarian response in infertile women and to identify potential factors influencing retrieved oocytes. MethodsA total of 2585 infertile women who underwent in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) cycles had been enrolled in this study. Spearman correlation was used to investigate the correlation between retrieved oocytes and AFC. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to study the parameters affecting the number of retrieved oocytes. ResultsSpearman correlation and multiple linear regression analysis revealed that the oocyte retrieval number was positively correlated with AFC (r = 0.651, p < 0.001) and AMH (r = 0.566, p < 0.001) and negatively correlated with age (r = -0.425, p < 0.001) and regimen selection (r = -0.233 p < 0.001). There was no significant correlation between retrieved oocytes and BMI (p = 0.913). ROC analysis revealed that AFC was a better predictor of adverse effects than AMH, BMI, and age (AUC: 0.916 VS 0.791, 0.575, 0.752). Meanwhile, AFC and AMH were comparable in predicting high response (AUC = 0.731 and AUC = 0.733, respectively). ConclusionsThis study showed that retrieved oocytes were positively correlated with serum AMH and AFC and negatively correlated with age and BMI. AFC had an ideal predictive performance in ovarian response prediction. The mechanism of the effect of AFC on ovarian response during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) needs to be further investigated.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Predictive value of anti-mullerian hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone and antral follicle count on the outcome of ovarian stimulation in women following GnRH-antagonist protocol for IVF/ET
    Tsakos, E.
    Tolikas, A.
    Daniilidis, Angelos
    Asimakopoulos, B.
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2014, 290 (06) : 1249 - 1253
  • [22] Follicle stimulating hormone and antral follicle count in combination better predicts live birth rate than anti-Mullerian hormone in women with diminished ovarian reserve
    Goswami, S. K.
    Chakraborty, P.
    Ghosh, S.
    Chattopadhyay, R.
    Chakravarty, B. N.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2015, 30 : 435 - 435
  • [23] Antral follicle count and anti-Mullerian hormone level as predictors of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation
    Izhar, Rubina
    Husain, Samia
    Tahir, Muhammad Ahmad
    Kausar, Mauzma
    Sana, Tanveer
    Ghalib, Farrah
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASONOGRAPHY, 2021, 21 (86) : E200 - E205
  • [24] The effect of selenium and vitamin E supplementation on anti-Mullerian hormone and antral follicle count in infertile women with occult premature ovarian insufficiency: A randomized controlled clinical trial
    Safiyeh, Farhadi Dizaji
    Mojgan, Mirghafourvand
    Parviz, Shahabi
    Sakineh, Mohammad Alizadeh
    Behnaz, Sadeghzadeh Oskouei
    COMPLEMENTARY THERAPIES IN MEDICINE, 2021, 56
  • [25] The use of anti-Mullerian hormone and antral follicle count to predict the potential of oocytes and embryos
    Majumder, Kingshuk
    Gelbaya, Tarek A.
    Laing, Ian
    Nardo, Luciano G.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2010, 150 (02) : 166 - 170
  • [26] Anti-Mullerian hormone versus antral follicle count for defining the starting dose of FSH
    Vuong Thi Ngoc Lan
    Nguyen Khanh Linh
    Ho Manh Tuong
    Wong, P. C.
    Howles, Colin M.
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2013, 27 (04) : 390 - 399
  • [27] Does an endometrioma instigate an antral follicle count underestimation or anti-Mullerian hormone overestimation?
    Younis, Johnny S.
    Izhaki, Ido
    Nelson, Scott M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 227 (02) : 367 - 367
  • [28] INDIVIDUAL IVF CLINIC PERFORMANCE OF ANTI-MULLERIAN HORMONE AND ANTRAL FOLLICLE COUNT AS BIOMARKERS OF OVARIAN RESPONSE TO CONTROLLED OVARIAN STIMULATION IN MULTICENTRE TRIALS
    Nelson, S.
    Arce, J. -C.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2014, 102 (03) : E147 - E147
  • [29] A multicentre evaluation of the Elecsys® anti-Mullerian hormone immunoassay for prediction of antral follicle count
    Jacobs, Michael H.
    Reuter, Laura M.
    Baker, Valerie L.
    Craig, LaTasha B.
    Sakkas, Denny
    Surrey, Eric
    Doody, Kevin J.
    Jungheim, Emily S.
    Bayrak, Aykut B.
    Hund, Martin
    Verhagen-Kamerbeek, Wilma D. J.
    Pardue, Deborah
    Buck, Katharina
    Timm, Barbara
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2019, 38 (05) : 845 - 852
  • [30] Assessment of ovarian reserve with anti-Mullerian hormone: a comparison of the predictive value of anti-Mullerian hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, inhibin B, and age
    Riggs, Ryan M.
    Duran, E. Hakan
    Baker, Margaret W.
    Kimble, Thomas D.
    Hobeika, Elie
    Yin, Larry
    Matos-Bodden, Lira
    Leader, Ben
    Stadtmauer, Laurel
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 199 (02) : 202.e1 - 202.e8