Do Participants Change Their Preferences in the Deliberative Process?

被引:2
|
作者
Ganuza, Ernesto [1 ]
Frances, Francisco [2 ]
Lafuente, Regina [1 ]
Garrido, Fernando [1 ]
机构
[1] CSIC, Inst Estudios Sociales Avanzados, Madrid, Spain
[2] Univ Alicante, Alicante, Spain
关键词
Deliberative Forum; Attitude Measures; Democracy; Political Efficacy; DEMOCRACY; CITIZENS;
D O I
10.5477/cis/reis.139.111
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
This paper analyzes the way participants change their mind in a deliberative forum. Its contribution lies in studying the extent to which these changes persist over time. We start from Mackie's assumption that changes of opinion in a deliberative context cannot be interpreted by considering isolated variables, but must be based on individual attitudinal networks in which preferences are embedded. The results show that certain changes after deliberation are not maintained by some individuals. The paper details the importance of certain variables in the change of opinion in the short and long term, as well as the relationship that exists between different attitudes (information, preferences, beliefs and political efficacy) at three different times before and after deliberation.
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 132
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Problematic Participants in Deliberative Democracy: Experts, Social Movements, and Environmental Justice
    Baber, Walter F.
    Bartlett, Robert V.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2007, 30 (01) : 5 - 22
  • [22] Deliberative Breakdowns in the Social Representation Process
    Purao, Sandeep
    Murungi, David M.
    Yates, David
    ACM Transactions on Social Computing, 2021, 4 (02)
  • [23] How Do Elected Officials Evaluate Performance? Goal Preferences, Governance Preferences, and the Process of Goal Reprioritization
    Christensen, Julian
    Dahlmann, Casper Mondrup
    Mathiasen, Asbjorn Hovgaard
    Moynihan, Donald P.
    Petersen, Niels Bjorn Grund
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY, 2018, 28 (02) : 197 - 211
  • [24] A Case Study Investigating the Influence of Deliberative Discussion on Environmental Preferences
    Walton, Marsha L.
    SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 2013, 26 (03) : 303 - 324
  • [25] SUSTAINED DISSENT AND THE EXTENDED DELIBERATIVE PROCESS
    Heintz, Jon G.
    NOTRE DAME LAW REVIEW, 2013, 88 (04) : 1939 - 1990
  • [26] United for Change: Deliberative Coalition Formation to Change the Status Quo
    Elkind, Edith
    Grossi, Davide
    Shapiro, Ehud
    Talmon, Nimrod
    THIRTY-FIFTH AAAI CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, THIRTY-THIRD CONFERENCE ON INNOVATIVE APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND THE ELEVENTH SYMPOSIUM ON EDUCATIONAL ADVANCES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2021, 35 : 5339 - 5346
  • [27] United for change: deliberative coalition formation to change the status quo
    Elkind, Edith
    Grossi, Davide
    Shapiro, Ehud
    Talmon, Nimrod
    SOCIAL CHOICE AND WELFARE, 2024, 63 (3-4) : 717 - 746
  • [28] How do symptoms change? Accounts from participants attending a food intolerance clinic
    Pope, J.
    Coyle, A.
    Ogden, J.
    PSYCHOLOGY & HEALTH, 2008, 23 : 213 - 213
  • [29] Hormonal status and gender identity do not change aesthetic preferences for top surgery
    Rahmani, Benjamin
    Park, John B.
    Adebagbo, Oluwaseun D.
    Tobin, Micaela
    Raquepo, Tricia Mae
    Yamin, Mohammed
    Foppiani, Jose A.
    Lee, Daniela
    Escobar-Domingo, Maria J.
    Tobias, Adam M.
    Cauley, Ryan P.
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2025, 100 : 170 - 173
  • [30] DO PREFERENCES FOR WOOD-FRAMED HOUSES' ATTRIBUTES CHANGE OVER TIME?
    Kaputa, Vladislav
    Olsiakova, Miriam
    Mat'ova, Hana
    Drlickova, Eva
    DIGITALISATION AND CIRCULAR ECONOMY: FORESTRY AND FORESTRY BASED INDUSTRY IMPLICATIONS, 2019, : 161 - 168