Measurement of LDL-C after treatment with the CETP inhibitor anacetrapib

被引:46
|
作者
Davidson, Michael [1 ]
Liu, Sherry Xueyu [2 ]
Barter, Philip [3 ]
Brinton, Eliot A. [4 ,5 ]
Cannon, Christopher P. [6 ]
Gotto, Antonio M., Jr. [7 ]
Leary, Elizabeth T. [8 ]
Shah, Sukrut [2 ]
Stepanavage, Michael [2 ]
Mitchel, Yale [2 ]
Dansky, Hayes M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Pritzker Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp, Whitehouse Stn, NJ USA
[3] Heart Res Inst, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Utah Fdn Biomed Res, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[5] Univ Utah, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[6] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Cardiovasc, TIMI Study Grp, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[7] Weill Cornell Med Coll, New York, NY USA
[8] Pacific Biomarkers, Seattle, WA USA
关键词
Friedewald formula; beta quantification; VLDL cholesterol; HDL cholesterol; direct method; low density lipoprotein cholesterol; cholesteryl ester transfer protein; DENSITY-LIPOPROTEIN CHOLESTEROL; INTEGRATED APPROACH; FAT TRANSPORT; HEALTHY-INDIVIDUALS; MECHANISMS; DISORDERS; DISEASE; RISK; GUIDELINES; HDL;
D O I
10.1194/jlr.M032615
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Estimation of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) using the Friedewald (FR) formula is often inaccurate when triglycerides are elevated or VLDL particle composition is altered. We hypothesized that LDL-C estimation by the FR formula and other measurement methods might also be inaccurate in individuals treated with a cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitor. An assay comparison study was conducted using pre and posttreatment serum samples from 280 of the 811 patients treated with the CETP inhibitor anacetrapib in the DEFINE study (determining the efficacy and tolerability of CETP inhibition with anacetrapib). After 24 weeks of treatment with anacetrapib, mean LDL-C values by FR formula, Roche direct method (RDM) and Genzyme direct method (GDM) deviated from that measured by the beta-quantification (BQ) reference method by -12.2 +/- 7.5, -10.2 +/- 6.6, -10.8 +/- 8.8 mg/dl, respectively.(jlr) After treatment with anacetrapib, the FR formula and detergent-based direct methods provided lower LDL-C values than those obtained by the BQ reference method. The bias by the FR formula appeared to be due to an overestimation of VLDL-C by the TG/5 component of the formula. Evaluation of the clinical significance of these findings awaits comprehensive lipid and cardiovascular outcome data from ongoing Phase III clinical studies of anacetrapib.-Davidson, M., S. X. Liu, P. Barter, E. A. Brinton, C. P. Cannon, A. M. Gotto, Jr., E. T. Leary, S. Shah, M. Stepanavage, Y. Mitchel, and H. M. Dansky. Measurement of LDL-C after treatment with the CETP inhibitor anacetrapib. J. Lipid Res. 2013. 54: 467-472.
引用
收藏
页码:467 / 472
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] REMOVING THE LIPOPROTEIN(A)-CHOLESTEROL FROM THE LDL-C MEASUREMENT RESULTS IN A 38% REDUCTION IN PREVALENCE OF ELEVATED LDL-C AT ANY THRESHOLD: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PREVALENCE AND DIAGNOSIS OF LDL-MEDIATED RISK
    Moriarty, Patrick M.
    Yeang, Calvin
    Varvel, Stephen A.
    McConnell, Joseph P.
    Tsimikas, Sotirios
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 71 (11) : 1783 - 1783
  • [32] THE RELATIONS AMONG SMALL AND DENSE LDL-C, TG, LDL-C, NON-HDL-C AND BCL SCORE
    Omi, T.
    ATHEROSCLEROSIS, 2020, 315 : E157 - E157
  • [33] Sex Differences in Lipid Measurement, LDL-C Goal Attainment, and Prescribing Practices
    Vartak, Natasha
    Weintraub, Spencer
    Huang, Xueqi
    Ong, Caroline
    Fishbein, Joanna
    Parikh, Nisha
    Rosen, Stacey
    Gianos, Eugenia
    CIRCULATION, 2024, 150
  • [34] Magic mirror on the wall, can we reach our LDL-C goal? Comparison of calculated LDL-C and direct measured LDL-C levels in atherogenic dyslipidemia condition
    Reiber, I.
    Mark, L.
    Paragh, G. Y.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2019, 40 : 3229 - 3229
  • [35] Reducing LDL-C - Treating to target
    Kritharides, L
    ATHEROSCLEROSIS SUPPLEMENTS, 2003, 4 (02) : 94 - 94
  • [36] Is very low LDL-C harmful?
    Faselis, Charles
    Imprialos, Konstantinos
    Grassos, Haris
    Pittaras, Andreas
    Kallistratos, Manolis
    Manolis, Athanasios
    CURRENT PHARMACEUTICAL DESIGN, 2018, 24 (31) : 3658 - 3664
  • [37] Calculated LDL-C: Time to Move On?
    Cartier, Louis-Jacques
    Chen, Yu
    Canales, Donaldo D.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2023, 39 (03) : 353 - 354
  • [38] Achievement of ESC/EAS LDL-C treatment goals after an acute coronary syndrome with statin and alirocumab
    Landmesser, Ulf
    McGinniss, Jennifer
    Steg, Ph Gabriel
    Bhatt, Deepak L.
    Bittner, Vera A.
    Diaz, Rafael
    Dilic, Mirza
    Goodman, Shaun G.
    Jukema, J. Wouter
    Loy, Megan
    Pecin, Ivan
    Pordy, Robert
    Poulsen, Steen H.
    Szarek, Michael
    White, Harvey D.
    Schwartz, Gregory G.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 29 (14) : 1842 - 1851
  • [39] Adding ezetimibe to statin treatment: is LDL-C lowering the only benefit?
    Kostapanos, Michael S.
    Mikhailidis, Dimitri P.
    Elisaf, Moses S.
    FUTURE CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 8 (06) : 813 - 817
  • [40] Determinants of prevalence, awareness, treatment and control of high LDL-C in Turkey
    Sozmen, Kaan
    Unal, Belgin
    Sakarya, Sibel
    Dinc, Gonul
    Yardim, Nazan
    Keskinkilic, Bekir
    Ergor, Gul
    ANATOLIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 16 (06): : 370 - 384