Living Kidney Transplantation From Marginal Donors Presents Feasible Donor Renal Function Despite Inferior Recipient Renal Function

被引:8
|
作者
Hamano, Itsuto [1 ]
Hatakeyama, Shingo [1 ,2 ]
Fujita, Takeshi [3 ]
Murakami, Reiichi [3 ]
Hamaya, Tomoko [1 ]
Togashi, Kyo [1 ]
Suzuki, Yuichiro [1 ]
Yamamoto, Hayato [1 ]
Yoneyama, Tohru [4 ]
Yoneyama, Takahiro [4 ]
Hashimoto, Yasuhiro [1 ]
Narumi, Shunji [5 ]
Tomita, Hirofumi [3 ]
Ohyama, Chikara [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Hirosaki Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Urol, 5 Zaifu Chou, Hirosaki, Aomori 0368562, Japan
[2] Dept Adv Blood Purificat Therapy, Hirosaki, Aomori, Japan
[3] Hirosaki Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Cardiol & Nephrol, Hirosaki, Aomori, Japan
[4] Hirosaki Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Adv Transplant & Regenerat Med, Hirosaki, Aomori, Japan
[5] Nagoya Daini Red Cross Hosp, Dept Transplant Surg, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
LONG-TERM OUTCOMES; EXPANDED CRITERIA;
D O I
10.1016/j.transproceed.2020.01.157
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Introduction. Kidney transplantation from marginal donors is an important solution for organ shortage problems. In this study, we evaluated the safety and effectiveness of living kidney transplantation from marginal donors at our hospitals. Methods. Between June 2006 and April 2019, 107 patients underwent living kidney transplantation at our hospitals. Marginal donors were defined as those with 1. age >70 years, 2. hypertension, 3. creatinine clearance <80 mL/min, 4. body mass index >30 kg/m(2), or 5. hemoglobin A1c >6.2%. We retrospectively compared renal function and its chronological changes between marginal and standard donors. We also compared graft survival and recipient renal function between the groups. Results. Thirty-one (29%) donors were defined as marginal. The primary reason for being defined as marginal was hypertension (74%). The mean age of the marginal donors (62 +/- 10 years) was higher than that of standard donors (52 +/- 12 years, P < .001). The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) before and after transplantation was lower in the marginal group, whereas the decline ratio of eGFR was not different between the marginal and standard donors. Five-year graft survival of transplantations from marginal donors (89%) was not significantly inferior to that from standard donors (95%). Meanwhile, recipient eGFR was lower in transplantation from marginal donors than standard donors from 1 month through 5 years after transplantation. Conclusions. No significant differences were observed between the groups regarding the decline ratios of donor eGFR and graft survival. Thus, transplantation from marginal donors may be a feasible solution for donor shortage problems.
引用
收藏
页码:1723 / 1728
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Donor smoking negatively impacts living donor and recipient renal function
    Lindler, Tekisha U.
    Mclarty, Justin D.
    Lamberton, Gregory R.
    Harper, Jonathan D.
    Ojogho, Okechukwu N.
    Baron, Pedro W.
    Baldwin, D. Duane
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 179 (04): : 693 - 694
  • [22] Outcome and renal function of elderly donors after living donor kidney transplantation: A single center cohort study
    Gero, D.
    Melloul, E.
    Demartines, N.
    Matter, M.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2014, 101 : 5 - 6
  • [23] Evaluation of renal function in potential living kidney donors
    Bertolatus, JA
    Goddard, L
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2001, 71 (02) : 256 - 260
  • [24] Impact of marginal donor to marginal recipient kidney transplantation on delayed graft function and outcome
    Bocchi, Federica
    Kuhn, Christian
    Mueller, Natalie
    Storni, Federico
    Beldi, Guido
    Sidler, Daniel
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2022, 152 : 10S - 10S
  • [25] Expanding the living related donor pool in renal transplantation: Use of marginal donors
    Kumar, A
    Mandhani, A
    Verma, BS
    Srivastava, A
    Gupta, A
    Sharma, RK
    Bhandari, M
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2000, 163 (01): : 33 - 36
  • [26] Expanding the living related donor pool in renal transplantation: Use of marginal donors
    Kumar, A
    Das, SK
    Srivastava, A
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2003, 35 (01) : 28 - 29
  • [27] Impact of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning Conducted in Living Kidney Donors on Renal Function in Donors and Recipients Following Living Donor Kidney Transplantation: A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Bang, Ji-Yeon
    Kim, Sae-Gyeol
    Oh, Jimi
    Kim, Seon-Ok
    Go, Yon-Ji
    Hwang, Gyu-Sam
    Song, Jun-Gol
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2019, 8 (05)
  • [28] Living-Donor Kidney Transplantation: Donor-Recipient Function Correlation
    Godinho, I.
    Guerra, J.
    Melo, M. J.
    Neves, M.
    Goncalves, J.
    Sahtana, M. A.
    Gomes da Costa, A.
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2018, 50 (03) : 719 - 722
  • [29] CLINICAL OUTCOMES OF LIVING DONOR KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION FROM MARGINAL DONORS
    Kinoshita, Yoshitaka
    Yagisawa, Takashi
    Sugihara, Toru
    Takeshima, Saki
    Kubo, Taro
    Shinzato, Takahiro
    Shimizu, Toshihiro
    Kamei, Jun
    Akira, Fujisaki
    Ando, Satoshi
    Suzuki, Motofumi
    Kume, Haruki
    Fujimura, Tetsuya
    NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2020, 35 : 1964 - 1964
  • [30] The impact of cortex recipient weight ratio on the short-term renal function after a living donor kidney transplantation
    Takahashi, Kazuhiro
    Kaneko, Shuzo
    Usui, Joichi
    Furuya, Kinji
    Kimura, Tomokazu
    Fukuda, Shoichi
    Hoshi, Akio
    Nishiyama, Hiroyuki
    Oda, Tatsuya
    Yamagata, Kunihiro
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2021, 21 : 26 - 26