共 50 条
Living Kidney Transplantation From Marginal Donors Presents Feasible Donor Renal Function Despite Inferior Recipient Renal Function
被引:8
|作者:
Hamano, Itsuto
[1
]
Hatakeyama, Shingo
[1
,2
]
Fujita, Takeshi
[3
]
Murakami, Reiichi
[3
]
Hamaya, Tomoko
[1
]
Togashi, Kyo
[1
]
Suzuki, Yuichiro
[1
]
Yamamoto, Hayato
[1
]
Yoneyama, Tohru
[4
]
Yoneyama, Takahiro
[4
]
Hashimoto, Yasuhiro
[1
]
Narumi, Shunji
[5
]
Tomita, Hirofumi
[3
]
Ohyama, Chikara
[1
,3
]
机构:
[1] Hirosaki Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Urol, 5 Zaifu Chou, Hirosaki, Aomori 0368562, Japan
[2] Dept Adv Blood Purificat Therapy, Hirosaki, Aomori, Japan
[3] Hirosaki Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Cardiol & Nephrol, Hirosaki, Aomori, Japan
[4] Hirosaki Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Adv Transplant & Regenerat Med, Hirosaki, Aomori, Japan
[5] Nagoya Daini Red Cross Hosp, Dept Transplant Surg, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
基金:
日本学术振兴会;
关键词:
LONG-TERM OUTCOMES;
EXPANDED CRITERIA;
D O I:
10.1016/j.transproceed.2020.01.157
中图分类号:
R392 [医学免疫学];
Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号:
100102 ;
摘要:
Introduction. Kidney transplantation from marginal donors is an important solution for organ shortage problems. In this study, we evaluated the safety and effectiveness of living kidney transplantation from marginal donors at our hospitals. Methods. Between June 2006 and April 2019, 107 patients underwent living kidney transplantation at our hospitals. Marginal donors were defined as those with 1. age >70 years, 2. hypertension, 3. creatinine clearance <80 mL/min, 4. body mass index >30 kg/m(2), or 5. hemoglobin A1c >6.2%. We retrospectively compared renal function and its chronological changes between marginal and standard donors. We also compared graft survival and recipient renal function between the groups. Results. Thirty-one (29%) donors were defined as marginal. The primary reason for being defined as marginal was hypertension (74%). The mean age of the marginal donors (62 +/- 10 years) was higher than that of standard donors (52 +/- 12 years, P < .001). The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) before and after transplantation was lower in the marginal group, whereas the decline ratio of eGFR was not different between the marginal and standard donors. Five-year graft survival of transplantations from marginal donors (89%) was not significantly inferior to that from standard donors (95%). Meanwhile, recipient eGFR was lower in transplantation from marginal donors than standard donors from 1 month through 5 years after transplantation. Conclusions. No significant differences were observed between the groups regarding the decline ratios of donor eGFR and graft survival. Thus, transplantation from marginal donors may be a feasible solution for donor shortage problems.
引用
收藏
页码:1723 / 1728
页数:6
相关论文