Awareness, attitudes and perspectives of direct-to-consumer genetic testing in Greece: a survey of potential consumers

被引:16
|
作者
Mavroidopoulou, Vasiliki [1 ]
Xera, Ellie [1 ]
Mollaki, Vasiliki [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Technol Educ Inst Athens, Fac Hlth & Caring Profess, Dept Med Labs, Athens, Greece
[2] Hellen Natl Bioeth Commiss, Athens 10674, Greece
关键词
EXPERIENCES; GENOMICS;
D O I
10.1038/jhg.2015.58
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Direct-to-consumer genetic testing (DTCGT) is now offered by numerous companies. The present survey aimed to explore awareness, interest, reasons to take and refuse DTCGT, and understanding of results amongst 725 higher education students in Greece. A third of the responders were aware of DTCGT and interest was dependent on cost. More than 60% of the participants would undergo DTCGT to learn more about their health, to warn their children, so that their doctor can monitor their health and change their lifestyle. Nevertheless, they would prefer to consult their doctor first and expressed concerned about their personal data. After receiving results from a hypothetical DTC genetic test predicting higher risk for colon cancer, 59.5% of the responders thought that they could understand the results but 46.1% believed that the results have diagnostic value. In total, 83.6% of the participants would ask their doctor to explain the results and 70.4% would discuss results with their family. In conclusion, the majority of higher education students in Greece appreciate the benefits of genetic testing but with the involvement of their doctor. A physician's participation in the process and informing the public about the true value of genetic testing, are crucial to avoid misinterpretation of DTCGT results.
引用
收藏
页码:515 / 523
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Direct-to-consumer genetic laboratory testing
    Popovich, Bradley
    CYTOGENETIC AND GENOME RESEARCH, 2007, 116 (04)
  • [22] Direct-to-consumer advertising of genetic testing
    Levin, M
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2003, 289 (01): : 45 - 46
  • [23] The ethics of direct-to-consumer genetic testing
    Udesky, Laurie
    LANCET, 2010, 376 (9750): : 1377 - 1378
  • [24] Privacy in Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing
    Park, Jason Y.
    Risher, Michael T.
    Caulfield, Timothy
    Baudhuin, Linnea M.
    Schwab, Abraham P.
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2019, 65 (05) : 612 - 617
  • [25] Impact of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing
    Mahon, Suzanne M.
    JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2012, 8 (04) : 260 - 260
  • [26] Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing and Potential Loopholes in Protecting Consumer Privacy and Nondiscrimination
    Hendricks-Sturrup, Rachele M.
    Prince, Anya E. R.
    Lu, Christine Y.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2019, 321 (19): : 1869 - 1870
  • [27] Primary Care Physicians' Awareness, Experience and Opinions of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing
    Powell, Karen P.
    Cogswell, Whitney A.
    Christianson, Carol A.
    Dave, Gaurav
    Verma, Amit
    Eubanks, Sonja
    Henrich, Vincent C.
    JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING, 2012, 21 (01) : 113 - 126
  • [28] Direct-to-consumer testing: if consumers are not anxious, why are policymakers?
    Caulfield, Timothy
    HUMAN GENETICS, 2011, 130 (01) : 23 - 25
  • [29] Public Perspectives on Direct-to-Consumer Testing Oversight
    Jiang, Sharon
    Lebo, David
    Schultz, Thomas
    THERAPEUTIC INNOVATION & REGULATORY SCIENCE, 2024, 58 (06) : 1027 - 1030
  • [30] Direct-to-consumer testing: if consumers are not anxious, why are policymakers?
    Timothy Caulfield
    Human Genetics, 2011, 130 : 23 - 25