Image quality measures for predicting automatic target recognition performance

被引:0
|
作者
Chen, Yin [1 ]
Chen, Genshe [1 ]
Blum, Rick S. [2 ]
Blasch, Erik [3 ]
Lynch, Robert S. [4 ]
机构
[1] Intelligent Automat Inc, 15400 Calhoun Dr, Rockville, MD 20855 USA
[2] Lehigh Univ, Bethlehem, PA 18015 USA
[3] Air Force Res Lab, Wright Patterson AFB, OH 45433 USA
[4] Naval Undersea Warfare Ctr, Newport, RI 02841 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
One important issue for Automatic Target Recognition (ATR) systems is to learn how robust the performance is under different scenarios. The quality of the input image sequence is a major factor affecting the ATR algorithm's ability to detect and recognize an object. If one can correlate the algorithm performance with different image quality measures, the recognition confidence can be predicted before applying ATR by predetermining the input, image quality. In this paper, we address the utility of image quality measures and their correlations with performance failures of a principle component analysis (PCA) based ATR algorithm. Various image fusion approaches are examined to illustrate their abilities to improve ATR performance. Results show that the Shift Invariant Discrete Wavelet Transform (SiDWT) and Laplacian pyramid fusion schemes outperform other methods for improving the detection rate with the considered SAR images. Regression analysis is conducted to show that linear combinations of the selected image quality measures could explain about 60% of the variability in the non-detections of the ATR algorithm.(12).
引用
收藏
页码:1957 / +
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Image Fusion for Context-Aided Automatic Target Recognition
    Blasch, Erik
    Liu, Zheng
    Zheng, Yufeng
    AUTOMATIC TARGET RECOGNITION XXX, 2020, 11394
  • [32] Image super-resolution for improved automatic target recognition
    Wagner, RS
    Waagen, D
    Cassabaum, M
    AUTOMATIC TARGET RECOGNITION XIV, 2004, 5426 : 188 - 196
  • [33] Association-based image retrieval for automatic target recognition
    Kulkarni, Arun
    Gunturu, Harikrisha
    Datla, Srikanth
    ADVANCES ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING AND DATA BASES, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, : 214 - +
  • [34] Redefining Automatic Target Recognition (ATR) Performance Standards
    Waagen, Donald
    Hester, Charles
    Schmid, Ben
    Phillips, Margaret
    Thompson, M. Shane
    Vanstone, Steven
    Risko, Kelly
    AUTOMATIC TARGET RECOGNITION XXI, 2011, 8049
  • [35] Assessing the performance of a covert automatic target recognition algorithm
    Ehrman, LM
    Lanterman, AD
    Automatic Target Recogniton XV, 2005, 5807 : 77 - 87
  • [36] Method of automatic target recognition algorithm performance evaluation
    Xiong, Yan
    Zhang, Guilin
    Peng, Jiaxiong
    Zidonghua Xuebao/Acta Automatica Sinica, 1996, 22 (02): : 190 - 195
  • [37] Automatic measures for predicting performance in off-line signature
    Alonso-Fernandez, F.
    Fairhurst, M. C.
    Fierrez, J.
    Ortega-Garcia, J.
    2007 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON IMAGE PROCESSING, VOLS 1-7, 2007, : 369 - +
  • [38] AUTOMATIC TARGET RECOGNITION
    SADJADI, FA
    OPTICAL ENGINEERING, 1992, 31 (12) : 2519 - 2520
  • [39] Unification of automatic target tracking and automatic target recognition
    Schachter, Bruce J.
    AUTOMATIC TARGET RECOGNITION XXIV, 2014, 9090
  • [40] Predicting automatic speech recognition performance using prosodic cues
    Litman, DJ
    Hirschberg, JB
    Swerts, M
    6TH APPLIED NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING CONFERENCE/1ST MEETING OF THE NORTH AMERICAN CHAPTER OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS, PROCEEDINGS OF THE CONFERENCE AND PROCEEDINGS OF THE ANLP-NAACL 2000 STUDENT RESEARCH WORKSHOP, 2000, : A218 - A225