Genotoxicity biomarkers in aquatic bioindicators

被引:109
|
作者
Bolognesi, Claudia [1 ]
Cirillo, Silvia [1 ]
机构
[1] IRCCS Azienda Osped Univ San Martino IST, Ist Nazl Ric Cancro, Environm Carcinogenesis Unit, Genoa, Italy
关键词
Aquatic animals; Genotoxicity; Bioindicator; Biomarker; Micronucleus test; Comet assay; Bivalve; Mussel; MUSSELS MYTILUS-EDULIS; DNA STRAND BREAKAGE; ACETYLCHOLINESTERASE ACTIVITY; REPRODUCTION IMPAIRMENT; LYSOSOMAL STABILITY; COASTAL ECOSYSTEMS; GAMMARUS FOSSARUM; HEPATIC NEOPLASMS; MICRONUCLEUS TEST; GENETIC-DAMAGE;
D O I
10.1093/czoolo/60.2.273
中图分类号
Q95 [动物学];
学科分类号
071002 ;
摘要
Pollution of the aquatic environment is an ever-growing problem, as waters are the ultimate sink for the large number of xenobiotics from multiple sources. DNA damaging agents have a significant ecological relevance since they are implicated in many pathological processes and exert effects beyond that of individual being active through following generations. A large number of methods have been applied to evaluate genotoxic damage in different aquatic species. Comet assay, as method for detecting DNA alterations, and micronucleus test, as an index of chromosomal damage are the most widely applied and validated methods in field studies. These methods were applied in different vertebrate and invertebrate aquatic species, but only mollusk and fish species have been employed in routine biomonitoring programs. Mussels, due to their widely geographical distribution and the suitability for caging represent the bioindicator of choice in field studies. Mytilus species is the most used marine mussel. The use of fish is limited to specific geographic areas. The present review mainly focuses on the application of comet assay and micronucleus test in mussels. A number of biomonitoring studies in mussels, using comet assay or micronucleus test, revealed exposure to different classes of genotoxic compounds with a good discrimination power. The different evidence from the two assays, reflects different biological mechanisms for the two genetic endpoints, DNA damage and chromosomal damage, suggesting their combined application in the field. Different endogenous and exogenous factors have been shown to modulate the genotoxic responses in mussels, acting as confounding factors in environmental monitoring. The use of standardized protocol for caging, sampling and genotoxity evaluation is critical in biomonitoring studies. The use of a multimarker approach coupling genotoxicity biomarkers with physiological and biochemical factors allows to have a complete picture of the environmental pollution
引用
收藏
页码:273 / 284
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Aquatic macroinvertebrates as water quality bioindicators in Chicu river, Cundinamarca, Colombia
    Teresa Rincon-Bello, Maria
    Yesid Soler-Romero, Fabian
    Calderon-Rivera, Dayam Soret
    Jackson Sierra-Parade, Ronal
    Maria Jaramillo-Londono, Angela
    HIDROBIOLOGICA, 2021, 31 (01): : 17 - 29
  • [32] The use of fish parasites as bioindicators of heavy metals in aquatic ecosystems: A review
    Sures B.
    Aquatic Ecology, 2001, 35 (2) : 245 - 255
  • [33] Toxic potential of sewage sludge: Histopathological effects on soil and aquatic bioindicators
    Souza, Tatiana da Silva
    Lacerda, Diego
    Aguiar, Luara Louzada
    Correa Martins, Maria Nilza
    de Oliveira David, Jose Augusto
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2020, 111
  • [34] Evaluation of herbicides action on plant bioindicators by genetic biomarkers: a review
    Cleiton Pereira de Souza
    Thays de Andrade Guedes
    Carmem Silvia Fontanetti
    Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2016, 188
  • [35] Biomarkers and bioindicators in vertebrates: importance in evaluation of quality of an ecosystem.
    Lessire, F
    Delaunois, A
    Gustin, P
    Ansay, M
    ANNALES DE MEDECINE VETERINAIRE, 1997, 141 (04) : 281 - 290
  • [36] AQUATIC GENOTOXICITY TESTING WITH RAT HEPATOCYTES IN PRIMARY CULTURE
    ECKL, PM
    ANDERSONCARNAHAN, L
    JIRTLE, RL
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1991, 201 : 114 - ENVR
  • [37] AQUATIC BRYOPHYTES AS BIOINDICATORS OF ARSENIC MINERALIZATION IN POLISH AND CZECH SUDETY MOUNTAINS
    SAMECKACYMERMAN, A
    KEMPERS, AJ
    JOURNAL OF GEOCHEMICAL EXPLORATION, 1994, 51 (03) : 291 - 297
  • [38] Cytogenetic evaluation of aquatic genotoxicity in human cultured lymphocytes
    de Lemos, CT
    Erdtmann, B
    MUTATION RESEARCH-GENETIC TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MUTAGENESIS, 2000, 467 (01) : 1 - 9
  • [39] Evaluation of herbicides action on plant bioindicators by genetic biomarkers: a review
    de Souza, Cleiton Pereira
    Guedes, Thays de Andrade
    Fontanetti, Carmem Silvia
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2016, 188 (12)
  • [40] Spectroscopic analyses and genotoxicity of dioxins in the aquatic environment of Alexandria
    Abdel-Gawad, Fagr Kh.
    Osman, Osama
    Bassem, Samah M.
    Nassar, Hossam F.
    Temraz, Tarek A.
    Elhaes, Hanan
    Ibrahim, Medhat
    MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2018, 127 : 618 - 625