EU Innovation Policy: Changes and New Approaches in Procter & Gamble

被引:0
|
作者
Skoda, Miroslav [1 ]
Bockova, Katerina [1 ]
Vanickova, Radka [2 ]
机构
[1] DTI Univ, Dept Management & Econ, Sladkovicova 553-20, Dubnica Nad Vahom 01841, Slovakia
[2] Inst Technol & Business Ceske Budejovice, Fac Corp Strategy, Dept Management, Okruzni 517-10, Ceske Budejovice 37001, Czech Republic
关键词
changes and new approaches; EU innovation policy; innovation process; Procter & Gamble; SUSTAINABILITY; STRATEGIES; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ;
摘要
The aim of the paper is to find out whether the intensity and effectiveness of innovation contributes to measuring creativity and innovative approaches to the company portfolio. In contribution was presented the innovation policy EU, new approaches and innovation changes in Procter & Gamble. The study is divided into two specific parts - the theoretical and the analytical part - in order to verb stated hypothesis that stands: The use of complex system of innovation evaluation contributes to the successful product implementation. The following methods were used in the theoretical and analytical part to analyse the present contribution: analysis, synthesis, comparison, observation, questionnaire and interview. Basing on the results of the analysis, it can be concluded that the hypothesis has been verified. Without the complex evaluation system, the probably time-to-market indicator of the newly developed or innovated products/services would be continuously increasing alongside with the amount of innovative ideas, as the consideration in terms of one metrics are not sufficient for the purposes of innovation potential which is conditioned by the quality of human resources and the organization's capability to run more parallel innovative international projects.
引用
收藏
页码:1474 / 1483
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The fall of research and rise of innovation: Changes in New Zealand science policy discourse
    Leitch, Shirley
    Motion, Judy
    Merlot, Elizabeth
    Davenport, Sally
    SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2014, 41 (01) : 119 - 130
  • [42] Fit for social innovation? Policy reflections for EU energy and climate policy making
    Rogge, Karoline S.
    Stadler, Maria
    de Geus, Tessa
    Hielscher, Sabine
    Wittmayer, Julia
    Broich, Annalena
    Kotler, Adrienne
    Mischkowski, Niklas
    Stasik, Agata
    Ranville, Adelie
    Vernay, Anne-Lorene
    OXFORD OPEN ENERGY, 2023, 2
  • [43] US and EU Privacy Policy: Comparison of Regulatory Approaches
    Movius, Lauren B.
    Krup, Nathalie
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION, 2009, 3 : 169 - U1119
  • [44] Climate Change Law and Policy: EU and US Approaches
    Mehling, Michael
    REVIEW OF EUROPEAN COMPARATIVE & INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW, 2013, 22 (01)
  • [45] Alternative approaches to governance in the EU: EU social policy and the European employment strategy
    Mosher, JS
    Trubek, DM
    JOURNAL OF COMMON MARKET STUDIES, 2003, 41 (01): : 63 - 88
  • [46] NEW POLICY ENCOURAGES INNOVATION
    NOAKES, HL
    AGRICULTURAL EDUCATION, 1970, 42 (07): : 172 - &
  • [47] Distributors campaign for changes to EU chemical policy
    Young, I
    CHEMICAL WEEK, 2003, 165 (42) : 36 - 36
  • [48] Regional Innovation Patterns and the EU Regional Policy Reform: Toward Smart Innovation Policies
    Camagni, Roberto
    Capello, Roberta
    GROWTH AND CHANGE, 2013, 44 (02) : 355 - 389
  • [49] From NGEU to REPowerEU: policy steering and budgetary innovation in the EU
    Schramm, Lucas
    Terranova, Chiara
    JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN INTEGRATION, 2024, 46 (06) : 943 - 961
  • [50] The emergence of EU defence research policy: from innovation to militarization
    Dokos, Thanos
    SOUTHEAST EUROPEAN AND BLACK SEA STUDIES, 2018, 18 (04) : 602 - 603