Comparison of the outcome and morbidity for localized or locally advanced prostate cancer treated by high-dose-rate brachytherapy plus external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) versus EBRT alone

被引:27
|
作者
Fang, Fu-Min [2 ]
Wang, Yu-Ming [2 ]
Wang, Chong-Jong [2 ]
Huang, Hsuan-Ying [3 ]
Chiang, Po-Hui [1 ]
机构
[1] Chang Gung Univ, Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Urol, Kaohsiung Med Ctr,Coll Med, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[2] Chang Gung Univ, Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Kaohsiung Med Ctr,Coll Med, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[3] Chang Gung Univ, Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Pathol, Kaohsiung Med Ctr,Coll Med, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
关键词
high-dose-rate brachytherapy; external beam radiotherapy; prostate cancer;
D O I
10.1093/jjco/hyn056
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare the survival, gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity for localized or locally advanced prostate cancer treated by high-dose-rate-brachytherapy (HDR-BT) plus external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) versus EBRT alone at a single institute in Taiwan. Methods: Eighty-eight patients with T1c-T3b prostate cancer consecutively treated by EBRT alone (33 patients) or HDR-BT+EBRT (55 patients) were studied. The median dose of EBRT was 70.2 Gy in the EBRT group and 50.4 Gy in the HDR-BT group. HDR-BT was performed 2-3 weeks before EBRT, with 12.6 Gy in three fractions over 24 h. Results: Five patients (15.2%) in the EBRT group and seven (12.7%) in the HDR-BT group developed a biochemical relapse. The 5-year actuarial biochemical relapse-free survival rates were 65.0% in the EBRT group and 66.7% in the HDR-BT group (P = 0.76). The 5-year actuarial likelihood of late >= Grade 2 and >= Grade 3 GI toxicity in the EBRT versus HDR-BT group was 62.8 versus 7.7% (P < 0.001) and 19.6 versus 0% (P = 0.001), respectively. In a multivariate analysis, the only predictor for late GI toxicity was the mode of RT. The 5-year actuarial likelihood of late >= Grade 2 and >= Grade 3 GU toxicity in the EBRT versus HDR-BT group was 14.8 versus 15.9% (P = 0.86) and 3.6 versus 8.5% (P = 0.40), respectively. Conclusions: The addition of HDR-BT before EBRT with a reduced dose from the EBRT produces a comparable survival outcome and GU toxicity but a significantly less GI toxicity for prostate cancer patients.
引用
收藏
页码:474 / 479
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] External Beam Radiation Therapy Plus High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy in the Treatment of Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer.
    Ferrer, F.
    Boladeras, A.
    Santorsa, L.
    Martinez, E.
    Gutierrez, C.
    Pino, F.
    Castells, M.
    Gracia, R.
    Pineiro, R.
    Suarez, J.
    Pera, J.
    Guedea, F.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2014, 90 : S434 - S434
  • [22] High-dose-rate brachytherapy monotherapy versus low-dose-rate brachytherapy with or without external beam radiotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer
    Yamazaki, Hideya
    Masui, Koji
    Suzuki, Gen
    Nakamura, Satoaki
    Yamada, Kei
    Okihara, Koji
    Shiraishi, Takumi
    Yoshida, Ken
    Kotsuma, Tadayuki
    Tanaka, Eiichi
    Otani, Keisuke
    Yoshioka, Yasuo
    Ogawa, Kazuhiko
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2019, 132 : 162 - 170
  • [23] HIGH DOSE RATE (HDR) BRACHYTHERAPY plus EXTERNAL BEAM RADIOTHERAPY (EBRT) FOR HORMONE-NAIVE EARLY AND INTERMEDIATE STAGE PROSTATE CANCER.
    Aluwini, S.
    van Rooij, P.
    Janson, P.
    Kirkels, W.
    Praag, J.
    Bangma, C.
    Kolkman-Deurloo, I. K.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2010, 96 : S214 - S214
  • [24] External beam radiotherapy plus high-dose-rate brachytherapy for treatment of locally advanced prostate cancer: The initial experience of the Catalan Institute of Oncology
    Pistis, Francesca
    Guedea, Ferran
    Pera, Joan
    Gutierrez, Cristina
    Ventura, Montse
    Polo, Alfredo
    Martinez, Evelyn
    Boladeras, Ana
    Ferrer, Ferran
    Gabriele, Pietro
    Linares, Luis
    BRACHYTHERAPY, 2010, 9 (01) : 15 - 22
  • [25] Primary Radiotherapy in non-metastatic Prostate Cancer - Retrospective Data Analysis EBRT plus HDR Brachytherapy versus EBRT alone
    Fischer, L. A.
    Hille, A.
    Knaus, O.
    Droege, L. H.
    Ziegler, D. A.
    Guhlich, M.
    Bendrich, S.
    Trojan, L.
    Strauss, A.
    Reichert, M.
    Puetsch, F.
    Braulke, F.
    Rieken, S.
    El Shafie, R.
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2022, 198 (SUPPL 1) : S126 - S126
  • [26] COMPARISON OF HIGH-DOSE EBRT AND EBRT WITH BRACHYTHERAPY BOOST IN TREATMENT OF PROSTATE CANCER PATIENTS
    Smolska-Ciszewska, B.
    Miszczyk, L.
    Bialas, B.
    Gawkowska-Suwinska, M.
    Plewicki, G.
    Fijalkowski, M.
    Giglok, M.
    Behrendt, K.
    Nowicka, E.
    Zajusz, A.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2010, 96 : S398 - S398
  • [27] Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Localized and Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer Undergoing High-dose-rate Brachytherapy with External-beam Radiotherapy at our Institute
    Makino, Tomoyuki
    Mizokami, Atsushi
    Namiki, Mikio
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2015, 35 (03) : 1723 - 1728
  • [28] Comparison of outcomes in high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with low-/high-dose-rate brachytherapy plus external beam radiotherapy
    Yu Imai
    Fumihiko Urabe
    Kosuke Iwatani
    Minoru Nakazono
    Kojiro Tashiro
    Mariko Honda
    Manabu Aoki
    Shun Sato
    Hiroyuki Takahashi
    Kenta Miki
    Takahiro Kimura
    International Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2023, 28 : 698 - 706
  • [29] RANDOMISED TRIAL OF EXTERNAL BEAM RADIOTHERAPY ALONE OR WITH HIGH-DOSE-RATE BRACHYTHERAPY BOOST IN LOCALISED PROSTATE CANCER
    Hoskin, P.
    Rojas, A. M.
    Ostler, P. J.
    Hughes, R.
    Bryant, L.
    Lowe, G.
    Woodruff, M.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2010, 96 : S112 - S113
  • [30] Comparison of outcomes in high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with low-/high-dose-rate brachytherapy plus external beam radiotherapy
    Imai, Yu
    Urabe, Fumihiko
    Iwatani, Kosuke
    Nakazono, Minoru
    Tashiro, Kojiro
    Honda, Mariko
    Aoki, Manabu
    Sato, Shun
    Takahashi, Hiroyuki
    Miki, Kenta
    Kimura, Takahiro
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 28 (05) : 698 - 706