Local Versus General Anesthesia in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

被引:30
|
作者
Jabbar, Avais [1 ]
Khurana, Ayush [1 ]
Mohammed, Ashfaq [1 ]
Das, Rajiv [1 ]
Zaman, Azfar [1 ]
Edwards, Richard [1 ]
机构
[1] Freeman Rd Hosp, Ctr Cardiothorac, Cardiothorac Serv, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY | 2016年 / 118卷 / 11期
关键词
EDWARDS SAPIEN-XT; COREVALVE PROSTHESIS; IMPLANTATION; STENOSIS; FEASIBILITY; OUTCOMES; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.08.051
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is conventionally performed under general anesthesia (GA) allowing intraoperative transoesophageal echocardiogram imaging. We present our experience in patients having the procedure under local anesthesia (LA), who were subsequently transferred to a low dependency unit postprocedure, to assess safety and length of hospital stay. We retrospectively assessed all the transfemoral TAVR procedures conducted at our center from January 03, 2011. Of 216 patients, 145 had the procedure under GA and 71 under LA. Both groups were similar with respect to age, co-morbidities, Euro Score, and the severity of the aortic stenosis. The procedure time was. significantly shorter in the LA group measured from time in room to skin closure (108 vs 143 minutes, p <0.001). Skin open to skin closure time were the same in both groups (78 vs 79.4 minutes, p = 0.57). There was no difference in 30 days: aortic regurgitation > mild (2.1% in GA and 2.8% in LA, p = 0.67), need for permanent pacing (3.4% in GA and 1.4% in LA, p = 0.32), and disabling cerebrovascular accidents (1.4% and 1.4%, p = 1.0). The 30-day survival was not significantly different (95.9% in GA and 100% in LA, p = 0.17), whereas the median number of days in hospital was shorter in the LA group (4 in GA and 2 in LA, p <0.001). No emergency conversions to GA were performed in the LA group and only 1 patient needed admission to a high dependency (HD) unit. In conclusion, performing a TAVR under LA is at least as safe as GA. In addition, there is a reduced procedural time and length of hospital stay. LA is a safe and cost-effective alternative to GA and patients can be safely transferred to a low dependency unit. Crown Copyright (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1712 / 1716
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] OUTCOMES WITH CONSCIOUS SEDATION VERSUS GENERAL ANESTHESIA IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT
    Lew, Michelle
    Kuo, Ruth
    Ortwine, Kristine
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 67 (13) : 402 - 402
  • [22] Pro: General Anesthesia Should Be Used for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
    Rosenkrans, Daniel
    Kumar, Priya A.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2023, 37 (05) : 827 - 828
  • [23] Conversion from Monitored Anesthesia Care to General Anesthesia for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
    Kimmel, Joseph
    Potosky, Ryan
    Williams, Mathew R.
    Glading, Matthew
    Neuburger, Peter J.
    Roberts, J. Devin
    Feider, Andrew
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2018, 32 (02) : 1032 - 1040
  • [24] COMPARISON OF MONITORED ANESTHESIA CARE AND GENERAL ANESTHESIA FOR TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT (TAVR)
    Kislitsina, Olga
    Smith, Danielle
    Duc Pham
    Churyla, Andrei
    Ricciardi, Mark
    Sweis, Ranya
    Davidson, Charles
    Flaherty, James
    Kruse, Jane
    McCarthy, Patrick
    Malaisrie, S. Chris
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 71 (11) : 1223 - 1223
  • [25] CONSCIOUS SEDATION VERSUS GENERAL ANESTHESIA FOR TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT: RESULTS OF AN INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLE ANALYSIS
    Butala, Neel
    Chung, Mabel
    Secemsky, Eric
    Manandhar, Pratik
    Marquis-Gravel, Guillaume
    Kosinski, Andrzej
    Vemulapalli, Sreekanth
    Yeh, Robert W.
    Cohen, David J.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 75 (11) : 1428 - 1428
  • [26] Patient Selection and Outcomes of Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Performed with Monitored Anesthesia Care Versus General Anesthesia
    Pani, Saroj
    Cagino, John
    Feustel, Paul
    Musuku, Sridhar Reddy
    Raja, Asim
    Bruno, Natalie
    Ursillo, Christopher
    Arunakul, Nathapong
    Poulos, Constantine M.
    Welljams-Dorof, Michael
    Roberts, Kevin
    Torosoff, Mikhail
    Delago, Augustine
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2017, 31 (06) : 2049 - 2054
  • [27] Local versus general anesthesia for transfemoral aortic valve implantation
    Lukas J. Motloch
    Dennis Rottlaender
    Sara Reda
    Robert Larbig
    Marie Bruns
    Jochen Müller-Ehmsen
    Justus Strauch
    Navid Madershahian
    Erland Erdmann
    Thorsten Wahlers
    Uta C. Hoppe
    Clinical Research in Cardiology, 2012, 101 : 45 - 53
  • [28] Local versus general anesthesia for transfemoral aortic valve implantation
    Motloch, Lukas J.
    Rottlaender, Dennis
    Reda, Sara
    Larbig, Robert
    Bruns, Marie
    Mueller-Ehmsen, Jochen
    Strauch, Justus
    Madershahian, Navid
    Erdmann, Erland
    Wahlers, Thorsten
    Hoppe, Uta C.
    CLINICAL RESEARCH IN CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 101 (01) : 45 - 53
  • [29] Redo Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement versus Valve in Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
    Patel, Parth M.
    Chiou, Edward
    Wei, Jane W.
    Binongo, Jose N.
    Guyton, Robert A.
    Leshnower, Bradley G.
    Grubb, Kendra J.
    Chen, Edward P.
    CIRCULATION, 2020, 142
  • [30] Outcomes of Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Performed With General Anesthesia Using a Supraglottic Airway Versus Monitored Anesthesia Care
    Musuku, Sridhar R.
    Di Capua, Christopher A.
    Doshi, Isha
    Cherukupalli, Divya
    Byun, Youjung
    Shapeton, Alexander D.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2021, 35 (06) : 1760 - 1768