Importance of risk acceptance criteria in the decision making process - a review

被引:0
|
作者
Rodrigues, M. A. [1 ,2 ]
Arezes, P. [2 ]
Leao, C. P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Porto Polytech Inst, Sch Allied Hlth Technol, Res Ctr Hlth & Environm, Vila Nova De Gaia, Portugal
[2] Univ Minho, Sch Engn, Dept Product & Syst, P-4719 Braga, Portugal
关键词
Risk; Acceptability; Criteria; Assessment; Occupational; ACCEPTABILITY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TB18 [人体工程学];
学科分类号
1201 ;
摘要
The risk acceptance is a problematic issue associated with risk assessment in occupational environments. It is essential that the organizations define how the occupational risk can be minimized in order to obtain an acceptable level, being the definition of the acceptance criteria fundamental. Considering the scarcity of previous work concerning the current criteria used by the organizations, this paper aims to discuss the occupational risk acceptability problematic through a literature review. This work shows that the risk acceptability can be defined as the accepted risk level for a specific dangerous situation. Considering that the risk decision is influenced by several variables and that companies define their own acceptance criteria, these can vary considerably between companies. Previous studies shown that, the application of different criteria to the same risk situation can lead to different decisions about risk. Therefore, some authors have advocated for the government intervention in the criteria formulation, through the publication of specific legislation. Currently, different sciences have defined distinct criteria. According to Health and Safety Executive, the criteria used by the regulators in the health, safety and environment areas can be classified in three "pure" criteria: equity-based, utility-based and technology-based. Among the presented criteria, the first two have been often considered. These criteria are frequently presented in terms of limits and, typically, they express the probability and the consequences of a dangerous event. The acceptance criteria shall be based on a measure of the risk of occupational accidents. Currently, there are several risk measures available, so, it is important to choose the most appropriate. This paper tries to address the importance of the definition of acceptance criteria, considering that, its inadequate definition and use, may promote an incorrect decision about occupational risk. Therefore, it seems to be important to study which criteria the organizations consider the most appropriate according to their specific needs.
引用
收藏
页码:562 / 566
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Decision Making for the Software Architecture Structure Based on the Criteria Importance Theory
    Orlov, Sergey
    Vishnyakov, Andrei
    ICTE 2016, 2017, 104 : 27 - 34
  • [22] Multi-criteria decision-making process for buildings
    Barcomb, JD
    Curtner, A
    35TH INTERSOCIETY ENERGY CONVERSION ENGINEERING CONFERENCE & EXHIBIT (IECEC), VOLS 1 AND 2, TECHNICAL PAPERS, 2000, : 528 - 535
  • [23] Optimizing the decision making process based on the interrelationships among criteria
    Yoshimura, Masataka
    Fujimi, Yoshihisa
    Izui, Kazuhiro
    Nippon Kikai Gakkai Ronbunshu, C Hen/Transactions of the Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers, Part C, 2002, 68 (04): : 1310 - 1318
  • [24] Multi-criteria decision making with a special type of information about importance of groups of criteria
    Utkin, Lev V.
    ISIPTA '09: PROCEEDINGS OF THE SIXTH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON IMPRECISE PROBABILITY: THEORIES AND APPLICATIONS, 2009, : 411 - 420
  • [25] Error risk in the decision-making process
    Baldi, Pier Luigi
    EMERGENCY CARE JOURNAL, 2014, 10 (01) : 37 - 40
  • [26] Impact of a risk based breast screening decision aid on understanding, acceptance and decision making
    Lippey, Jocelyn
    Keogh, Louise
    Campbell, Ian
    Mann, Gregory Bruce
    Forrest, Laura Elenor
    NPJ BREAST CANCER, 2023, 9 (01)
  • [27] Impact of a risk based breast screening decision aid on understanding, acceptance and decision making
    Jocelyn Lippey
    Louise Keogh
    Ian Campbell
    Gregory Bruce Mann
    Laura Elenor Forrest
    npj Breast Cancer, 9
  • [28] THE MANUSCRIPT REVIEW AND DECISION-MAKING PROCESS
    BAKANIC, V
    MCPHAIL, C
    SIMON, RJ
    AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1987, 52 (05) : 631 - 642
  • [29] Multiple criteria decision making and decision support systems for flood risk management
    Jason K. Levy
    Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2005, 19 : 438 - 447
  • [30] Multiple criteria decision making and decision support systems for flood risk management
    Levy, JK
    STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2005, 19 (06) : 438 - 447