GEOGRAPHIC DIFFERENCES OF GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSION REDUCTION FROM ELECTRIC VEHICLE DEPLOYMENT IN THE UNITED STATES

被引:0
|
作者
Yang, Fan [1 ]
Yuan, Chris [1 ]
Zhao, Xiang [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53201 USA
[2] Gen Motors Corp, Warren, MI USA
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME 9TH INTERNATIONAL MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, 2014, VOL 1 | 2014年
关键词
LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The use of electric vehicle (EV) has been widely recognized as an effective way to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from transportation sector. However, the geographic difference of GHG emission reduction from EV deployment is seldom explored. This paper presents a study on the total GHG emissions generated from the life cycle of an EV (represented by Nissan Leaf) and an internal combustion vehicle (ICV) (represented by Toyota Corolla) for benchmarking on the potential emission reductions in the United States. The differences of electricity mix and driving style in each state are considered in the analysis. The results indicate a 43% GHG emissions reduction from ICV with the deployment of EV under the current average United States' electricity generation scheme and transportation style. But the life cycle GHG emission reductions vary significantly from state to state in the U.S. Some states such as Indiana, Wyoming and West Virginia can only get 7237, 9501 and 9860 kg CO2 equivalent reduced, while some states such as Vermont, New Jersey and Idaho can get 57915, 57206 and 49039 kg CO2 equivalent GHG emissions reduced. This study can be useful in supporting future decision-making and strategy development for EV deployment in the U.S.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Greenhouse gas emission accounting for EU member states from 1991 to 2012
    Su, Meirong
    Pauleit, Stephan
    Yin, Xuemei
    Zheng, Ying
    Chen, Shaoqing
    Xu, Chao
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2016, 184 : 759 - 768
  • [32] Uncertainty in Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions from United States Coal
    Venkatesh, Aranya
    Jaramillo, Paulina
    Griffin, W. Michael
    Matthews, H. Scott
    ENERGY & FUELS, 2012, 26 (08) : 4917 - 4923
  • [33] Socioeconomic Drivers of Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the United States
    Liang, Sai
    Wang, Hongxia
    Qu, Shen
    Feng, Tiantian
    Guan, Dabo
    Fang, Hong
    Xu, Ming
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 50 (14) : 7535 - 7545
  • [34] Greenhouse gas emissions from a diversity of sheep production systems in the United States
    Recktenwald, Erin B.
    Ehrhardt, Richard A.
    AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2024, 217
  • [35] Optimal design of electric vehicle public charging system in an urban network for Greenhouse Gas Emission and cost minimization
    Lee, Jinwoo
    Madanat, Samer
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART C-EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2017, 85 : 494 - 508
  • [36] Electric vehicle lifecycle carbon emission reduction: A review
    Gao, Zhenhai
    Xie, Haicheng
    Yang, Xianbin
    Zhang, Lisheng
    Yu, Hanqing
    Wang, Wentao
    Liu, Yongfeng
    Xu, Youqing
    Ma, Bin
    Liu, Xinhua
    Chen, Siyan
    CARBON NEUTRALIZATION, 2023, 2 (05): : 528 - 550
  • [37] Life-Cycle Greenhouse Gas and Criteria Air Pollutant Emissions of Electric Vehicles in the United States
    Cai, Hao
    Wang, Michael
    Elgowainy, Amgad
    Han, Jeongwoo
    SAE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ALTERNATIVE POWERTRAINS, 2013, 2 (02) : 325 - 336
  • [38] Costs and benefits of differences in the timing of greenhouse gas emission reductions
    Admiraal, Annemiek K.
    Hof, Andries F.
    den Elzen, Michel G. J.
    van Vuuren, Detlef P.
    MITIGATION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGIES FOR GLOBAL CHANGE, 2016, 21 (08) : 1165 - 1179
  • [39] Study on the Mechanism of Agricultural Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Under Macro Emission Reduction Measures
    Gong, Zeyu
    Huo, Xuexi
    AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2024, 14 (11):
  • [40] Costs and benefits of differences in the timing of greenhouse gas emission reductions
    Annemiek K. Admiraal
    Andries F. Hof
    Michel G. J. den Elzen
    Detlef P. van Vuuren
    Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2016, 21 : 1165 - 1179