Psychometric evaluation of the Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire (INQ) using item analysis according to the Rasch model

被引:5
|
作者
Upegui-Arango, Luz Dary [1 ]
Forkmann, Thomas [2 ]
Nielsen, Tine [3 ]
Hallensleben, Nina [4 ]
Glaesmer, Heide [4 ]
Spangenberg, Lena [4 ]
Teismann, Tobias [5 ]
Juckel, Georg [6 ]
Boecker, Maren [1 ]
机构
[1] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Univ Hosp, Inst Med Psychol & Med Sociol, Aachen, Germany
[2] Univ Duisburg Essen, Dept Clin Psychol, Essen, Germany
[3] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Psychol, Copenhagen, Denmark
[4] Univ Leipzig, Dept Med Psychol & Med Sociol, Leipzig, Germany
[5] Ruhr Univ Bochum, Dept Psychol, Mental Hlth Res & Treatment Ctr, Bochum, Germany
[6] Ruhr Univ Bochum, LWL Univ Hosp, Dept Psychiat, Bochum, Germany
来源
PLOS ONE | 2020年 / 15卷 / 08期
关键词
SUICIDAL IDEATION; LOCAL DEPENDENCE; GERMAN VERSION; VALIDITY; BURDENSOMENESS; BELONGINGNESS; ASSOCIATION; OBJECTIVITY; SCALES; DESIRE;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0232030
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire (INQ) assesses Thwarted Belongingness (TB) and Perceived Burdensomeness (PB), two predictors of suicidal thoughts. Up to now, the use of item response theory (IRT) for the evaluation of the INQ has been restricted to a single study with clinically depressed and suicidal youth. Therefore, the psychometric properties of the two INQ-15-subscales TB and PB were now evaluated in a general population sample (N = 2508) and a clinical adult population sample (N = 185) using IRT, specifically the Rasch model (RM) and the graphical log-linear Rasch model (GLLRM). Of special interest was whether the INQ-subscales displayed differential item functioning (DIF) across the two different samples and how well the subscales were targeted to the two sample populations. For the clinical sample, fit to a GLLRM could be established for the PB-subscale and fit to a RM was established for a five-item version of the TB-subscale. In contrast, for the general population sample fit to a GLLRM could only be achieved for the PB-subscale. Overall, there was strong evidence of local dependence (LD) across items and of some age- and gender-related DIF. Both subscales exhibited massive DIF related to the sample, indicating that they don't work the same across the general population and clinical sample. As expected, targeting of both INQ-subscales was much better for the clinical population. Further investigations of the INQ-15 under the Rasch approach in a large clinical population are recommended to determine and optimize the scale performance.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Psychometric Evaluation of the Big Five Questionnaire for Children (BFQ-C): A Rasch Model Approach
    Marcos Cupani
    Valeria E. Morán
    Fernanda B. Ghío
    Ana E. Azpilicueta
    Sebastián J. Garrido
    Journal of Child and Family Studies, 2020, 29 : 2472 - 2486
  • [42] Psychometric evaluation of the situational confidence questionnaire in adolescents: Fitting a graded item response model
    Kirisci, L
    Moss, HB
    Tarter, RE
    ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS, 1996, 21 (03) : 303 - 317
  • [43] Psychometric Evaluation of Perceived Internship PUA Scale: Using Rasch Analysis
    Yang, Yanchao
    Li, Wangze
    Xue, Sijia
    Huang, Wenxue
    Guo, Shijie
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EDUCATION, 2025, 60 (01)
  • [44] An Evaluation of the Structural Validity of the Work Limitation Questionnaire Using the Rasch Model
    Lu, Ze
    MacDermid, Joy C.
    Packham, Tara
    Bryant, Dianne
    Faber, Kenneth
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2021, 102 (04): : 633 - 644
  • [45] An item analysis according to the Rasch model of the German 12-item WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0)
    Lusine Vaganian
    Sonja Bussmann
    Maren Boecker
    Michael Kusch
    Hildegard Labouvie
    Alexander L. Gerlach
    Jan C. Cwik
    Quality of Life Research, 2021, 30 : 2929 - 2938
  • [46] An item analysis according to the Rasch model of the German 12-item WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0)
    Vaganian, Lusine
    Bussmann, Sonja
    Boecker, Maren
    Kusch, Michael
    Labouvie, Hildegard
    Gerlach, Alexander L.
    Cwik, Jan C.
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2021, 30 (10) : 2929 - 2938
  • [47] Assessing the psychometric properties of the Chinese return-to-work self-efficacy questionnaire using Rasch model analysis
    Feng Liu
    Zhenxiang Zhang
    Beilei Lin
    Zhiguang Ping
    Yongxia Mei
    Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 20
  • [48] The emotion regulation questionnaire in women with cancer: A psychometric evaluation and an item response theory analysis
    Brandao, Tania
    Schulz, Marc S.
    Gross, James J.
    Matos, Paula Mena
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2017, 26 (10) : 1647 - 1653
  • [49] Assessing the psychometric properties of the Chinese return-to-work self-efficacy questionnaire using Rasch model analysis
    Liu, Feng
    Zhang, Zhenxiang
    Lin, Beilei
    Ping, Zhiguang
    Mei, Yongxia
    HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2022, 20 (01)
  • [50] Development and psychometric evaluation of the Hospital Nurse Interpersonal Empathy Questionnaire
    Montazeri, Mina
    Tagharrobi, Zahra
    Sooki, Zahra
    Sharifi, Khadijeh
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING SCIENCES, 2020, 7 (03) : 337 - 343