Novel methodologies for analysing critical infrastructure resilience

被引:0
|
作者
Storesund, K. [1 ]
Reitan, N. K. [1 ]
Sjostrom, J. [2 ]
Rod, B. [3 ]
Guay, F. [4 ]
Almcida, R. [5 ]
Theocharidou, M. [6 ]
机构
[1] RISE Fire Res, Trondheim, Norway
[2] RISE Res Inst Sweden, Boras, Sweden
[3] UiT Arctic Univ Norway, Tromso, Norway
[4] INOV INESC Inovacao, Lisbon, Portugal
[5] Danish Inst Fire & Secur Technol, Hvidovre, Denmark
[6] European Commiss, Joint Res Ctr, Ispra, Italy
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
TRIANGULATION;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In the field of Critical Infrastructures (CI), both policy and research focus has shifted from protection to resilience. The IMPROVER project has developed a CI resilience management framework (ICI-REF), applicable to all types of CI and resilience domains (technological, organisational and societal) allowing operators to understand and improve their resilience. IMPROVER has also developed methodologies to be used within the framework, accompanied with resilience indicators for operators to assess their technological and organisational resilience. The framework allows CI operators to incorporate resilience management as part of their risk management processes. The ICI-REF, the resilience analysis methodologies and indicators have been optimised, applied and demonstrated in a pilot implementation, focusing on the potable water supply in Barreiro, Portugal. Conclusions from the operators so far are that the indicators, well-defined and unambiguously described, are crucial for monitoring resilience activities, to ensure objective, consistent, repeatable and representative results from the assessed processes.
引用
收藏
页码:1221 / 1229
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Contribution to Enhancement of Critical Infrastructure Resilience in Serbia
    Todorovic, Branislav
    Trifunovic, Darko
    Jonev, Katarina
    Filipovic, Marina
    RESILIENCE AND RISK: METHODS AND APPLICATION IN ENVIRONMENT, CYBER AND SOCIAL DOMAINS, 2017, : 531 - 551
  • [32] Resistance and resilience - paradigms for critical local infrastructure
    Rogers, Christopher D. F.
    Bouch, Christopher J.
    Williams, Stephen
    Barber, Austin R. G.
    Baker, Christopher J.
    Bryson, John R.
    Chapman, David N.
    Chapman, Lee
    Coaffee, Jon
    Jefferson, Ian
    Quinn, Andrew D.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-MUNICIPAL ENGINEER, 2012, 165 (02) : 73 - 84
  • [33] Toward resilience management in critical information infrastructure
    Hamida, Yaou
    Amine, Baina
    Mostafa, Bellafkih
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2015 5TH WORLD CONGRESS ON INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES (WICT), 2015, : 101 - 106
  • [34] A Resilience Assessment Framework for Critical Infrastructure Systems
    Shen, Lijuan
    Tang, Loonching
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2015 FIRST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RELIABILITY SYSTEMS ENGINEERING 2015 ICRSE, 2015,
  • [35] Fuzzy architecture assessment for critical infrastructure resilience
    Muller, George
    COMPLEX ADAPTIVE SYSTEMS 2012, 2012, 12 : 367 - 372
  • [36] Critical review of the threats affecting the building of critical infrastructure resilience
    Osei-Kyei, Robert
    Tam, Vivian
    Ma, Mingxue
    Mashiri, Fidelis
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2021, 60
  • [37] SAFETY CRITICAL MARITIME INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS RESILIENCE: A CRITICAL REVIEW
    John, A.
    Nwaoha, T. C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MARITIME ENGINEERING, 2016, 158 : A209 - A217
  • [38] Contrasting critical infrastructure resilience from Swedish infrastructure failure data
    Johansson, J.
    Bjarenstam, R. Jonason
    Axelsdottir, E.
    SAFETY AND RELIABILITY - SAFE SOCIETIES IN A CHANGING WORLD, 2018, : 1287 - 1295
  • [39] TERRORISM "ASSESSING THE THREAT FOR CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE" METHODOLOGIES FOR WATER SUPPLIER
    Czerni, Di Wolfgang
    THREATS TO FOOD AND WATER CHAIN INFRASTRUCTURE, 2010, : 99 - 108
  • [40] Methodologies and applications for critical infrastructure protection: State-of-the-art
    Yusta, Jose M.
    Correa, Gabriel J.
    Lacal-Arantegui, Roberto
    ENERGY POLICY, 2011, 39 (10) : 6100 - 6119