The impact of individual differences on influence strategies

被引:50
|
作者
Alkis, Nurcan [1 ]
Temizel, Tugba Taskaya [1 ]
机构
[1] Middle E Tech Univ, Inst Informat, Dept Informat Syst, TR-06531 Ankara, Turkey
关键词
Big Five; Personality traits; Bayesian SEM; Influence principles; Persuasion; 5 PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS; PERFORMANCE; CONSCIENTIOUSNESS; RECIPROCITY; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.paid.2015.07.037
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Persuasion and its applications aim at positively changing human behavior and they work the best when they are tailored to individuals. Recent studies show that individuals could give different responses to the same persuasion strategies which lead to personalization of persuasion strategies for better effectiveness. This study investigates what persuasion strategies are more effective for whom. More specifically, the relationship between the Big Five Personality traits (extraversion, neuroticism, agreeableness, conscientiousness and openness) and six persuasion strategies (authority, reciprocation, scarcity, liking, commitment and consensus) is explored. This study was conducted with 381 university students. A structured questionnaire comprising the Big Five Inventory Personality Trait scale and the Susceptibility to Persuasion Strategies scale was used to collect data. The Bayesian estimation was employed to reveal causal relationships. The results show that there are significant relations between personality traits and influence strategies. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:147 / 152
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Interacting with an Algorithm: The Influence of Experience and Individual Differences
    Harris, Krista
    Alarcon, Gene
    Jessup, Sarah
    Noblick, Jacob
    Meyers, Scott
    DESIGN, USER EXPERIENCE, AND USABILITY, DUXU 2023, PT III, 2023, 14032 : 194 - 207
  • [42] Regulatory focus strategies scale: A measure of individual differences in the endorsement of regulatory strategies
    Ouschan, Lucette
    Boldero, Jennifer M.
    Kashima, Yoshihisa
    Wakimoto, Ryuutaro
    Kashima, Emiko S.
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 10 (04) : 243 - 257
  • [43] UGH! DISGUST CONDITIONING AND THE INFLUENCE OF INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES
    Klucken, Tim
    Schweckendiek, Jan
    Vaitl, Dieter
    Stark, Rudolf
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2009, 46 : S102 - S102
  • [44] Individual Differences and the Susceptibility to the Influence of Anchoring Cues
    Furnham, Adrian
    Boo, Hua Chu
    McClelland, Alastair
    JOURNAL OF INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2012, 33 (02) : 89 - 93
  • [45] The influence of individual differences on organizational safety attitudes
    Henning, Jaime B.
    Stufft, Carolyn J.
    Payne, Stephanie C.
    Bergman, Mindy E.
    Mannan, M. Sam
    Keren, Nir
    SAFETY SCIENCE, 2009, 47 (03) : 337 - 345
  • [46] Individual differences in the phenomenological impact of social stigma
    Harvey, RD
    JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 141 (02): : 174 - 189
  • [47] A Study of the Impact of Individual Differences on Online Shopping
    Wang, Jianfeng
    Gu, Linwu
    Aiken, Milam
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF E-BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2010, 6 (01) : 52 - 67
  • [48] Individual differences impact support for vigilante justice
    McDermott, Christine M.
    Miller, Monica K.
    JOURNAL OF AGGRESSION CONFLICT AND PEACE RESEARCH, 2016, 8 (03) : 186 - 196
  • [49] The Impact of Adapting Content for Students with Individual Differences
    Flores, Raymond
    Ari, Fatih
    Inan, Fethi A.
    Arslan-Ari, Ismahan
    EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY & SOCIETY, 2012, 15 (03): : 251 - 261
  • [50] Individual differences in lying and the impact of being deceived
    Lawrence, C.
    Ferguson, E.
    PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2020, 157