Individual differences in approach and avoidance movements: How the avoidance motive influences response force

被引:37
|
作者
Puca, Rosa Maria
Rinkenauer, Gerhard
Breidenstein, Christian
机构
[1] Univ Dortmund, Inst Occupat Physiol, D-44139 Dortmund, Germany
[2] Univ Tubingen, D-72074 Tubingen, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00400.x
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The present research is based on the assumption that people differ in their responsiveness to incentives and threats. In two experiments we examined whether the trait corresponding to the responsiveness to threats (avoidance motive) and the trait corresponding to the responsiveness to incentives (approach motive) influence voluntary motor behavior toward or away from stimuli. In Experiment 1, stimuli consisted of positive and negative words within a lexical decision task. Participants moved their arms backward in order to withdraw from the stimuli or forward in order to approach them. In Experiment 2, participants responded with forward or backward arm movements to neutral sounds coming from behind or in front of them. The main dependent variable was the strength of the approach and avoidance movements. In both experiments this variable was related to participants' avoidance-motive disposition but not to their approach-motive disposition. Avoidance-motivated individuals generally showed more forceful avoidance movements than approach movements. There was no effect of stimulus valence on the strength of the movements in Experiment 1. Furthermore, the results of Experiment 2 suggest that it is not the physical direction (forward or backward) but rather the movement's effect of distance reduction (approach) or distance increase (avoidance) in regard to the stimulus that defines a movement as an approach or an avoidance movement.
引用
收藏
页码:979 / 1014
页数:36
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Approach and avoidance movements are unaffected by cognitive conflict: A comparison of the Simon effect and stimulus–response compatibility
    D. Kerzel
    S. Buetti
    Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2012, 19 : 456 - 461
  • [32] EYE-MOVEMENTS AS A PARADIGM OF APPROACH AND AVOIDANCE-BEHAVIOR
    WEBB, WW
    MATHENY, A
    LARSON, G
    PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS, 1963, 16 (02) : 341 - 347
  • [33] FURTHER COMMENT ON APPROACH AVOIDANCE AS CATEGORIES OF RESPONSE
    NISSEN, HW
    PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1952, 59 (02) : 161 - 167
  • [34] Individual differences in approach-avoidance aptitude: some clues from research on Parkinson's disease
    Costa, Alberto
    Caltagirone, Carlo
    FRONTIERS IN SYSTEMS NEUROSCIENCE, 2015, 9
  • [35] NAVIGATING THE APPROACH-AVOIDANCE MATRIX: EXPLORING INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN A NOVEL VIRTUAL REALITY FORAGING TASK
    Kastrinoglannis, Alexandros
    Lonsdorf, Tina
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2023, 60 : S183 - S184
  • [36] Amygdala responses to positively and negatively valenced baby faces in healthy female volunteers: Influences of individual differences in harm avoidance
    Baeken, Chris
    De Raedt, Rudi
    Ramsey, Nick
    Van Schuerbeek, Peter
    Hermes, Dora
    Bossuyt, Axel
    Leyman, Lemke
    Vanderhasselt, Marie-Anne
    De Mey, Johan
    Luypaert, Robert
    BRAIN RESEARCH, 2009, 1296 : 94 - 103
  • [37] EFFECTS OF DRUGS ON AVOIDANCE BEHAVIOR .2. INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN SUSCEPTIBILITIES
    STONE, GC
    PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGIA, 1965, 7 (04): : 283 - &
  • [38] Pathogen disgust sensitivity: Individual differences in pathogen perception or pathogen avoidance?
    van Leeuwen, Florian
    Jaeger, Bastian
    MOTIVATION AND EMOTION, 2022, 46 (03) : 394 - 403
  • [39] Pathogen disgust sensitivity: Individual differences in pathogen perception or pathogen avoidance?
    Florian van Leeuwen
    Bastian Jaeger
    Motivation and Emotion, 2022, 46 : 394 - 403
  • [40] How cultural differences in uncertainty avoidance affect product perceptions
    Lee, Julie Anne
    Garbarino, Ellen
    Lerman, Dawn
    INTERNATIONAL MARKETING REVIEW, 2007, 24 (03) : 330 - 349