Lithofacies classification and its controls on the pore structure distribution in Permian transitional shale in the northeastern Ordos Basin, China

被引:27
|
作者
Xue, Chunqi [1 ]
Wu, Jianguang [2 ]
Qiu, Longwei [1 ]
Zhong, Jianhua [1 ]
Zhang, Shouren [2 ]
Zhang, Bing [2 ]
Wu, Xiang [2 ]
Hao, Bing [1 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Petr East China, Coll Geosci, Qingdao 266580, Peoples R China
[2] China United Coalbed Methane, Beijing 100011, Peoples R China
关键词
Transitional shale; Lithofacies; Pore structure; Controlling factors; Ordos basin; METHANE ADSORPTION CAPACITY; MISSISSIPPIAN BARNETT SHALE; NATURAL-GAS ACCUMULATIONS; COAL-BEARING STRATA; ORGANIC-RICH SHALE; FORT-WORTH BASIN; SICHUAN BASIN; JIAOSHIBA AREA; FRACTAL CHARACTERISTICS; LONGMAXI SHALE;
D O I
10.1016/j.petrol.2020.107657
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Sea level changes more frequently during the deposition of transitional shale than marine shale, resulting in the strong heterogeneity and instability of the sedimentary environment and making transitional shale gas evaluation difficult. The appropriate identification and classification of transitional shale lithofacies types can improve evaluation of shale reservoirs and can provide the geological basis for the evaluation and potential of shale gas reservoirs during exploration and development. The lower Permian shale in the northeastern Ordos Basin is selected as the focus of this research. Based on X-ray diffraction (XRD), total organic content (TOC), vitrinite reflectance (R-o), nitrogen and carbon dioxide adsorption, and argon ion polishing scanning electron microscopy (AIP-SEM) data, the lower Permian transitional shale in the study area is divided into silty mudstone and muddy siltstone lithofacies. On this basis, the differences in the organic geochemical characteristics, pore development characteristics and influencing factors of the shale reservoir in the two lithofacies are compared. The results show that the mean values of w(TOC) and w(Ro) in the muddy siltstone lithofacies are 1.9% and 1.0%, respectively. Siliceous minerals dominate the composition of the rock, and the main types of reservoir spaces are mineral matrix pores, including interparticle (interP) pores and intraparticle (intraP) pores related to inorganic minerals. Macropores and mesopores are the main components of the pore volume, and account for 40.8% and 49.8% of the total volume, respectively. The pore structure is mainly affected by the TOC and siliceous mineral contents. In the silty mudstone lithofacies, the average values of w(TOC) and w(Ro) are 2.4% and 1.2%, respectively. The clay mineral content is relatively high. The main types of reservoir spaces are organic pores and interP pores. Additionally, the pore volumes of macropores, mesopores and micropores are almost the same, accounting for 24.9%, 44.6% and 30.4% of the total pore volume, respectively. The pore structure is mainly affected by the organic matter content and clay mineral content.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Shale gas potential of Ordovician marine Pingliang shale and Carboniferous-Permian transitional Taiyuan-Shanxi shales in the Ordos Basin, China
    Nie, H. K.
    Chen, Q.
    Li, P.
    Dang, W.
    Zhang, J. C.
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF EARTH SCIENCES, 2023, 70 (03) : 411 - 422
  • [32] Opportunities in Measuring Multiscale Pore Structure of the Continental Shale of the Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin, China
    Li, Yanyan
    Zhang, Zhihong
    Wei, Siyu
    Yang, Peng
    Shang, Yanjun
    ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (17)
  • [33] Lithofacies and pore features of marine-continental transitional shale and gas enrichment conditions of favorable lithofacies: A case study of Permian Longtan Formation in the Lintanchang area, southeast of Sichuan Basin, SW China
    Wang E.
    Guo T.
    Liu B.
    Li M.
    Xiong L.
    Dong X.
    Zhang N.
    Wang T.
    Shiyou Kantan Yu Kaifa/Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2022, 49 (06): : 1132 - 1142
  • [34] Characteristics and origin of desorption gas of a transitional shale: A case study from the Lower Permian Taiyuan Formation shale, Ordos Basin, northern China
    Xu, Liang
    Wang, Yongli
    Wei, Zhifu
    Wu, Baoxiang
    Zhang, Mingfeng
    Wang, Gen
    Sun, Zepeng
    PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 35 (24) : 2262 - 2268
  • [35] Lithofacies and pore features of marine-continental transitional shale and gas enrichment conditions of favorable lithofacies: A case study of Permian Longtan Formation in the Lintanchang area, southeast of Sichuan Basin, SW China
    WANG, Enze
    GUO, Tonglou
    LIU, Bo
    LI, Maowen
    XIONG, Liang
    DONG, Xiaoxia
    ZHANG, Nanxi
    WANG, Tong
    PETROLEUM EXPLORATION AND DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 49 (06) : 1310 - 1322
  • [36] Pore characterization of marine-continental transitional shale in Permian Shanxi Formation of The Southern North China Basin
    Yang, Xiaoguang
    Guo, Shaobin
    ENERGY EXPLORATION & EXPLOITATION, 2020, 38 (06) : 2199 - 2216
  • [37] Nano-Scale Pore Structure of Marine-Continental Transitional Shale from Liulin Area, the Eastern Margin of Ordos Basin, China
    Xi, Zhaodong
    Tang, Shuheng
    Zhang, Songhang
    Li, Jun
    JOURNAL OF NANOSCIENCE AND NANOTECHNOLOGY, 2017, 17 (09) : 6109 - 6123
  • [38] Sedimentology and Geochemistry of the Lower Permian Shanxi Formation Shan 23 Submember Transitional Shale, Eastern Ordos Basin, North China
    Gu, Yifan
    Li, Xingtao
    Qi, Lin
    Li, Shuxin
    Jiang, Yuqiang
    Fu, Yonghong
    Yang, Xiaoshuai
    FRONTIERS IN EARTH SCIENCE, 2022, 10
  • [39] Pore Structure Characteristics of Shale Oil Reservoirs with Different Lithofacies and Their Effects on Mobility of Movable Fluids: A Case Study of the Chang 7 Member in the Ordos Basin, China
    Xiao, Yufang
    Ye, Zhengqin
    Wang, Hongliang
    Yang, Hailong
    Mu, Nana
    Ji, Xinyuan
    Zhao, He
    ENERGIES, 2024, 17 (04)
  • [40] Compositional controls on pore-size distribution by nitrogen adsorption technique in the Lower Permian Shanxi Shales, Ordos Basin
    Yang, Chao
    Zhang, Jinchuan
    Han, Shuangbiao
    Wang, Xiangzeng
    Wang, Lin
    Yu, Wenwu
    Wang, Zhenguo
    JOURNAL OF NATURAL GAS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2016, 34 : 1369 - 1381