Investment Valuation of Underground Freight Transportation Systems under Uncertainty

被引:9
|
作者
Zahed, S. E. [1 ]
Shahandashti, S. M. [1 ]
Diltz, J. D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Arlington, Dept Civil Engn, 416 S Yates St, Arlington, TX 76010 USA
[2] Univ Texas Arlington, Dept Finance & Real Estate, POB 19449,701 S West St,Suite 434, Arlington, TX 76019 USA
关键词
MINIMUM REVENUE GUARANTEE; REAL OPTIONS; MODEL; TIME;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000568
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Investment valuation of underground freight transportation (UFT) systems is subject to a high level of uncertainties, including construction cost fluctuations and shipment revenue variations. Real options analysis is known as a promising approach for investment valuation of transportation projects under uncertainty. However, the extant real options approaches are theoretically deficient to appropriately model the UFT uncertainties with heterogeneous stochastic behaviors. While fluctuations in the construction cost of transportation projects typically follow the geometric Brownian motion (GBM) process, freight rate variation is a mean-reverting process. For the first time, a bivariate real options model is developed for investment valuation of UFT systems considering both these underlying uncertainties. A calibration approach is established to customize the model for capturing both GBM and mean-reverting attributes of the uncertainties. Also, a dynamic programming approach is adopted to identify the optimal time to invest in a UFT system. Finally, an illustrative case example is used to show the step-by-step implementation of the proposed model. Although the net present value (NPV) analysis showed this UFT case example is not financially viable, the proposed real options model demonstrated that this investment becomes quite promising if future contingent outcomes and the value of decision-making flexibilities are taken into account. The proposed model provides transportation capital planners with an optimal policy scheme that offers a timeline for viable investment in UFT systems. The presented model can also be used for investment valuation of other transportation development projects that involve two uncertainties with GBM and mean-reverting stochastic characteristics.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Simulation of intermodal freight transportation systems: a taxonomy
    Crainic, Teodor Gabriel
    Perboli, Guido
    Rosano, Mariangela
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2018, 270 (02) : 401 - 418
  • [42] Intermodal network design in freight transportation systems
    Tran Quynh Le
    Rianmora, Suchada
    Kewcharoenwong, Panitan
    2018 THIRTEENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE, INFORMATION AND CREATIVITY SUPPORT SYSTEMS (KICSS), 2018, : 13 - 18
  • [43] Capacity calculation for freight transportation network under comprehensive transportation system
    Liu, Jie
    He, Shi-Wei
    Song, Rui
    Jiang, Jin-Liang
    Jilin Daxue Xuebao (Gongxueban)/Journal of Jilin University (Engineering and Technology Edition), 2012, 42 (02): : 334 - 338
  • [44] Ecosystem valuation under uncertainty and irreversibility
    Chavas, JP
    ECOSYSTEMS, 2000, 3 (01) : 11 - 15
  • [45] Ecosystem Valuation under Uncertainty and Irreversibility
    Jean-Paul Chavas
    Ecosystems, 2000, 3 : 11 - 15
  • [46] The transportation problem under uncertainty
    Pavlov A.A.
    Zhdanova E.G.
    Journal of Automation and Information Sciences, 2020, 52 (04): : 1 - 13
  • [47] Foreign direct investment and investment under uncertainty
    Rivoli, P
    Salorio, E
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS STUDIES, 1996, 27 (02) : 335 - 357
  • [48] Building Resilience into Freight Transportation Systems Actions for State Departments of Transportation
    Ta, Chilan
    Goodchild, Anne V.
    Ivanov, Barbara
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2010, (2168) : 129 - 135
  • [49] INVESTMENT EVALUATION UNDER UNCERTAINTY
    BLATT, JM
    FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 1979, 8 (02) : 66 - 81
  • [50] INVESTMENT DECISION UNDER UNCERTAINTY
    WELLS, HM
    JOURNAL OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN INSTITUTE OF MINING AND METALLURGY, 1976, 76 (09): : 375 - 382