Impact of gestational diabetes mellitus on maternal cardiac adaptation to pregnancy

被引:27
|
作者
Buddeberg, B. S. [1 ]
Sharma, R. [2 ]
O'Driscoll, J. M. [2 ,3 ]
Agten, A. Kaelin [4 ,5 ]
Khalil, A. [4 ,5 ]
Thilaganathan, B. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Basel, Dept Anesthesiol, Spitalstr 21, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland
[2] St Georges Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Cardiol, London, England
[3] Canterbury Christ Church Univ, Sch Human & Life Sci, Canterbury, Kent, England
[4] Univ London, St Georges Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Fetal Med Unit, London, England
[5] St Georges Univ London, Vasc Biol Res Ctr, Mol & Clin Sci Res Inst, London, England
关键词
cardiac dysfunction; diastolic dysfunction; echocardiography; gestational diabetes; pregnancy; speckle tracking; METABOLIC SYNDROME IMPACT; EUROPEAN-ASSOCIATION; AMERICAN-SOCIETY; DIASTOLIC FUNCTION; RIGHT HEART; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; DYSFUNCTION; GUIDELINES; MECHANICS; RECOMMENDATIONS;
D O I
10.1002/uog.21941
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objective To determine whether maternal cardiac adaptation at term differs between women with, and those without, gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Methods This was a prospective case- control study of pregnant women at term with or without GDM. For both cases and controls, only women without any comorbidity or form of pre-existing diabetes who had a singleton pregnancy without complication (such as pre-eclampsia or fetal growth restriction) were included. All women underwent conventional and speckle-tracking echocardiography to assess both the left- and right-heart geometry and function. Results A total of 40 women with GDM and 40 healthy controls were enrolled. Women with GDM, compared with controls, had a significantly higher heart rate (83 +/- 10 vs 75 +/- 9 beats per min; P< 0.001), left ventricular (LV) relative wall thickness (0.43 +/- 0.07 vs 0.37 +/- 0.08; P< 0.001), LV early diastolic transmitral valve velocity (E) (0.80 +/- 0.15 vs 0.73 +/- 0.12 m/s; P= 0.026) and LV late diastolic transmitral valve velocity (A) (0.65 +/- 0.13 vs 0.57 +/- 0.11 m/s; P= 0.006). In women with GDM compared with controls, speckle-tracking analysis revealed a significant reduction in LV global longitudinal strain (GLS) (-16.29 +/- 2.26 vs -17.61 +/- 1.89; P= 0.012), LV endocardial GLS (-18.50 +/- 2.59 vs -19.84 +/- 2.35; P= 0.031) and LV epicardial GLS (-14.40 +/- 2.01 vs -15.73 +/- 1.66; P= 0.005). Right ventricular (RV) analysis revealed a reduced pulmonary acceleration time (58 +/- 10 vs 66 +/- 11 ms; P= 0.001) and RV E/A ratio (1.13 +/- 0.18 vs 1.29 +/- 0.35; P= 0.017), as well as a higher RV myocardial systolic annular velocity (0.16 +/- 0.04 vs 0.14 +/- 0.02; P= 0.023) and peak late diastolic transtricuspid valve velocity (0.46 +/- 0.1 m/s vs 0.39 +/- 0.08 m/s; P= 0.001), in women with GDM compared to controls. Conclusions Our findings show that even a short period of exposure to hyperglycemia, as occcurs in women with GDM, is associated with significant maternal functional cardiac impairment at term. Given these findings, further study of postnatal maternal cardiovascular recovery after GDM pregnancy is warranted. Copyright (C) 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:240 / 246
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Maternal Early Pregnancy Serum Metabolites and Risk of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus
    Enquobahrie, Daniel A.
    Denis, Marie
    Tadesse, Mahlet G.
    Gelaye, Bizu
    Ressom, Habtom W.
    Williams, Michelle A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2015, 100 (11): : 4348 - 4356
  • [12] Maternal use of antidepressant medication in pregnancy and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus
    Lupattelli, Angela
    Barone-Adesi, Francesco
    Nordeng, Hedvig
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2020, 29 : 530 - 530
  • [13] Maternal circulating leptin profile during pregnancy and gestational diabetes mellitus
    Xiao, Wan-Qing
    He, Jian-Rong
    Shen, Song-Ying
    Lu, Jin-Hua
    Kuang, Ya-Shu
    Wei, Xue-Ling
    Qiu, Xiu
    DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2020, 161
  • [14] Twin Pregnancy Complicated by Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes
    Das, Devika
    Christie, Hannah E.
    Hegazi, Moustafa
    Takawy, Marina
    Pone, Karina A.
    Vella, Adrian
    Egan, Aoife M.
    JOURNAL OF THE ENDOCRINE SOCIETY, 2024, 8 (06)
  • [15] Impact of maternal height and gestational diabetes mellitus on offspring birthweight
    Masalin, Senja
    Laine, Merja K.
    Kautiainen, Hannu
    Gissler, Mika
    Raina, Marko
    Pennanen, Pirjo
    Eriksson, Johan G.
    DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2019, 148 : 110 - 118
  • [16] The impact of lockdown on maternal and neonatal morbidity in gestational diabetes mellitus
    Tollini, Valentine
    Lemaitre, Madleen
    Garabedian, Charles
    Martin, Claire
    Bengler, Cyril
    Vambergue, Anne
    Ghesquiere, Louise
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 227 (05) : 775 - 777
  • [17] IMPACT OF GESTATIONAL DIABETES MELLITUS ON PREGNANCY OUTCOMES IN JAPANESE WOMEN
    Nomachi, S.
    Watanabe, H.
    Honda, Y.
    Fukuda, S.
    Sato, Y.
    Sugiyama, T.
    DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2014, 106 : S208 - S208
  • [18] The impact of oral biguanide-metformin on maternal cardiac output in pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus
    Ansari, Faiza
    Thirunavukarasu, Sharmaine
    Chowdhary, Amrit
    Levelt, Eylem
    Everett, Thomas
    Scott, Eleanor
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2023, 130 : 99 - 99
  • [19] Detraining of the heart: impact of exercise practice exclusively during gestational diabetes mellitus on maternal cardiac mitochondria
    Tocantins, C.
    Rodrigues, O. M.
    Martins, J. D.
    Grilo, L. F.
    Diniz, M. S.
    Stevanovic--Silva, J.
    Beleza, J.
    Coxito, P.
    Rizo--Roca, D.
    Santos--Alves, E.
    Rios, M.
    Moreno, A. J.
    Ascensao, A.
    Magalhaes, J.
    Oliveira, P. J.
    Pereira, S. P.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 2022, 52
  • [20] Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and the Maternal Heart
    Nolan, Christopher J.
    DIABETES CARE, 2022, 45 (12) : 2820 - 2822