Greenhouse gas emission accounting for EU member states from 1991 to 2012

被引:23
|
作者
Su, Meirong [1 ,2 ]
Pauleit, Stephan [2 ]
Yin, Xuemei [1 ]
Zheng, Ying [1 ]
Chen, Shaoqing [1 ]
Xu, Chao [2 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Normal Univ, Sch Environm, State Key Joint Lab Environm Simulat & Pollut Con, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[2] Tech Univ Munich, Strateg Landscape Planning & Management, Emil Ramann Str 6, D-85354 Freising Weihenstephan, Germany
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金;
关键词
GHG emission accounting; Emission structure; Sectoral source and sink; Classified management; EU; GHG EMISSIONS; DECOMPOSITION ANALYSIS; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; STRUCTURAL-CHANGE; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; TRADING SCHEME; BALTIC STATES; EUROPE; DRIVERS; IMPLEMENTATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.02.074
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Collectively, the EU is among the world's largest greenhouse gas (GHG) emitters, though remarkable decreases in GHG emissions have been observed in recent years. In this work the GHG emissions for the 28 EU member states between 1991 and 2012 are accounted for and compared according to the inventory method of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). The structure of GHG emissions at a national level, their distribution between countries, and trends across the period are then analyzed. National emission sources and sinks are decomposed for each country to elucidate the contribution of each sector (energy, industrial processes, solvents and other product use, agriculture, land use/landuse change and forestry, and waste) to the national totals. Germany was the largest emitter, with net emissions totaling 939 Tg CO2 equivalent in 2012, 60% more than the UK and 89% more than France, the second and third biggest emitters, respectively. The energy sector and agriculture were found to be the largest sources of emissions in most countries. Four quadrants were established to compare countries' performance in emission intensity, carbon removal rate, and net reduction rate of GHG emissions. Slovenia, Portugal, Sweden, and Finland were located in Quadrant II as they displayed relatively low emission intensities and high carbon removal rates. Conversely, Hungary, Greece, Cyprus, the Czech Republic, and Poland were located in Quadrant IV because of their relatively high emission intensities and low carbon removal rates. Some suggestions for integrating the annual results and the trends both within and among countries into national and regional emissions reduction strategies are also included. The unified accounting framework mid analysis of the structure of GHG emissions may also be useful for other countries and regions. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:759 / 768
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] An estimate of greenhouse gas emission in Republic of Croatia until the year 2012
    Grzin, Erika
    Tadic, Davorin
    Pupavac, Drago
    ANNALS OF DAAAM FOR 2007 & PROCEEDINGS OF THE 18TH INTERNATIONAL DAAAM SYMPOSIUM: INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING & AUTOMATION: FOCUS ON CREATIVITY, RESPONSIBILITY, AND ETHICS OF ENGINEERS, 2007, : 311 - 312
  • [32] A carbon accounting tool for complex and uncertain greenhouse gas emission life cycles
    Pichancourt, Jean-Baptiste
    Manso, Ruben
    Ningre, Francois
    Fortin, Mathieu
    ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2018, 107 : 158 - 174
  • [33] Comparison of greenhouse gas emission accounting for a constructed wetland wastewater treatment system
    Gao, R. Y.
    Shao, Ling
    Li, J. S.
    Guo, S.
    Han, M. Y.
    Meng, J.
    Liu, J. B.
    Xu, F. X.
    Lin, Cong
    ECOLOGICAL INFORMATICS, 2012, 12 : 85 - 92
  • [34] Debt and convergence: Evidence from the EU member states
    Rant, Vasja
    Marinc, Matej
    Porenta, Jan
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2021, 39
  • [35] Withdrawal from the EU: Are member states still sovereign?
    Klabbers, J
    COMMON MARKET LAW REVIEW, 2001, 38 (06): : 1616 - 1617
  • [36] Greenhouse gas emission from livestock in Brazil
    Lima, MA
    Campanhola, C
    GREENHOUSE GASES AND ANIMAL AGRICULTURE, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, : 35 - 39
  • [37] Modeling of Greenhouse Gas Emission from Livestock
    Jose, V. Sanjo
    Sejian, Veerasamy
    Bagath, Madiajagan
    Ratnakaran, Athira P.
    Lees, Angela M.
    Al-Hosni, Yaqoub A. S.
    Sullivan, Megan
    Bhatta, Raghavendra
    Gaughan, John B.
    FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2016, 4
  • [38] Mapping the EU tomato supply chain from farm to fork for greenhouse gas emission mitigation strategies
    Xue, Li
    Cao, Zhi
    Scherhaufer, Silvia
    Ostergren, Karin
    Cheng, Shengkui
    Liu, Gang
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2021, 25 (02) : 390 - 402
  • [39] Accounting for greenhouse gas emissions from the degradation of chemicals in the environment
    Ivan Muñoz
    Giles Rigarlsford
    Llorenç Milà i Canals
    Henry King
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2013, 18 : 252 - 262
  • [40] Greenhouse gas accounting and emission reduction in prefabricated construction: insights from extended input-output analysis
    Zhao, Yu
    Zhang, Jixiang
    Li, Sui
    Yu, Miao
    CONSTRUCTION INNOVATION-ENGLAND, 2025,