Adjoint sensitivity analysis of ozone nonattainment over the continental United States

被引:50
|
作者
Hakami, Amir [1 ]
Seinfeld, John H.
Chai, Tianfeng
Tang, You Hua
Carmichael, Gregory R.
Sandu, Adrian
机构
[1] CALTECH, Dept Chem Engn, Pasadena, CA 91125 USA
[2] CALTECH, Dept Environm Sci & Engn, Pasadena, CA 91125 USA
[3] Univ Iowa, Ctr Global & Reg Environm Res, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[4] Virginia Polytech Inst & State Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1021/es052135g
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
An application of the adjoint method in air quality management is demonstrated. We use a continental scale chemical transport model ( STEM) to calculate the sensitivities of a nationwide U. S. ozone national ambient air quality standard ( NAAQS) nonattainment metric to precursor emissions for the period July 1 to August 15, 2004. The model shows low bias and error (- 4 and 24%, respectively), particularly for areas with high ozone concentrations. The nonattainment metric accounts for both 1-h and 8-h ozone standards, but is dominated by the 8-h exceedances ( 97% of the combined metric). Largest values of sensitivities are found to be with respect to emissions in the south and southeast U. S., Ohio River Valley, and California. When nonattainment sensitivities are integrated over the entire U. S., NO x emissions account for the largest contribution ( 62% of the total), followed by biogenic and anthropogenic VOCs ( 24% and 14%, respectively). For NO x emissions, point/area and mobile sources account for 54% and 46% of the total sensitivities, respectively. We also provide a state-by-state comparison for the nonattainment magnitude, nonattainment sensitivity, and emission magnitudes to explore the influence of interstate transport of ozone and its precursors, and policy implications of the results. Our analysis of the nationwide ozone nonattainment metric suggests that simple cap-and-trade programs may prove inadequate in achieving sought-after air quality objectives.
引用
收藏
页码:3855 / 3864
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Analysis of process controls in land surface hydrological cycle over the continental United States
    Syed, TH
    Lakshmi, V
    Paleologos, E
    Lohmann, D
    Mitchell, K
    Famiglietti, JS
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2004, 109 (D22) : 1 - 11
  • [22] Evaluation of an annual simulation of ozone and fine particulate matter over the continental United States - Which temporal features are captured?
    Hogrefe, C.
    Jones, J. M.
    Gilliland, A.
    Porter, P. S.
    Gego, E.
    Gilliam, R.
    Swall, J.
    Irwin, J.
    Rao, S. T.
    AIR POLLUTION MODELING AND ITS APPLICATIONS XVII, 2007, 17 : 562 - +
  • [23] BACKGROUND CONTINENTAL OZONE LEVELS IN THE RURAL UNITED-STATES SOUTHWEST DESERT
    HOFFER, TE
    FARBER, RJ
    ELLIS, EC
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 1982, 23 (APR) : 17 - 30
  • [24] A hybrid model for spatially and temporally resolved ozone exposures in the continental United States
    Di, Qian
    Rowland, Sebastian
    Koutrakis, Petros
    Schwartz, Joel
    JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 2017, 67 (01) : 39 - 52
  • [25] Statistics of lower tropospheric inversions over the continental United States
    Zhang, Y. H.
    Zhang, S. D.
    Yi, F.
    Chen, Z. Y.
    ANNALES GEOPHYSICAE, 2011, 29 (02) : 401 - 410
  • [26] Multimodel Ensemble Reconstruction of Drought over the Continental United States
    Wang, Aihui
    Bohn, Theodore J.
    Mahanama, Sarith P.
    Koster, Randal D.
    Lettenmaier, Dennis P.
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2009, 22 (10) : 2694 - 2712
  • [27] SEASALT AND POLLUTION INPUTS OVER THE CONTINENTAL UNITED-STATES
    LI, YH
    WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 1992, 64 (3-4): : 561 - 573
  • [28] Ozone trends over the United States at different times of day
    Yan, Yingying
    Lin, Jintai
    He, Cenlin
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2018, 18 (02) : 1185 - 1202
  • [30] Increasing background ozone in surface air over the United States
    Lin, CYC
    Jacob, DJ
    Munger, JW
    Fiore, AM
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2000, 27 (21) : 3465 - 3468