Evaluating the Risk Assessment Approach of the REACH Legislation: A Case Study

被引:6
|
作者
Landberg, Hanna E. [1 ]
Hedmer, Maria [1 ]
Westberg, Hakan [2 ]
Tinnerberg, Hakan [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Div Occupat & Environm Med, Dept Lab Med, Fac Med, S-22185 Lund, Sweden
[2] Orebro Univ Hosp, Dept Occupat & Environm Med, Orebro, Sweden
[3] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Dept Occupat & Environm Med, S-40530 Gothenburg, Sweden
[4] Univ Gothenburg, S-40530 Gothenburg, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
exposure assessment; exposure assessment models; exposure scenarios; occupational hygiene; occupational exposure; REACH; risk assessment; risk characterization ratio; EXPOSURE; STOFFENMANAGER; TOOLS; RELIABILITY; INFORMATION; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1093/annweh/wxy090
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Risk assessments based on occupational exposure to chemicals have increased since REACH (European regulation on Registration, Evaluation, Authorization, and restriction of Chemicals) came into force. The European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) recommends that chemical exposure could be calculated using exposure models and that parameters used to calculate the exposure scenario (ES) should be communicated in extended safety data sheets (e-SDS) as workplace instructions which downstream users are obligated to follow. We aimed to evaluate REACH's risk assessment approach using the Stoffenmanager((R)) 6.1, the Advanced REACH Tool 1.5 (ART), and the European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals' targeted risk assessment (ECETOC TRA 3.1) exposure models. We observed 239 scenarios in three companies handling chemicals using 45 e-SDS. Risk characterization ratios (RCRs) were calculated by dividing estimated exposures by derived no-effect levels (DNELs). Observed RCRs were much lower than registered RCRs, indicating lower exposures. However, about 12% of the observed ES still had RCRs > 1, after adjustment for control measures and personal protections described in the ES, when using Stoffenmanager((R)). The ES with observed RCRs > 1 were the same by Stoffenmanager((R)) and ART, but not by ECETOC TRA. Stoffenmanager and ART identified 25 adjusted scenarios with RCR > 1, while ECETOC TRA gave RCR < 1 for the same scenarios. The ES with RCR > 1 were significantly associated to chemicals with higher vapour pressure and lower DNELs than ES with RCR < 1 by Stoffenmanager((R)). The correlations between observed and registered RCRs were lower than those between RCRs calculated from the different models themselves; ECETOC TRA had the lowest correlation with the registered ES. These results put in question the generic ES recommended under the REACH legislation. Downstream users may get better estimates by assessing their own ES, especially for chemicals with low DNELs and high vapour pressure.
引用
收藏
页码:68 / 76
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Use of read-across and tiered exposure assessment in risk assessment under REACH - A case study on a phase-in substance
    Vink, S. R.
    Mikkers, J.
    Bouwman, T.
    Marquart, H.
    Kroese, E. D.
    REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2010, 58 (01) : 64 - 71
  • [22] Threat assessment: Defining an approach for evaluating risk of targeted violence
    Borum, R
    Fein, R
    Vossekuil, B
    Berglund, J
    BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES & THE LAW, 1999, 17 (03) : 323 - 337
  • [23] Cybersecurity Risk Assessment Approach for Malaysian Organizations: Malaysian Universities as Case Study
    Aborujilah, Abdulaziz
    Al-Othmani, Abdulaleem Z.
    Hussien, Nur Syahela
    Mokhtar, Shamsul Anuar
    Long, Zalizah Awang
    Nizam, Mohd
    2022 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING (ICEEE 2022), 2022, : 440 - 450
  • [24] Next Generation Risk Assessment for consumer safety of cosmetics: A case study approach
    Westmoreland, C.
    TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2018, 295 : S18 - S18
  • [25] An approach for integrating toxicogenomic data in risk assessment: The dibutyl phthalate case study
    Euling, Susan Y.
    Thompson, Chad M.
    Chiu, Weihsueh A.
    Benson, Robert
    TOXICOLOGY AND APPLIED PHARMACOLOGY, 2013, 271 (03) : 324 - 335
  • [26] A Simplified Approach to Risk Assessment Based on System Dynamics: An Industrial Case Study
    Garbolino, Emmanuel
    Chery, Jean-Pierre
    Guarnieri, Franck
    RISK ANALYSIS, 2016, 36 (01) : 16 - 29
  • [27] A pulsed-dose study evaluating chronic toxicity of chlorothalonil to fish: A case study for environmental risk assessment
    Hamer, Mick
    Maynard, Samuel K.
    Schneider, Suzanne
    ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 2019, 38 (07) : 1549 - 1559
  • [28] Does EU legislation allow the use of the Benchmark dose (BMD) approach for risk assessment?
    Brandon, E. F. A.
    Bulder, A. S.
    van Engelen, J. G. M.
    Mahieu, C. M.
    Mennes, W. C.
    Pronk, M. E. J.
    Rietveld, A. G.
    van de Ven, B. M.
    ten Voorde, S. E. C. G.
    Wolterink, G.
    Slob, W.
    Zeilmaker, M. J.
    Bessems, J. G. M.
    REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2013, 67 (02) : 182 - 188
  • [29] Pesticides in drinking water: a risk assessment approach and contribution to the Brazilian legislation updating process
    Fernandes Neto, Maria de Lourdes
    Sarcinelli, Paula de Novaes
    ENGENHARIA SANITARIA E AMBIENTAL, 2009, 14 (01) : 69 - 78
  • [30] Case study: Product risk assessment
    Esker, Donald
    Gauss, Robert
    SCIENTIST, 2006, 20 (11): : 41 - 41