A Comparison of Breeding and Ensemble Transform Vectors for Global Ensemble Generation

被引:5
|
作者
Deng Guo [1 ]
Tian Hua [1 ]
Li Xiaoli [1 ]
Chen Jing [1 ]
Gong Jiandong [1 ]
Jiao Meiyan
机构
[1] China Meteorol Adm, Natl Meteorol Ctr, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
来源
ACTA METEOROLOGICA SINICA | 2012年 / 26卷 / 01期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
breeding; ensemble transform; ensemble prediction system; NCEP; SKILL;
D O I
10.1007/s13351-012-0105-4
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
To compare the initial perturbation techniques using breeding vectors and ensemble transform vectors, three ensemble prediction systems using both initial perturbation methods but with different ensemble member sizes based on the spectral model T213/L31 are constructed at the National Meteorological Center, China Meteorological Administration (NMC/CMA). A series of ensemble verification scores such as forecast skill of the ensemble mean, ensemble resolution, and ensemble reliability are introduced to identify the most important attributes of ensemble forecast systems. The results indicate that the ensemble transform technique is superior to the breeding vector method in light of the evaluation of anomaly correlation coefficient (ACC), which is a deterministic character of the ensemble mean, the root-mean-square error (RMSE) and spread, which are of probabilistic attributes, and the continuous ranked probability score (CRPS) and its decomposition. The advantage of the ensemble transform approach is attributed to its orthogonality among ensemble perturbations as well as its consistence with the data assimilation system. Therefore, this study may serve as a reference for configuration of the best ensemble prediction system to be used in operation.
引用
收藏
页码:52 / 61
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Ensemble updating of categorical state vectors
    Margrethe Kvale Loe
    Håkon Tjelmeland
    Computational Statistics, 2022, 37 : 2363 - 2397
  • [22] Covariance localization in the ensemble transform Kalman filter based on an augmented ensemble
    Wang, Jichao
    Li, Jiacheng
    Zang, Shaodong
    Yang, Jungang
    Wu, Guoli
    OCEAN AND COASTAL RESEARCH, 2020, 68
  • [23] Ensemble transform Kalman filter perturbations for a regional ensemble prediction system
    Bowler, Neill E.
    Mylne, Kenneth R.
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2009, 135 (640) : 757 - 766
  • [24] A comparison of hybrid ensemble transform Kalman filter-optimum interpolation and ensemble square root filter analysis schemes
    Wang, Xuguang
    Hamill, Thomas A.
    Whitaker, Jeffrey S.
    Bishop, Craig H.
    MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW, 2007, 135 (03) : 1055 - 1076
  • [25] A Comparison of Two Ensemble Generation Methods Using Oceanic Singular Vectors and Atmospheric Lagged Initialization for Decadal Climate Prediction
    Marini, Camille
    Polkova, Iuliia
    Koehl, Armin
    Stammer, Detlef
    MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW, 2016, 144 (07) : 2719 - 2738
  • [26] Towards a GME ensemble forecasting system: Ensemble initialization using the breeding technique
    Keller, Jan D.
    Kornblueh, Luis
    Hense, Andreas
    Rhodin, Andreas
    METEOROLOGISCHE ZEITSCHRIFT, 2008, 17 (06) : 707 - 718
  • [27] Ensemble forecasting at NCEP and the breeding method
    Toth, Z
    Kalnay, E
    MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW, 1997, 125 (12) : 3297 - 3319
  • [28] A comparison of the ECMWF, MSC, and NCEP global ensemble prediction systems
    Buizza, R
    Houtekamer, PL
    Toth, Z
    Pellerin, G
    Wei, MZ
    Zhu, YJ
    MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW, 2005, 133 (05) : 1076 - 1097
  • [29] On the Impact of the Choice of Global Ensemble in Forcing a Regional Ensemble System
    Weidle, Florian
    Wang, Yong
    Smet, Geert
    WEATHER AND FORECASTING, 2016, 31 (02) : 515 - 530
  • [30] MULTILEVEL ENSEMBLE TRANSFORM PARTICLE FILTERING
    Gregory, A.
    Cotter, C. J.
    Reich, S.
    SIAM JOURNAL ON SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING, 2016, 38 (03): : A1317 - A1338