An Analysis of Cold Season Supercell Storms Using the Synthetic Dual-Doppler Technique

被引:10
|
作者
Murphy, Todd A. [1 ]
Knupp, Kevin R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama, Dept Atmospher Sci, Huntsville, AL 35805 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
PART I; THERMODYNAMIC VARIABLES; PRESSURE PERTURBATIONS; RADAR OBSERVATIONS; CONVECTIVE CLOUDS; MATCHING MODELS; FLANKING LINE; EVOLUTION; MOTION; INTENSITY;
D O I
10.1175/MWR-D-12-00035.1
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Cold season tornadic outbreaks occur with regularity in the southeastern United States; however, detailed analyses of parent supercell storms in the cold season environment (often low CAPE, high shear) are scarce. This is often because storms do not always move close enough to radars for a comprehensive single-Doppler analysis and significant topography or trees in the Southeast make it difficult for mobile radars to operate, thus limiting dual-Doppler coverage. However, during the Super Tuesday tornado outbreak of 5-6 February 2008, two tornadic supercell storms passed within 30-40 km of the Weather Surveillance Radar-1988 Doppler (WSR-88D) sites in Memphis and Nashville, Tennessee (KNQA and KOHX, respectively). The relative steadiness of these storms during passage, along with the large motion vector (from the southwest at 2025 m s (1)), allowed the application of a synthetic dual-Doppler (SDD) analysis. As such, a detailed analysis of these storms was completed, including examinations of low-level circulations, updraft strength and location, as well as retrievals and evaluations of perturbation pressure and the vertical pressure gradient. This study presents one of the first comprehensive analyses of cold season supercells using only one Doppler radar. Additionally, the relative success and failures of using the SDD technique on supercell storms are discussed. Major findings for the primary case include the updraft maximizing at a very low height (3.0 km AGL), and weak pressure forcing within the rear flank resulting in a nonexistent rear-flank downdraft (RFD).
引用
收藏
页码:602 / 624
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Polarimetric and Dual-Doppler Radar Observations of the Lipscomb County, Texas, Supercell Thunderstorm on 23 May 2002
    Frame, Jeffrey
    Markowski, Paul
    Richardson, Yvette
    Straka, Jerry
    Wurman, Joshua
    MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW, 2009, 137 (02) : 544 - 561
  • [22] High-resolution dual-Doppler analyses of the 29 May 2001 Kress, Texas, cyclic supercell
    Beck, Jeffrey R.
    Schroeder, John L.
    Wurman, Joshua M.
    MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW, 2006, 134 (11) : 3125 - 3148
  • [23] DUAL-DOPPLER RADAR ANALYSIS OF A FRONTAL CONVECTION LINE
    CAMPISTRON, B
    BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 1981, 62 (06) : 923 - 923
  • [24] DUAL-DOPPLER RADAR MEASUREMENTS OF WIND AND TURBULENCE AHEAD OF A COLD-FRONT
    GILET, M
    BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 1979, 60 (12) : 1496 - 1496
  • [25] A non-iterative dual-Doppler analysis of radar data
    Bousquet, O
    Chong, M
    28TH CONFERENCE ON RADAR METEOROLOGY, 1997, : 85 - 86
  • [26] VISUAL AND DUAL-DOPPLER ANALYSIS OF LOW-REFLECTIVITY MICROBURSTS
    WAKIMOTO, RM
    KESSINGER, CJ
    KINGSMILL, DE
    24TH CONFERENCE ON RADAR METEOROLOGY, 1989, : 77 - 80
  • [27] Dual-Doppler and Polarimetric Radar Analysis of Hail Events in Germany
    Evaristo, Raquel
    Troemel, Silke
    Simmer, Clemens
    2018 19TH INTERNATIONAL RADAR SYMPOSIUM (IRS), 2018,
  • [28] Dual-Doppler analysis in a single plane from an airborne platform
    Leon, D
    Vali, G
    Lothon, M
    JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 23 (01) : 3 - 22
  • [29] Single- and Dual-Doppler Analysis of a Tornadic Vortex and Surrounding Storm-Scale Flow in the Crowell, Texas, Supercell of 30 April 2000
    Marquis, James
    Richardson, Yvette
    Wurman, Joshua
    Markowski, Paul
    MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW, 2008, 136 (12) : 5017 - 5043
  • [30] Airborne dual-Doppler observations of a coastal wind maximum associated with a landfalling cold front
    Yu, CK
    Smull, BF
    Houze, RA
    Colle, BA
    SECOND CONFERENCE ON COASTAL ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC PREDICTION AND PROCESSES, 1998, : 206 - 209