Should macular erythema reactions be counted as positive allergic patch-test reactions?

被引:22
|
作者
Davis, MDP
Yiannias, JA
机构
[1] Mayo Clin & Mayo Fdn, Dept Dermatol, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Dept Dermatol, Scottsdale, AZ USA
关键词
D O I
10.2310/6620.2006.05020
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Background: Positive allergic patch-test results are generally described as erythematous papules, vesicles, or a spreading reaction with crust and ulceration. This description excludes milder reactions, including macular erythema. Objective Our aim was to investigate the prevalence and relevance of reactions graded as macular erythema at Mayo Clinic. Methods: Between January 2001 and June 2004, patients suspected of having allergic contact dermatitis were patch-tested with our institution's standard patch test, a screening series of 68 to 72 allergens. In total, 2,823 patients were patch-tested with 193,530 allergen applications. Reactions were interpreted with the North American Contact Dermatitis Group scale, including and excluding reactions graded as macular erythema. Irritant reactions were excluded from calculations. For this study, scores for current, questionable, and past relevance were combined. Results: On day 5, with the exclusion of reactions graded as irritant, 7,274 allergen applications were associated with reactions, including 3,082 (42.4%) that were graded as macular erythema. Of the macular erythema reactions, 2,430 (78.8%) were graded as relevant. The rate of reaction in our patients was 2.2% if macular erythema was excluded, 3.8% if all macular erythema reactions were included, and 3.4% if only those macular reactions deemed relevant were included. Conclusion: Patch-test reactions rated as macular erythema are common and may be of clinical relevance. For the purposes of patient education, they should not be disregarded. Consideration should be given to including these reactions when reporting patch-test results.
引用
收藏
页码:12 / 14
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Allergic and irritant patch test reactions and atopic disease
    Klas, PA
    Corey, G
    Storrs, FJ
    Chan, SC
    Hanifin, JM
    CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1996, 34 (02) : 121 - 124
  • [42] RED TATTOO REACTIONS - X-RAY-MICROANALYSIS AND PATCH-TEST STUDIES
    SOWDEN, JM
    BYRNE, JPH
    SMITH, AG
    HILEY, C
    SUAREZ, V
    WAGNER, B
    SLATER, DN
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 1991, 124 (06) : 576 - 580
  • [43] REACTIONS TO OTHER CORTICOSTEROIDS IN PATIENTS WITH POSITIVE PATCH TEST REACTIONS TO BUDESONIDE
    WILKINSON, M
    HOLLIS, S
    BECK, M
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 1995, 33 (06) : 963 - 968
  • [44] Gene profiling reveals a contact allergy signature in most positive Amerchol L-101 patch-test reactions
    Silic, Linda Ljungberg
    Lefevre, Marine-Alexia
    Bergendorff, Ola
    De Bernard, Simon
    Nourikyan, Julien
    Buffat, Laurent
    Nosbaum, Audrey
    Bruze, Magnus
    Nicolas, Jean-Francois
    Svedman, Cecilia
    Vocanson, Marc
    CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2022, 87 (01) : 40 - 52
  • [45] Skin reactions to sunscreens in a Victorian patch-test population: A cross-sectional study
    Higgins, C.
    Nixon, R. L.
    AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2016, 57 : 20 - 21
  • [46] A proposed relevance scoring system for positive allergic patch test reactions: Practical implications and limitations
    Lachapelle, JM
    CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1997, 36 (01) : 39 - 43
  • [47] Concomitant positive patch test reactions in FreeStyle-allergic patients sensitized to isobornyl acrylate
    Dendooven, Ella
    Foubert, Kenn
    Goossens, An
    Gilles, Philippe
    De Borggraeve, Wim
    Pieters, Luc
    Lambert, Julien
    Aerts, Olivier
    CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2021, 84 (03) : 166 - 174
  • [48] More positive patch test reactions with larger test chambers?
    Brasch, J
    Szliska, C
    Grabbe, J
    CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1997, 37 (03) : 118 - 120
  • [49] The development and course of patch-test reactions to 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate and ethyleneglycol dimethacrylate
    Isaksson, M
    Lindberg, M
    Sundberg, K
    Hallander, A
    Bruze, M
    CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2005, 53 (05) : 292 - 297
  • [50] Allergic contact dermatitis from 5-fluorouracil with positive intradermal test and doubtful patch test reactions
    Sánchez-Pérez, J
    Bartolomé, B
    del Rio, MJ
    García-Díez, A
    CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1999, 41 (02) : 106 - 107