Architectural Design for a Secure Linux Operating System

被引:0
|
作者
Narayanan, Hari [1 ]
Radhakrishnan, Vivek [1 ]
Shiju-Sathyadevan [1 ]
Poroor, Jayaraj [2 ]
机构
[1] Amrita Univ, Amrita Ctr Cybersecur Syst & Networks, Amrita Sch Engn, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Amritapuri, India
[2] EnergiMate, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India
关键词
Linux; authorization; principle of least privilege; security ticket; sandbox;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Operating system security is a hot research area for the past several decades. Various security mechanisms have been introduced till now to secure the operating system. In this paper we are focusing on securing Linux operating system. Even though Linux is open source and large numbers of people are involved in developing kernel patches for security holes, there are still many malwares to exploit the existing vulnerabilities. Using our architecture we are trying to minimize the damage done by the malwares if not blocking them altogether. Our architecture is designed to ensure the principle of least privilege. Principle of least privilege guarantees that a process will get the privileges just enough to perform its task. This ensures that even if the process is compromised it can do the least damage to the system as it is running in a sandbox. Major chunk of our system is running in the user level to make it portable across the distributions. Our system uses a specially structured security ticket to provide fine grained authorization to user processes which is not currently possible in the traditional linux architecture. The security ticket is designed in such a way that it can be inherited by a child process, can be shared and is unforgeable. The core module in the system is called Secd (Secure Daemon) which authorizes all the requests and also manages the security tickets.
引用
收藏
页码:949 / 953
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Linux operating system moving into library market
    不详
    LIBRARY JOURNAL, 2000, 125 (05) : 26 - 28
  • [22] OPTIMIZATION OF WORK PERFORMANCE WITH LINUX OPERATING SYSTEM
    Cristian, Vasile
    BANATS JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2010, 1 (02) : 79 - 82
  • [23] Design and implementation of secure Linux kernel security functions
    Shi, W.C.
    Sun, Y.F.
    Liang, H.L.
    Zhang, X.F.
    Zhao, Q.S.
    Shan, Z.Y.
    Jisuanji Yanjiu yu Fazhan/Computer Research and Development, 2001, 38 (10):
  • [24] Weighing the pros and cons of the Linux operating system
    Sierer, B
    R&D MAGAZINE, 2000, 42 (10): : 75 - 75
  • [25] Selecting an operating system, Part IV: Linux
    Balluder, Karsten
    Scales, John A.
    Schroeter, Claus
    Smith, Martin L.
    Computers in Physics, 1996, 10 (01):
  • [26] Startup process analysis of Linux operating system
    Changsha Tiedao Xueyuan Xuebao, 4 (29-32):
  • [27] A framework of system structure in secure operating system
    Wang, JH
    Luo, HQ
    Zhao, Q
    ICEMI'2003: PROCEEDINGS OF THE SIXTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRONIC MEASUREMENT & INSTRUMENTS, VOLS 1-3, 2003, : 63 - 66
  • [28] Secure communication for the Robot Operating System
    Breiling, Benjamin
    Dieber, Bernhard
    Schartner, Peter
    2017 11TH ANNUAL IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEMS CONFERENCE (SYSCON), 2017, : 360 - 365
  • [29] Architectural design of a secure forensic state psychiatric hospital
    Dvoskin, JA
    Radomski, SJ
    Bennett, C
    Olin, JA
    Hawkins, RL
    Dotson, LA
    Drewnicky, IN
    BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES & THE LAW, 2002, 20 (05) : 481 - 493
  • [30] Architectural and operating system support for orthogonal persistence
    Rosenberg, John
    Computing systems, 1992, 5 (03): : 305 - 335