Comparative study of two low CO2 emission power generation system options with natural gas reforming

被引:9
|
作者
Zhang, Na [1 ]
Lior, Noam [2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Engn Thermophys, Beijing 100080, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Penn, Dept Mech Engn & Appl Mech, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1115/1.2904895
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
Two power plant schemes that reduce CO2 emission and employ natural gas reforming were analyzed and discussed. The first one integrates natural gas reforming technology for efficiency improvement with an oxy-fuel combined power system (OXYF-REF), with water as the main work fluid. The reforming heat is obtained from the available turbine exhaust heat, and the produced syngas is used as fuel with oxygen as the oxidizer. The turbine working fluid can expand down to a vacuum, producing a high-pressure ratio and thus more net work. The second system integrates natural gas reforming in a precombustion decarbonization scheme using chemical absorption technology for the CO2 removal (PCD-REF). The gas turbine is the conventional air-based one with compressor intercooling. Supplementary combustion is employed to elevate the turbine exhaust temperature and thus achieve a much higher methane conversion rate (96.9%). Both systems involve internal heat recuperation from gas turbine exhausts, and particular attention has been paid to the integration of the heat recovery chain to reduce the related exergy destruction. The systems are simulated and their thermal efficiency, overall and component exergy losses, and CO2 removal capacity are compared. The OXYF-REF system has a higher energy efficiency, of 51.4%, and higher CO2 removal, but the product CO2 has lower purity, of 84%. The PCD-REF system has a thermal efficiency of 46%, the captured CO2 is 99% pure, and the CO2 specific emission is 58.5 g/kW h.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Perspective of catalysts for (Tri) reforming of natural gas and flue gas rich in CO2
    Schmal, Martin
    Toniolo, Fabio S.
    Kozonoe, Camila E.
    APPLIED CATALYSIS A-GENERAL, 2018, 568 : 23 - 42
  • [32] CO2 emission coupled power generation mix evolution: A system dynamics approach
    Peng, Guangbo
    Xiang, Yue
    ENERGY REPORTS, 2022, 8 : 597 - 604
  • [33] Zero CO2 emission SOLRGT power system
    Luo, Chending
    Zhang, Na
    ENERGY, 2012, 45 (01) : 312 - 323
  • [34] Study on Power Generation Expansion Planning Model Based on CO2 Emission Reduction
    Li, Yu
    Li, Chaoci
    Wen, Jingya
    MECHANICAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING IV, 2014, 472 : 856 - 860
  • [35] Analysis of gas-steam combined cycles with natural gas reforming and CO2 capture
    Corradetti, A
    Desideri, U
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2005, 127 (03): : 545 - 552
  • [36] Power generation cycle with chemical recuperation by CO2/NG reforming of methane
    School of Chemistry Engineering, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China
    Dongnan Daxue Xuebao, 2006, 5 (790-794):
  • [37] Integration of IGCC and methane reforming process for power generation with CO2 capture
    Ahmed, Usama
    Kim, Changsoo
    Zahid, Umer
    Lee, Chul-Jin
    Han, Chonghun
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING AND PROCESSING-PROCESS INTENSIFICATION, 2017, 111 : 14 - 24
  • [38] PERFORMANCE OPTIMIZATION OF SUPERCRITICAL CO2 GAS HEATER IN A BIOMASS-CO2 POWER GENERATION SYSTEM
    Zhang, X.
    Ge, Y. T.
    JOURNAL OF ENHANCED HEAT TRANSFER, 2023, 30 (08) : 1 - 28
  • [39] Energy system with near zero CO2 emission fueled by both coal and natural gas
    Institute of Engineering Thermophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
    不详
    Kung Cheng Je Wu Li Hsueh Pao, 2008, 6 (911-914): : 911 - 914
  • [40] Effect of supplementary firing options on cycle performance and CO2 emissions of an IGCC power generation system
    Gnanapragasam, N. V.
    Reddy, B. V.
    Rosen, M. A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, 2009, 33 (07) : 645 - 661