Assessment of distributions for fitting lag times of individual cells in bacterial populations

被引:19
|
作者
McKellar, RC [1 ]
Hawke, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Agr & Agri Food Canada, Food Res Program, Guelph, ON N1G 5C9, Canada
关键词
Escherichia coli O157 : H7; lag; growth; distributions; lognormal; mathematical models; predictive microbiology;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2005.06.018
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
To develop mathematical models describing lag times of individual bacterial cells (tau), experimental tau data were fitted to a variety of continuous distributions using BestFit. Six strains of Escherichia coli O157:H7 were used, and serial dilutions were made in Bioscreen multi-well plates to get single cells per well. Detection times (t(d)) for individual wells were converted to tau using the maximum specific growth rate (mu) for each strain. All strains were subject to 25 trials, with up to 100 replicate wells per trial. Some strains had significantly longer t(d), and lower mu, but the tau values were not significantly different. Distributions were best fit in the order Pearson V>Pearson VI>Extrerne Value>Lognormal>Lognormal2>Inverse Gaussian based on the Anderson-Darling statistic. The Lognormal distribution was selected because there was less variability in the parameter values, and parameters have specific biological meanings. Distributions could be fit to sample populations as low as six, with fittings and parameter values comparable to those obtained with larger samples (up to 89). Extreme Value, Pearson V, and Pearson VI distributions were more suitable for fitting tau values generated from a Lognormal distribution when the numbers of sample points were few, which suggested that there are similarities between the distributions. The results suggest that a Lognormal distribution can be used successfully to characterize tau. Crown Copyright (C) 2005 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:169 / 175
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Bacterial populations recorded in bacteriohopanepolyol distributions in soils from Northern England
    Cooke, Martin P.
    Talbot, Helen M.
    Farrimond, Paul
    ORGANIC GEOCHEMISTRY, 2008, 39 (09) : 1347 - 1358
  • [32] Simulation and evaluation of different statistical functions for describing lag time distributions of a bacterial growth curve
    Huang, Lihan
    MICROBIAL RISK ANALYSIS, 2016, 1 : 47 - 55
  • [33] Quantitative assessment of individual populations within polymicrobial biofilms
    Lopes, Susana Patricia
    Azevedo, Nuno Filipe
    Pereira, Maria Olivia
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2018, 8
  • [34] Quantitative assessment of individual populations within polymicrobial biofilms
    Susana Patrícia Lopes
    Nuno Filipe Azevedo
    Maria Olívia Pereira
    Scientific Reports, 8
  • [35] Determining the physiological status of individual bacterial cells
    Howard-Jones, MH
    Frischer, ME
    Verity, PG
    METHODS IN MICROBIOLOGY, VOL 30, 2001, 30 : 175 - 205
  • [36] MEASUREMENT OF DRUG ACTION ON POPULATIONS OF BACTERIAL CELLS
    COOPER, KE
    LINTON, AH
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1966, 45 (03): : R15 - &
  • [37] An individual-based approach to explain plasmid invasion in bacterial populations
    Seoane, Jose
    Yankelevich, Tatiana
    Dechesne, Arnaud
    Merkey, Brian
    Sternberg, Claus
    Smets, Barth F.
    FEMS MICROBIOLOGY ECOLOGY, 2011, 75 (01) : 17 - 27
  • [38] An Assessment of Bacterial Populations in a Static Windrow Compost Pile
    MacCready, Joshua S.
    Elbert, Nathan J.
    Quinn, Ann B.
    Potter, Beth A.
    COMPOST SCIENCE & UTILIZATION, 2013, 21 (02) : 110 - 120
  • [39] Observable Weight Distributions and Children's Individual Weight Assessment
    Brown, H. Shelton, III
    Evans, Alexandra E.
    Mirchandani, Gita G.
    Kelder, Steven H.
    Hoelscher, Deanna M.
    OBESITY, 2010, 18 (01) : 202 - 205
  • [40] Modelling the individual cell lag time distributions of Listeria monocytogenes as a function of the physiological state and the growth conditions
    Guillier, Laurent
    Augustin, Jean-Christophe
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD MICROBIOLOGY, 2006, 111 (03) : 241 - 251