Dose escalation in brachytherapy for cervical cancer: impact on (or increased need for) MRI-guided plan optimisation

被引:6
|
作者
Paton, A. M. [1 ]
Chalmers, K. E. [1 ]
Coomber, H. [1 ]
Cameron, A. L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Bristol NHS Fdn Trust, Bristol Haematol & Oncol Ctr, Radiotherapy Phys Unit, Bristol BS35 2YJ, Avon, England
[2] Univ Hosp Bristol NHS Fdn Trust, Bristol Haematol & Oncol Ctr, Dept Oncol, Bristol BS35 2YJ, Avon, England
来源
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY | 2012年 / 85卷 / 1020期
关键词
VOLUME PARAMETERS; UTERINE CERVIX; TUMOR SIZE; CARCINOMA; RADIOTHERAPY; RECOMMENDATIONS; IRRADIATION; TERMS;
D O I
10.1259/bjr/30377872
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of dose escalation on the proportion of patients requiring MR image-guided optimisation rather than standard Manchester-based CT-guided planning, and the level of escalation achievable. Methods: 30 patients with cervical cancer treated with external beam radiotherapy and image-guided brachytherapy (IGBT) had MR images acquired at the first fraction of IGBT. Gross tumour volume and high-risk clinical target volume (HR CTV) were contoured and treatment plans retrospectively produced for a range of total 2-Gy equivalent (EQD2) prescription doses from 66 Gy(alpha/beta=10) to 90 Gy(alpha/beta=10) (HR CTV D90). Standard Manchester system-style plans were produced, prescribed to point A and then optimised where necessary with the aim of delivering at least the prescription dose to the HR CTV D90 while respecting organ-at-risk (OAR) tolerances. Results: Increasing the total EQD2 from 66 Gy(alpha/beta=10) to 90 Gy(alpha/beta=10) increased the number of plans requiring optimisation from 13.3% to 90%. After optimisation, the number of plans achieving the prescription dose ranged from 93.3% (66 Gy(alpha/beta=10)) to 63.3% (90 Gy(alpha/beta=10)) with the mean +/- standard deviation for HR CTV D90 EQD2 from 78.4 +/- 12.4 Gy(alpha/beta=10) (66 Gy(alpha/beta=10)) to 94.1 +/- 19.9 Gy(alpha/beta=10) (90 Gy(alpha/beta=10)). Conclusion: As doses are escalated, the need for non-standard optimised planning increases, while benefits in terms of increased target doses actually achieved diminish. The maximum achievable target dose is ultimately limited by proximity of OARs. Advances in knowledge: This work represents a guide for other centres in determining the highest practicable prescription doses while considering patient throughput and maintaining acceptable OAR doses.
引用
收藏
页码:E1249 / E1255
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] MRI-guided focal or integrated boost high dose rate brachytherapy for recurrent prostate cancer
    Menard, Cynthia
    Navarro-Domenech, Inmaculada
    Liu, Zhihu
    Joseph, Lisa
    Barkati, Maroie
    Berlin, Alejandro
    Delouya, Guila
    Taussky, Daniel
    Beauchemin, Marie-Claude
    Nicolas, Benedicte
    Kadoury, Samuel
    Rink, Alexandra
    Raman, Srinivas
    Sundaramurthy, Aravindhan
    Weersink, Robert
    Beliveau-Nadeau, Dominic
    Helou, Joelle
    Chun, Peter
    NIKE
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [32] Dose differentiated high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy: a feasibility assessment of MRI-guided dose escalation to dominant intra-prostatic lesions
    Luminais, Christopher K.
    Nourzadeh, Hamidreza
    Aliotta, Eric
    Ward, Kristin
    Cousins, David
    Showalter, Timothy N.
    Libby, Bruce
    JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY BRACHYTHERAPY, 2022, 14 (05) : 423 - 428
  • [33] MRI-guided brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer: Program initiation, learning curve and dose delivery results in Kuopio University Hospital
    Jaaskelainen, Ester
    Karkkainen, Henna
    Palmgren, Jan-Erik
    Tolmunen, Tommi
    Kraav, Siiri-Liisi
    Anttila, Maarit
    BRACHYTHERAPY, 2021, 20 (04) : 738 - 747
  • [34] Preliminary Results of MRI-guided Brachytherapy in Cervical Carcinoma: The Chiangmai University Experience
    Tharavichitkul, Ekkasit
    Sivasomboon, Chate
    Wanwilairat, Somsak
    Lorvidhaya, Vicharn
    Sukthomya, Vimol
    Chakrabhandu, Somvilai
    Lookkaew, Sanchai
    Chitapanarux, Imjai
    Galalae, Razvan
    JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2012, 53 (02) : 313 - 318
  • [35] Treatment outcomes of MRI-guided adaptive brachytherapy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer: institutional experiences
    Radovan Vojtíšek
    Petr Hošek
    Emília Sukovská
    Petra Kovářová
    Jan Baxa
    Jiří Ferda
    Jindřich Fínek
    Strahlentherapie und Onkologie, 2022, 198 : 783 - 791
  • [36] Treatment outcomes of MRI-guided adaptive brachytherapy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer: institutional experiences
    Vojtisek, Radovan
    Hosek, Petr
    Sukovska, Emilia
    Kovarova, Petra
    Baxa, Jan
    Ferda, Jiri
    Finek, Jindrich
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2022, 198 (09) : 783 - 791
  • [37] INTRAOPERATIVE MRI-GUIDED BRACHYTHERAPY FOR CERVICAL CANCER: AN INSTITUTIONAL EXPERIENCE OF TREATMENT WORKFLOW, PLANNING AND PATIENT TOXICITY
    Leung, Eric
    D'Alimonte, Laura
    Barbera, Lisa
    Barnes, Elizabeth
    Taggar, Amandeep
    Donovan, Elysia
    Ravi, Ananth
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2020, 150 : S43 - S43
  • [38] Neural network-assisted automated image registration for MRI-guided adaptive brachytherapy in cervical cancer
    Ecker, Stefan
    Zimmermann, Lukas
    Heilemann, Gerd
    Niatsetski, Yury
    Schmid, Maximilian
    Sturdza, Alina Emiliana
    Knoth, Johannes
    Kirisits, Christian
    Nesvacil, Nicole
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR MEDIZINISCHE PHYSIK, 2022, 32 (04): : 488 - 499
  • [39] MRI-guided treatment of cervical cancer patients;: comparing brachytherapy with an IMRT-boost technique.
    Ketelaars, M
    van de Bunt, L
    de Kort, GAP
    Ceylan, C
    Jürgenliemk-Schulz, IM
    van der Heide, UA
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2005, 75 : S12 - S12
  • [40] Treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer in a patient with a bicornuate uterus with MRI-guided intracavitary/interstitial brachytherapy
    Fabian, Denise
    LaRocco, Allison
    Olsen, Meghan
    Quick, Allison
    JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY BRACHYTHERAPY, 2019, 11 (03) : 285 - 291