Comparison of Two Morphine-Benzodiazepine-Hydroxyzine Combinations for the Oral Sedation of Pediatric Dental Patients: A Retrospective Study

被引:0
|
作者
Chen, Norman [1 ]
Tanbonliong, Thomas [2 ]
机构
[1] USC, Ostrow Sch Dent, Adv Pediat Dent Program, Dept Publ Hlth & Pediat Dent, Los Angeles, CA USA
[2] USC, Ostrow Sch Dent, Adv Pediat Dent Program, Dept Publ Hlth & Pediat Dent,Clin Dent, Los Angeles, CA 90007 USA
关键词
MORPHINE SULFATE; MODERATE ORAL SEDATION; PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY; RECOMMENDED USE; CHILDREN; BEHAVIOR; RELEASE; PHARMACOKINETICS; TEMPERAMENT; MANAGEMENT; INFANTS; CARE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: To investigate the effectiveness of oral morphine sulfate regimens in sedating pediatric dental patients and assess whether pre-sedation disposition and willingness to take the sedative were related to the outcome of the sedation. Methods: The sedation records of 271 pediatric dental patients sedated with oral morphine were reviewed. Children were either sedated with regimen one (morphine plus midazolam plus hydroxyzine) or regimen two (morphine plus diazepam plus hydroxyzine). Data gathered included the patient's pre-sedation disposition, willingness to take the sedative, effectiveness of sedation, and occurrence of any adverse event. Data analysis was conducted using descriptive statistics, Pearson's chi-square, and logistic regression. Results: Regimens one and two had an overall success rate of 80 percent (143 out of 178) and 81 percent (75 out of 93), respectively. A positive correlation was observed between the patient's willingness to take his/her sedative medication and the effectiveness of the sedation using both the Pearson's chi-square (P=.004) and logistic regression (P=.028). Adverse events occurred in six percent (17 out of 271) of the cases. Conclusions: Overall rate of effective sedation using various oral morphine sulfate regimens was above 80 percent. Minimal adverse events occurred. The patient's willingness to take the sedative was positively associated with the outcome of the sedation regimen.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 48
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A comparison of two different fluid resuscitation management protocols for pediatric burn patients: A retrospective study
    Huang, Miao
    Chen, Jun-Feng
    Chen, Li-ying
    Pan, Li-qin
    Li, Xiao-jian
    Ye, Jie-yu
    Tan, Hui-yi
    BURNS, 2018, 44 (01) : 82 - 89
  • [32] Comparison the sedation effect and satisfaction of two combinations, dexmedetomidine and fentanyl with midazolam and fentanyl, in patients undergoing bronchoscopy
    Karnali, Alireza
    Sarkhosh, Sepideh
    Kazemizadeh, Hosein
    JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2020, 6 (06): : 296 - 299
  • [33] Cross-sectional study of propofol dose during intravenous sedation for dental surgery in patients with long-term oral benzodiazepine therapy: A secondary publication
    Fujisawa, Toshiaki
    Miyata, Kazuki
    Nitta, Yukie
    Terui, Akifumi
    Ishikawa, Emi
    Hamaya, Eri
    Wakana, Keiichiro
    Takuma, Shigeru
    Shibuya, Makiko
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL DENTAL RESEARCH, 2022, 8 (05): : 1124 - 1129
  • [34] A Retrospective Comparison of Dexmedetomidine Versus Midazolam for Pediatric Patients with Congenital Heart Disease Requiring Postoperative Sedation
    Jiang, Li
    Ding, Sheng
    Yan, Hongtao
    Li, Yunming
    Zhang, Liping
    Chen, Xue
    Yin, Xiumei
    Liu, Shunbi
    Tang, Xiuying
    Zhang, Jinbao
    PEDIATRIC CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 36 (05) : 993 - 999
  • [35] A retrospective comparison of propofol to dexmedetomidine for pediatric magnetic resonance imaging sedation in patients with mucopolysaccharidosis type II
    Kang, RyungA
    Shin, Young Hee
    Gil, Nam-Su
    Oh, Ye Na
    Hahm, Tae Soo
    Jeong, Ji Seon
    PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2018, 28 (12) : 1116 - 1122
  • [36] A Retrospective Comparison of Dexmedetomidine Versus Midazolam for Pediatric Patients with Congenital Heart Disease Requiring Postoperative Sedation
    Li Jiang
    Sheng Ding
    Hongtao Yan
    Yunming Li
    Liping Zhang
    Xue Chen
    Xiumei Yin
    Shunbi Liu
    Xiuying Tang
    Jinbao Zhang
    Pediatric Cardiology, 2015, 36 : 993 - 999
  • [37] Post-Discharge Effects and Parents' Opinions of Intranasal Fentanyl with Oral Midazolam Sedation in Pediatric Dental Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Alhaidari, Roaa I.
    AlSarheed, Maha A.
    CHILDREN-BASEL, 2022, 9 (02):
  • [38] Two Oral Midazolam Preparations in Pediatric Dental Patients: A Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial
    Salem, Katayoun
    Kamranzadeh, Shaqayegh
    Kousha, Maryam
    Shaeghi, Shahnaz
    AbdollahGorgi, Fatemeh
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2015, 2015
  • [39] COMPARISON OF NITROUS OXIDE SEDATION VERSUS ORAL SEDATION IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING REZUM PROSTATE ABLATION: A FEASIBILITY STUDY
    Gopalakrishna, A.
    Bole, R.
    Parikh, N.
    Ahmed, M.
    Pagel, E.
    Book, J.
    Yang, D.
    Jimbo, M.
    Ziegelmann, M.
    Lomas, D.
    Kohler, T.
    JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2021, 18 (03): : S61 - S61
  • [40] Comparison of Oral and Buccal Midazolam for Pediatric Dental Sedation: A Randomized, Cross-Over, Clinical Trial for Efficacy, Acceptance and Safety
    Tavassoli-Hojjati, Sara
    Mehran, Majid
    Haghgoo, Roza
    Tohid-Rahbari, Monireh
    Ahmadi, Rahil
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2014, 24 (02) : 198 - 206