Is UK biofuel supply from Miscanthus water-limited?

被引:82
|
作者
Richter, G. M. [1 ]
Riche, A. B. [1 ]
Dailey, A. G. [1 ]
Gezan, S. A. [1 ]
Powlson, D. S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Bioenergy & Climate Change, Harpenden AL5 2JQ, Herts, England
关键词
available water capacity; biomass crops; Miscanthus x giganteus; weather variability; soil map;
D O I
10.1111/j.1475-2743.2008.00156.x
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
Sustainable Miscanthus plantings encouraged under publicly funded schemes should be based oil sound economic and environmental assessments. We developed in empirical yield model for Miscanthus from harvestable dry matter yields at 14 field trials in the UK to estimate site-specific and regional yields derived front meteorological variables and soil available Water. Harvestable yields of crops established for at least 3 years at 14 arable sites across the UK ranged from 5 to 18 t/ha, averaging at 12.8 (+/- 2.9) t/ha. Variables considered to affect yield were number of years after plantings length of season (T-air > 9 degrees C), temperature. global solar radiation, precipitation and potential evapotranspiration during the season, and soil available water capacity (AWC). At a single site (Rothamsted), AWC and the relative average potential soil moisture deficit during the main growing season explained 70% of annual yield variation (RMSE = 1.38 t/ha, P < 0.001). F or the complete UK data set (n = 67) yield variation was related to A WC, air temperature and precipitation (RMSE = 2.1 t/ha, P < 0.01). Linking soil Survey and spatially interpolated weather data we calculated an overall national average dry matter yield of 9.6 t/ha. As shown for two counties (Oxfordshire and North Yorkshire), estimated yield may decrease by 1 t/ha, and its uncertainty may rise from 15 to > 20%, when soil survey instead of local soil data are used. Using data from a single weather station can introduce a bias (< I t/ha) because of differences in elevation and local temperature and precipitation. Overall. it seems most important for bioenergy plantings to assure Sufficient Water supply from the soil (AWC > 150 mm) during the main growing season.
引用
收藏
页码:235 / 245
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Optimal root profiles in water-limited ecosystems
    Rudd, Keith
    Albertson, John D.
    Ferrari, Silvia
    ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES, 2014, 71 : 16 - 22
  • [22] Effects Of Thinning In a Water-Limited Holm Oak Forest
    Ogaya, Roma
    Escola, Anna
    Liu, Daijun
    Barbeta, Adria
    Penuelas, Josep
    JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY, 2020, 39 (04) : 365 - 378
  • [23] Jarosite as an indicator of water-limited chemical weathering on Mars
    M. E. Elwood Madden
    R. J. Bodnar
    J. D. Rimstidt
    Nature, 2004, 431 : 821 - 823
  • [24] Highlights of special issue on ‘Agriculture in Water-Limited Areas'
    Pute WU
    FrontiersofAgriculturalScienceandEngineering, 2017, 4 (02) : 123 - 125
  • [25] Amyloid Fibrillation of Insulin under Water-Limited Conditions
    Choi, Tae Su
    Lee, Jong Wha
    Jin, Kyeong Sik
    Kim, Hugh I.
    BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 107 (08) : 1939 - 1949
  • [26] Jarosite as an indicator of water-limited chemical weathering on Mars
    Madden, MEE
    Bodnar, RJ
    Rimstidt, JD
    NATURE, 2004, 431 (7010) : 821 - 823
  • [27] Adaptation of grain legumes (pulses) to water-limited environments
    Turner, NC
    Wright, GC
    Siddique, KHH
    ADVANCES IN AGRONOMY, VOL 71, 2001, 71 : 193 - 231
  • [28] Crop water use efficiency from eddy covariance methods in cold water-limited regions
    Harder, Phillip
    Helgason, Warren D.
    Johnson, Bruce
    Pomeroy, John W.
    AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2023, 341
  • [29] The ecohydrological role of soil texture in a water-limited ecosystem
    Fernandez-Illescas, CP
    Porporato, A
    Laio, F
    Rodriguez-Iturbe, I
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2001, 37 (12) : 2863 - 2872
  • [30] Sugarcane for water-limited environments: Enhanced capability of the APSIM sugarcane model for assessing traits for transpiration efficiency and root water supply
    Inman-Bamber, N. G.
    Jackson, P. A.
    Stokes, C. J.
    Verrall, S.
    Lakshmanan, P.
    Basnayake, J.
    FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2016, 196 : 112 - 123