A 30 year perspective of the quality of evidence published in 25 clinical journals: Signs of change?

被引:12
|
作者
Gnanalingham, M. G.
Robinson, S. G.
Hawley, D. P.
Gnanalingham, K. K.
机构
[1] Hope Hosp, Greater Manchester Neurosci Ctr, Dept Neurosurg, Salford M6 8HD, Lancs, England
[2] Queens Med Ctr, Dept Paediat, Nottingham NG7 2UH, England
关键词
D O I
10.1136/pgmj.2005.041251
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Methods: The quality of clinical studies published in five different specialties, over three decades was evaluated. Computerised search of the Medline database was undertaken to evaluate the articles published in 25 clinical journals in 1983, 1993, and 2003 from five different specialties ( medicine, surgery, paediatrics, anaesthesia, and psychiatry). The number of randomised controlled trials (RCTs), meta-analyses, and other clinical trials (non-RCT) were noted. Results: From the 27 030 articles evaluated, there were 2283 (8.4%) RCTs, 166 ( 0.6%) meta-analyses, and 4153 ( 15.4%) other clinical trials. For the proportion of RCTs, the rank order of the specialties was; anaesthesia ( 503; 18%), psychiatry ( 294; 9.6%), medicine ( 899; 8.1%), paediatrics ( 326; 6.4%), and surgery ( 261; 5.3%) ( p< 0.001). For the proportion of meta-analysis, the rank order of the specialties was; psychiatry ( 36; 1.2%), medicine ( 105; 0.9%), paediatrics ( 15; 0.3%), anaesthesia ( 6; 0.2%), and surgery ( 4; 0.1%) ( p< 0.001). Overall, from 1983 to 2003, there were increases in the proportion of RCTs ( 449, 5.9% to 1027, 9.6%), meta-analysis ( 0, 0% to 127, 1.2%), and other clinical trials ( 897, 12% to 1983, 19%) ( p< 0.001). This trend was apparent in each clinical specialty ( p< 0.001). Conclusions: Over the three decades evaluated, clinical trials, notably RCTs and meta-analysis form only a small proportion of articles published in prominent journals from five clinical specialties. This is notwithstanding the modest increases in the proportions of RCTs and meta-analysis over the same period.
引用
收藏
页码:397 / 399
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Five-year change in statistical designs of phase II trials published in leading cancer journals
    Thezenas, S
    Duffour, J
    Culine, S
    Kramar, A
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2004, 40 (08) : 1244 - 1249
  • [22] Quality Assessment of Published Systematic Reviews in High Impact Cardiology Journals: Revisiting the Evidence Pyramid
    Abushouk, Abdelrahman I.
    Yunusa, Ismaeel
    Elmehrath, Ahmed O.
    Elmatboly, Abdelmagid M.
    Fayek, Shady Hany
    Abdelfattah, Omar M.
    Saad, Anas
    Isogai, Toshiaki
    Shekhar, Shashank
    Kalra, Ankur
    Reed, Grant W.
    Puri, Rishi
    Kapadia, Samir
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2021, 8
  • [23] Quality of reporting and risk of bias of randomized clinical trials published in Spanish and Latin American journals
    Bachelet, Vivienne C.
    Pardo-Hernandez, Hector
    MEDWAVE, 2019, 19 (01):
  • [24] The Citation Life Cycle of Articles Published in 13 American Psychological Association Journals: A 25-Year Longitudinal Analysis
    Walters, Glenn D.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 62 (08): : 1629 - 1636
  • [25] The quality of evidence on nutrition intervention published in Chinese journals: an assessment of meta-analyses on vitamin interventions
    Ning, Yanhua
    Zhang, Juxia
    Li, Yun
    ASIA PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2018, 27 (04) : 925 - 934
  • [26] Quality of Clinical Studies in Aesthetic Surgery Journals: A 10-Year Review
    Chang, Edwin Y.
    Pannucci, Christopher J.
    Wilkins, Edwin G.
    AESTHETIC SURGERY JOURNAL, 2009, 29 (02) : 144 - 147
  • [27] Analysis of the Quality of Clinical Trials Published in Spanish-Language Dermatology Journals Between 1997 and 2012
    Sanclemente, G.
    Pardo, H.
    Sanchez, S.
    Bonfill, X.
    ACTAS DERMO-SIFILIOGRAFICAS, 2016, 107 (01): : 44 - 54
  • [28] QUALITY OF CLINICAL-TRIALS PUBLISHED IN SPAIN - ANALYSIS OF 3 MEDICAL JOURNALS FROM 1985 TO 1991
    SOTO, J
    GALENDE, I
    SACRISTAN, JA
    MEDICINA CLINICA, 1994, 102 (07): : 241 - 245
  • [29] Do orthopaedic journals provide high-quality evidence for clinical practice?
    E. Kıter
    V. Karatosun
    I. Günal
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2003, 123 : 82 - 85
  • [30] Do orthopaedic journals provide high-quality evidence for clinical practice?
    Kiter, E
    Karatosun, V
    Günal, I
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2003, 123 (2-3) : 82 - 85