ON THE USE OF HONESTY PRIMING TASKS TO MITIGATE HYPOTHETICAL BIAS IN CHOICE EXPERIMENTS

被引：100

作者：

de-Magistris, Tiziana ^{[1
]}

Gracia, Azucena ^{[1
]}

Nayga, Rodolfo M., Jr. ^{[2
,3
]}

机构：

[1] Ctr Invest & Tecnol Agroalimentaria Aragon CITA, Unidad Econ Agroalimentaria & Recursos Nat, Zaragoza, Spain

[2] Univ Arkansas, Dept Agr Econ & Agribusiness, Div Agr, Fayetteville, AR 72701 USA

[3] Korea Univ, Dept Food & Resource Econ, Seoul, South Korea

来源：

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS | 2013年 / 95卷 / 05期

关键词：

honesty priming; hypothetical bias; willingness to pay; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; CHEAP TALK; ELICITATION; VALUATION; ELIMINATE; CONSUMERS; LOGIT;

D O I：

10.1093/ajae/aat052

中图分类号：

F3 [农业经济];

学科分类号：

0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;

摘要：

We test whether the use of an honesty priming task can help mitigate hypothetical bias in stated preference choice experiments (CE). Using a between-sample design, we conducted hypothetical and non-hypothetical choice experiments with seven treatments. Our results suggest that marginal willingness to pay estimates from hypothetical CE with an honesty priming task are not significantly different from marginal valuations from non-hypothetical CE. Values from both of these treatments are lower than those from three other hypothetical treatments, while values from the three non-hypothetical treatments are not significantly different from each other.

引用

页码：1136 / 1154

页数：19

共 50 条

[21] Choke Price Bias in Choice Experiments
Morkbak, Morten Raun
Christensen, Tove
Gyrd-Hansen, Dorte
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2010, 45 (04): : 537 - 551
[22] Choke Price Bias in Choice Experiments
Morten Raun Mørkbak
Tove Christensen
Dorte Gyrd-Hansen
Environmental and Resource Economics, 2010, 45 : 537 - 551
[23] Priming honesty reduces subjective bias in self-report measures of mind wandering
Vinski, Melaina T.
Watter, Scott
CONSCIOUSNESS AND COGNITION, 2012, 21 (01) : 451 - 455
[24] Do We Say What We Do? Testing Cheap Talk to Reduce Hypothetical Bias in Moral Choice Experiments
Smeele, Nicholas V. R.
van Cranenburgh, Sandra
Donkers, Bas
Schermer, Maartje H. N.
de Bekker-Grob, Esther W.
PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2024, 17 (06): : 720 - 721
[25] SOCIAL DESIRABILITY BIAS IN REAL, HYPOTHETICAL, AND INFERRED VALUATION EXPERIMENTS
Norwood, F. Bailey
Lusk, Jayson L.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2011, 93 (02) : 528 - 534
[26] Empirical Analysis of Hypothetical Bias in Stated-Preference Experiments
Tang, Li
Luo, Xia
GREEN INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, 2018, 419 : 447 - 463
[27] Dynamic hypothetical bias in discrete choice experiments: Evidence from measuring the impact of corporate social responsibility on consumers demand
Arana, Jorge E.
Leon, Carmelo J.
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2013, 87 : 53 - 61
[28] SEPARATION OF BIAS AND SENSITIVITY IN MULTIPLE-CHOICE TASKS
INGLEBY, JD
PERCEPTION, 1973, 2 (03) : 295 - 305
[29] Mitigating hypothetical bias by defaulting to opt-out in an online choice
Penn, Jerrod
Hu, Wuyang
APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2021, 53 (03) : 315 - 328
[30] The Sensitivity and Specificity of Repeated and Dominant Choice Tasks in Discrete Choice Experiments
Jonker, Marcel F.
Roudijk, Bram
Maas, Merit
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2022, 25 (08) : 1381 - 1389

← 1 2 3 4 5 →