Objective paper structure comparison: Assessing comparison algorithms

被引：6
|
作者：
Berger, Charles E. H. [1 ,2 ]
Ramos, Daniel [3 ,4 ]
机构：
[1] Netherlands Forens Inst, NL-2490 AA The Hague, Netherlands
[2] Leiden Univ, NL-2300 RA Leiden, Netherlands
[3] Univ Autonoma Madrid, ATVS Biometr Recognit Grp, E-28049 Madrid, Spain
[4] Univ Autonoma Madrid, Res Inst Forens Sci & Secur ICFS, E-28049 Madrid, Spain
来源：
FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL | 2012年 / 222卷 / 1-3期
关键词：
Forensic science; Questioned documents; Paper structure; Fourier analysis; Information theoretical analysis; Empirical Cross-Entropy;
D O I：
10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.07.018
中图分类号：
DF [法律]; D9 [法律]; R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号：
0301 ; 10 ;
摘要：
More than just being a substrate, paper can also provide evidence for the provenance of documents. An earlier paper described a method to compare paper structure, based on the Fourier power spectra of light transmission images. Good results were obtained by using the 2D correlation of images derived from the power spectra as a similarity score, but the method was very computationally intensive. Different comparison algorithms are evaluated in this paper, using information theoretical criteria. An angular invariant algorithm turned out to be as effective as the original one but 4 orders of magnitude faster, making the use of much larger databases possible. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：360 / 367
页数：8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Assessing distance measures for protein structure comparison
    Wu, Zikai
    Wang, Yong
    Feng, Enmin
    Chen, Luonan
    OPTIMIZATION AND SYSTEMS BIOLOGY, 2007, 7 : 324 - +
  • [22] Comparison of multiple objective genetic algorithms for parallel machine scheduling problems
    Carlyle, WM
    Kim, B
    Fowler, JW
    Gel, ES
    EVOLUTIONARY MULTI-CRITERION OPTIMIZATION, PROCEEDINGS, 2001, 1993 : 472 - 485
  • [23] Quantitative Analysis and Objective Comparison of Clustering Algorithms for Medical Image Segmentation
    Krestanova, Alice
    Kubicek, Jan
    Skandera, Jiri
    Vilimek, Dominik
    Oczka, David
    Penhaker, Marek
    Augustynek, Martin
    Cerny, Martin
    INTELLIGENT INFORMATION AND DATABASE SYSTEMS (ACIIDS 2020), PT II, 2020, 12034 : 114 - 125
  • [24] Objective Models for Performance Comparison of Compression Algorithms for 3DTV
    Kufa, Jan
    Kaller, Ondrej
    Zach, Ondrej
    Polak, Ladislav
    Kratochvil, Tomas
    RADIOENGINEERING, 2019, 28 (01) : 207 - 219
  • [25] On the Integrity of Performance Comparison for Evolutionary Multi-objective Optimisation Algorithms
    Wilson, Kevin
    Rostami, Shahin
    ADVANCES IN COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS (UKCI), 2019, 840 : 3 - 15
  • [26] Deep Statistical Comparison for Multi-Objective Stochastic Optimization Algorithms
    Eftimov, Tome
    Korosec, Peter
    SWARM AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2021, 61
  • [27] Comparison and Evaluation of Multiple Objective Genetic Algorithms for the Antenna Placement Problem
    Larry Raisanen
    Roger M. Whitaker
    Mobile Networks and Applications, 2005, 10 : 79 - 88
  • [28] Comparison and evaluation of multiple objective genetic algorithms for the antenna placement problem
    Raisanen, L
    Whitaker, RM
    MOBILE NETWORKS & APPLICATIONS, 2005, 10 (1-2): : 79 - 88
  • [29] Comparison of Three Multi-objective Optimization Algorithms for Hydrological Model
    Huang, Xiaomin
    Lei, Xiaohui
    Jiang, Yunzhong
    COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2012, 316 : 209 - +
  • [30] A Comparison of Multiple Objective Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving the Multi-Objective Node Placement Problem
    Masri, Hela
    Abdelkhalek, Ons
    Krichen, Saoussen
    2014 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONTROL, DECISION AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES (CODIT), 2014, : 152 - 157
12345