Carotid body tumor contemporary management in a high-volume center

被引:6
|
作者
Mascia, Daniele [1 ]
Esposito, Gloria [1 ]
Ferrante, Angela [2 ]
Grandi, Alessandro [1 ]
Melissano, Germano [1 ]
Chiesa, Roberto [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vita Salute San Raffaele, San Raffaele Hosp, IRCCS, Unit Vasc Surg, Via Olgettina 60, I-20132 Milan, Italy
[2] Sacred Heart Catholic Univ, A Gemelli Univ Polyclin, Unit Vasc Surg, Rome, Italy
来源
JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY | 2020年 / 61卷 / 04期
关键词
Carotid body tumor; Paraganglioma; Surgical procedures; operative; Cranial nerve injuries; PREOPERATIVE EMBOLIZATION; CLASSIFICATION; ARTERY; PARAGANGLIOMAS; HEAD;
D O I
10.23736/S0021-9509.19.10496-X
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to report our results with carotid body tumor (CBT) surgical management. METHODS: Between 2010 and 2018, 100 CBTs (mean age: 48.0 years, range 21-80 years old) were treated in our center. The patients were classified in 3 groups according to the size: group I (<3 cm), group II (3 to 5 cm) and group III (>5 cm). RESULTS: Surgical resection was performed in 88 patients and conservative treatment in 2 cases. Nine patients were treated for bilateral involvement and one of them was also treated again for a relapse. Postoperatively, cranial nerve injury (CNI) was significantly higher in group II [3 (8.3%) vs. 16 (31.4%) vs. 2 (15.4%); P=0.030] with no statistical differences between the CN involved. At univariate analysis for CNI, CBT group (P=0.030), maximum diameter (P=0.046), patients presenting with dysphonia (P=0.035) and dysphagia (P=0.007) and patients suffering from any intraoperative complication (P=0.047) were statistically significant. At multivariate analysis the only significant variable was CBT group II (P=0.016). For blood loss, CBT group III (P<0.001), Shamblin class III (P<0.001), Pulmonary disease (P=0.034) and surgery time (P<0.001) were statistically significant. The follow-up of 79 patients (87.8%) showed a 100% overall survival at median follow-up of 37.7 months (range 2-84.7 months) with freedom from local recurrence of 97.8% (77/79); CONCLUSIONS: Surgical resection remains the gold standard to obtain complete recovery, although tumor size is to be considered a risk factor for CNI because large CBTs remain at high risk for CNIs.
引用
收藏
页码:459 / 466
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Modeling Patient Access to High-Volume Surgeons for Carotid Endarterectomy
    Soh, Ina
    Tarsa, Stephen J.
    Breite, Matthew
    Sheaffer, William
    Davila, Victor
    Stone, William
    Money, Samuel
    Meltzer, Andrew
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2020, 72 (01) : E11 - E12
  • [32] Surgical treatment of pNET - Experience of a "high-volume" center
    Boesch, Florian
    Hofmann, Katharina
    Coenen, Michaela
    Pratschke, Sebastian
    Thomas, Michael
    Knoesel, Thomas
    Bruns, Christiane J.
    Guba, Markus
    Werner, Jens
    Angele, Martin K.
    SURGICAL ONCOLOGY-OXFORD, 2018, 27 (03): : 409 - 414
  • [33] Clinical risk management in high-volume cataract surgery; [Klinisches Risikomanagement bei High-Volume Kataraktchirurgie]
    Reinelt P.
    Härting H.
    Lübke B.
    Jirak P.
    Schönherr U.
    Spektrum der Augenheilkunde, 2011, 25 (6) : 372 - 376
  • [34] Short and Long-term Outcomes Among High-Volume vs Low-Volume Esophagectomy Surgeons at a High-Volume Center
    Dolan, Daniel
    White, Abby
    Lee, Daniel N.
    Mazzola, Emanuele
    Polhemus, Emily
    Kucukak, Suden
    Wee, Jon O.
    Swanson, Scott J.
    SEMINARS IN THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2022, 34 (04) : 1340 - 1350
  • [35] Infantile Tachyarrhythmia: Management Strategy and Short-Term Results in a High-Volume Referral Center
    Dalili, Mohammad
    Ajri-Khamesloo, Faramarz
    Madadi, Shabnam
    Arabi-Moghaddam, Mohammad Yusef
    IRANIAN HEART JOURNAL, 2020, 21 (03): : 137 - 144
  • [36] Aggressive Surgical Management of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis With Low Mortality in a High-Volume Tertiary Cancer Center
    Niraj J. Gusani
    Sung W. Cho
    Christos Colovos
    Songwon Seo
    Jan Franko
    Scott D. Richard
    Robert P. Edwards
    Charles K. Brown
    Matthew P. Holtzman
    Herbert J. Zeh
    David L. Bartlett
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2008, 15 : 754 - 763
  • [37] Inpatient Management of Pulmonary Embolism: Clinical Characteristics and Mortality in a High-Volume Tertiary Care Center
    Mudrakola, Harsha, V
    Caples, Sean M.
    Hyde, Robert J.
    Ii, Robert D. McBane
    Ahmad, Sumera R.
    JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND THROMBOLYSIS, 2022, 54 (01) : 145 - 152
  • [38] Conservative management of grade 4 and 5 renal injuries: A high-volume trauma center experience
    Glykas, Ioannis
    Fragkoulis, Charalampos
    Paizis, Theodoros
    Papadopoulos, Georgios
    Stathouros, Georgios
    Ntoumas, Konstantinos
    UROLOGIA JOURNAL, 2021, 88 (04) : 287 - 291
  • [39] Life cycle management of Micra transcatheter pacing system: Data from a high-volume center
    Bhatia, Neal K.
    Kiani, Soroosh
    Merchant, Faisal M.
    Delurgio, David B.
    Patel, Anshul M.
    Leon, Angel R.
    Lloyd, Michael S.
    Westerman, Stacy B.
    Shah, Anand D.
    El-Chami, Mikhael F.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2021, 32 (02) : 484 - 490
  • [40] Management of gunshot wounds near the elbow: experiences at a high-volume level I trauma center
    Ghilzai, Umar
    Ghali, Abdullah
    Singh, Aaron
    Mitchell, Thomas Wesley
    Mitchell, Scott A.
    CLINICS IN SHOULDER AND ELBOW, 2024, 27 (01): : 3 - 10