Understanding wettability in solid-liquid-liquid (SLL or immersed) systems is important for numerous applications. However, predicting SLL wetting behavior on smooth surfaces has received little attention. The objective of this work was to explore alternatives to predict SLL wettability. To this end, we first present a review of solid surface free energy (sigma(s)) data obtained from solid-liquid-air (SLA) contact angle (theta(alpha)(L)) data and a summary of available SLL contact angle data for selected materials. Next, the existing surface free energy models for SLA systems are discussed in terms of their applicability to predict wettability of SLL systems. Finally, the SLL wettability of toluene drops on glass, mica, stainless steel and PTFE immersed in equilibrated Toluene-water-isopropyl alcohol (IPA) solutions was determined via contact angle (theta(o)) measurements through the oil phase using the inverted sessile drop method over a wide range of interfacial tensions (gamma(o-aq)). The results were plotted as gamma(o-aq) .cos theta(o) vs. gamma(o-aq), showing a smooth wetting transition from water-wetting to oil-wetting with decreasing gamma(o-aq) for glass and stainless steel. Mica remained water-wetting, while PTFE oil-wetting. The Geometric (GM) and Harmonic (HM) mean approaches, and the Equation-of-State (EQS), originally developed for SLA systems, were extended to SLL systems. The extended GM and HM approaches could fit the SLL behavior after fitting the dispersive and polar contributions of the solid surface free energy (sigma(d)(S), sigma(D)(S)), which required additional SLA et measurements using PTFE as the reference surface. However, attempts at predicting theta(o) for systems with high gamma(o-aq), resulted in significant deviations, a problem linked to the high sigma(d)(S) values required to fit the wettability of low gamma(o-qa), systems (toluene-water-IPA). The extended EQS (e-EQS) method produced reasonable predictions of gamma(o-aq) .cos theta(o) for all the available experimental and literature data. The e-EQS method required fitting one of the interfacial energy terms (gamma(S-L)). For low surface energy materials, such as PTFE, the gamma(S-o) value should be fitted. For high surface energy materials, the gamma(S-aq) should be fitted instead. The fitted values of gamma(S-o) for PTFE and gamma(S-aq) for glass were consistent with the values obtained from Young's equation applied to SLA data. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.