Positron-Emission Tomography Scan-Directed Chemoradiation for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: No Benefit for a Change in Chemotherapy in Positron-Emission Tomography Nonresponders

被引:14
|
作者
Greally, Megan [1 ]
Chou, Joanne F. [2 ]
Molena, Daniela [3 ]
Rusch, Valerie W. [3 ]
Bains, Manjit S. [3 ]
Park, Bernard J. [3 ]
Wu, Abraham J. [4 ]
Goodman, Karyn A. [5 ]
Kelsen, David P. [1 ]
Janjigian, Yelena Y. [1 ]
Ilson, David H. [1 ]
Ku, Geoffrey Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Med, Gastrointestinal Oncol Serv, 300 E 66th St,Rm 1405, New York, NY 10065 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Epidemiol & Biostat, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021 USA
[3] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, Thorac Surg Serv, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021 USA
[4] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021 USA
[5] Univ Colorado, Dept Radiat Oncol, Anschutz Med Campus, Aurora, CO USA
关键词
Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; Positron-emission tomography; Induction chemotherapy; Positron-emission tomography nonresponders; Chemoradiation; LOCALLY ADVANCED ESOPHAGEAL; ESOPHAGOGASTRIC JUNCTION; PET; SURGERY; CANCER; CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; ADENOCARCINOMA; THERAPY; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jtho.2018.10.152
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction: Preoperative or definitive chemoradiation is an accepted treatment for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The MUNICON study showed that positron-emission tomography (PET) response following induction chemotherapy was predictive of outcomes in patients with gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. We evaluated the predictive value of PET following induction chemotherapy in ESCC patients and assessed the impact of changing chemotherapy during radiation in PET nonresponders. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all patients with locally advanced ESCC who received induction chemotherapy and chemoradiation; all patients had a PET before and after induction chemotherapy. Survival was calculated from date of repeat PET using Kaplan-Meier analysis and compared between groups using the log-rank test. Results: Of 111 patients, 70 (63%) were PET responders (defined as a 35% or more decrease in maximum standard uptake value) to induction chemotherapy. PET responders received the same chemotherapy during radiation. Of 41 PET nonresponders, 16 continued with the same chemotherapy and 25 were changed to alternative chemotherapy with radiation. Median progression-free survival (70.1 months versus 7.1 months, p < 0.01) and overall survival (84.8 months versus 17.2 months, p< 0.01) were improved for PET responders versus nonresponders. Median progression-free survival and overall survival for PET nonresponders who changed chemotherapy versus those who did not were 6.4 months versus 8.3 months (p = 0.556) and 14.1 versus 17.2 months (p = 0.81), respectively. Conclusions: PET after induction chemotherapy highly predicts for outcomes in ESCC patients who receive chemoradiation. However, our results suggest that PET nonresponders do not benefit from changing chemotherapy during radiation. Future trials should use PET nonresponse after induction chemotherapy to identify poor prognosis patients for novel therapies. (C) 2018 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:540 / 546
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY AND PERSONALITY-DISORDERS
    GOYER, PF
    COHEN, RM
    ANDREASON, PJ
    SEMPLE, WE
    CLAYTON, AH
    KING, AC
    COMPTONTOTH, BA
    SCHULZ, SC
    NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1994, 10 (01) : 21 - 28
  • [22] Overview of economic evaluation of positron-emission tomography
    Müller A.
    Stratmann-Schöne D.
    Klose T.
    Leidl R.
    The European Journal of Health Economics, 2002, 3 (1) : 59 - 65
  • [23] A positron-emission tomography (PET) study of akathisia
    Saklad, AR
    Miller, AL
    Olsen, JG
    Mayberg, H
    Fox, PT
    Zamarippa, F
    SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH, 1999, 36 (1-3) : 357 - 357
  • [24] Production of Radionuclides for Cyclotron Positron-Emission Tomography
    V. N. Pashentsev
    Atomic Energy, 2015, 118 : 405 - 409
  • [25] POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY Fast fixation of fluorine
    Johnson, Russell
    NATURE CHEMISTRY, 2021, 13 (04) : 303 - 303
  • [26] Temporal patterns of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma recurrence with positron-emission tomography/computed tomography monitoring
    Beswick, Daniel M.
    Gooding, William E.
    Johnson, Jonas T.
    Branstetter, Barton F.
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2012, 122 (07): : 1512 - 1517
  • [27] Tumor volume delineation: A pilot study comparing a digital positron-emission tomography prototype with an analog positron-emission tomography system
    Nguyen, Nghi C.
    Vercher-Conejero, Jose
    Faulhaber, Peter
    WORLD JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2019, 18 (01) : 45 - 51
  • [28] Role of Positron-Emission Tomography Scan in the Diagnosis and Management of Breast Cancer
    Almubarak, Mohammed
    Osman, Salman
    Marano, Gary
    Abraham, Jame
    ONCOLOGY-NEW YORK, 2009, 23 (03): : 255 - 261
  • [29] Preoperative dual-energy computed tomography and positron-emission tomography evaluation of lymph node metastasis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
    Sun, Xuyang
    Niwa, Tetsu
    Kazama, Toshiki
    Okazaki, Takashi
    Koyanagi, Kazuo
    Kumaki, Nobue
    Hashimoto, Jun
    Ozawa, Soji
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (09):
  • [30] Evaluation of fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography with computed tomography for staging of urothelial carcinoma
    Lodde, Michele
    Lacombe, Louis
    Friede, Juan
    Morin, Francis
    Saourine, Alexandre
    Fradet, Yves
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 106 (05) : 658 - 663