Evaluation of the dynamic energy performance gap of green buildings: Case studies in China

被引:21
|
作者
Wang, Dan [1 ,2 ]
Pang, Xiufeng [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Wei [1 ,2 ]
Qi, Zewei [1 ,2 ]
Ji, Ying [1 ,2 ]
Yin, Rongxin [3 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Univ Technol, Dept Bldg Environm & Facil Engn, Coll Architecture & Civil Engn, Beijing 100124, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Key Lab Green Built Environm & Energy Eff, Beijing 100124, Peoples R China
[3] Lawrence Berkeley Natl Lab, 1 Cyclotron Rd,MS 90R3111, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
green buildings; dynamic performance gap; energy use in buildings; case studies;
D O I
10.1007/s12273-020-0653-y
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
The green building concept originated from the need and desire for more energy efficient and environmentally friendly construction practices. With a boom in certified green buildings in recent decades, however, various stakeholders have raised concerns about the actual energy performance of such buildings. While studies have shown significant gaps between the expected and actual energy use of green buildings, the methods used in the analyses have been considered inappropriate. A dynamic approach has been suggested to quantify the discrepancy between the expected and actual energy use in green buildings. However, although the concept of the dynamic approach has been discussed in several studies, a process and methods for applying the approach in real applications are not available in the literature. This study introduces a process and methods for practicing the dynamic approach and provides five case studies of using this approach to assess the energy performance gap of green buildings. The analyses show that the dynamic performance gap of the five buildings ranges from 3.0% to 53.5%, with a median of 24.7%, and the average dynamic gap of the HVAC system is nearly two orders of magnitude greater than that of the non-HVAC system. The degraded controls of HVAC systems may be a main cause of the performance gap.
引用
收藏
页码:1191 / 1204
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] GREEN BUILDINGS IN CHINA - INDICES AND WAYS TO IMPROVE ENERGY-EFFICIENCY IN CHINESE BUILDINGS
    Petretschek, S.
    Zhu, Y.
    Ni, J.
    7TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON HEATING, VENTILATING AND AIR CONDITIONING, PROCEEDINGS OF ISHVAC 2011, VOLS I-IV, 2011, : 89 - 94
  • [32] Impact of Green Roof and Orientation on the Energy Performance of Buildings: A Case Study from Saudi Arabia
    Khan, Hassan Saeed
    Asif, Muhammad
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 9 (04):
  • [33] Development of an evaluation process for green and non-green buildings focused on energy performance of G-SEED and LEED
    Jeong, Jaewook
    Hong, Taehoon
    Ji, Changyoon
    Kim, Jimin
    Lee, Minhyun
    Jeong, Kwangbok
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 105 : 172 - 184
  • [34] Renewable energy options for buildings Case studies
    Rezaie, Behnaz
    Esmailzadeh, Ebrahim
    Dincer, Ibrahim
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2011, 43 (01) : 56 - 65
  • [35] The Building Energy Performance Gap in Multifamily Buildings: A Detailed Case Study Analysis of the Energy Demand and Collective Heating System
    van de Putte, Stijn
    Steeman, Marijke
    Janssens, Arnold
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2025, 17 (01)
  • [36] Energy saving performance of green vegetation on LEED certified buildings
    Feng, H.
    Hewage, K.
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2014, 75 : 281 - 289
  • [37] Influence of green roof systems on the energy performance of buildings and their surroundings
    Balvedi, Nadia
    Giglio, Thalita
    JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2023, 70
  • [38] BIM-based building performance assessment of green buildings- A case study from China
    Liu, Yang
    Pedrycz, Witold
    Deveci, Muhammet
    Chen, Zhen-Song
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2024, 373
  • [39] Evaluation method for green buildings from the perspective of ecological studies
    Sun Yaoqian
    AGRO FOOD INDUSTRY HI-TECH, 2017, 28 (01): : 2041 - 2046
  • [40] Energy consumption level of low-energy buildings among different climate zones in China: Case studies
    Zhang, Ke
    Zhao, Jing
    SUSTAINABLE ENVIRONMENT AND TRANSPORTATION, PTS 1-4, 2012, 178-181 : 20 - 23