EVALUATING TAX AFFAIRS OFFICE PERFORMANCE BY BALANCED SCORECARD (BSC)

被引:0
|
作者
Nazemosadat, Sa. [1 ]
Ghezavati, Hr. [1 ]
Yegane, M. [1 ]
Manteqi, N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Shiraz Islamic Azad Univ, Shiraz, Iran
关键词
strategic management; performance assessment; balanced scorecard;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Tax Affair Organization as a part of the government should be able to be a part of economic justice development and increase the government sustainable incomes by tax collecting from significant economic sectors along with shareholders veneration. In this article the strategies were derived from Iran National Tax Affairs (ITNA) operational program in 2008 and ITNA strategic program. The main strategies were derived with experts' cooperation. The operational objectives and 48 measures related to each operational objective were distinguished. Based on these, the balanced scorecard and questionnaire were designed. The reliability of research tools shows alpha coefficient for each questionnaire is higher than 75%. The data analysis is applied on two levels of descriptive and referential statistics. Research findings show that the general tax affairs organization performance is up to 99% consistent with balanced scorecard. In addition, the performance from the financial, customers and internal processes views are consistent with balanced scorecard. However, the performance is not consistent with the balanced scorecard from development and leaning aspects.
引用
收藏
页码:449 / 453
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Measuring the performance and excellence of academicians through the e-balanced scorecard (e-BSC)
    Hamid, Suraya
    Leen, Yu May
    Pei, Soo Hsaio
    INFORMATION MANAGEMENT IN THE MODERN ORGANIZATIONS: TRENDS & SOLUTIONS, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2008, : 713 - 717
  • [22] Evaluating quantity surveying firms' performance An application of balanced scorecard technique
    Osunsanwo, Hannah Feyisayo
    Dada, Joshua Oluwasuji
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY AND PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT, 2020, 69 (01) : 134 - 152
  • [23] Factors Influencing Balanced Scorecard Application in Evaluating the Performance of Tourist Firms
    Duc Dinh Truong
    Hoan Nguyen
    Thi Quynh Lien Duong
    JOURNAL OF ASIAN FINANCE ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS, 2020, 7 (05): : 217 - 224
  • [24] Evaluating petroleum supply chain performance: Overcoming shortcomings of balanced scorecard
    Varma S.
    Deshmukh S.G.
    Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 2009, 10 (4) : 11 - 22
  • [25] A fuzzy MCDM approach for evaluating banking performance based on Balanced Scorecard
    Wu, Hung-Yi
    Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung
    Chen, Yi-Hsuan
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2009, 36 (06) : 10135 - 10147
  • [26] The survey relationship between office automation and employees performance in the yield tax affairs office
    Azma, Fereydoon
    Izanlou, Ali
    Mostafapour, Mohammad Ali
    FIRST WORLD CONFERENCE ON INNOVATION AND COMPUTER SCIENCES (INSODE 2011), 2012, 1 : 153 - 157
  • [27] Functional fixation and the balanced scorecard Adaption of BSC users' judgment processes
    Schauss, Joachim
    Hirsch, Bernhard
    Sohn, Matthias
    JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING AND ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE, 2014, 10 (04): : 540 - +
  • [28] IMPLEMENTATION OF BALANCED SCORECARD (BSC) IN A MALAYSIAN GLC: PERCEPTIONS OF MIDDLE MANAGERS
    Ayoup, Hazeline
    Omar, Normah Hj
    Rahman, Ibrahim Kamal Abdul
    ASIA-PACIFIC MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING JOURNAL, 2012, 7 (02): : 99 - 126
  • [29] Use of Balanced Scorecard (BSC) Performance Indicators for Small-Scale Hydropower Project Attractiveness Analysis
    Machado, Augusto Cesar Campos de Souza
    Tiago Filho, Geraldo Lucio
    de Abreu, Thiago Modesto
    Facchini, Francesco
    da Silva, Robson Francisco
    Pinto, Luiz Fernando Rodrigues
    ENERGIES, 2023, 16 (18)
  • [30] PROFITABILITY OF COMPANIES THAT USE BALANCED SCORECARD (BSC) VERSUS COMPANIES THAT USE ONLY FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
    Rocha, Irani
    Beuren, Ilse Maria
    Hein, Nelson
    REVISTA ELETRONICA DE ESTRATEGIA E NEGOCIOS-REEN, 2012, 5 (02): : 88 - 119