Gulf war contamination assessment for optimal monitoring and remediation cost-benefit analysis, Kuwait

被引:9
|
作者
Yihdego, Yohannes [1 ]
Al-Weshah, Radwan A. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] SMEC, Sydney, NSW 2060, Australia
[2] Univ Jordan, Dept Civil Engn, Amman, Jordan
[3] Kuwait Environm Remediat Project, Kuwait, Kuwait
关键词
Visualization; Data analysis; Site investigation; Plume; Monitoring; Remediation; Hydrocarbon; Clean-up cost; Pollution; RAUDHATAIN;
D O I
10.1007/s12665-016-6025-3
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Site characterization was performed on an area of 580 km(2) around the strategically vital freshwater aquifers of the Al-Rawdhatain and Umm Al-Aish to assess the status of groundwater pollution as the result of Iraq invasion to Kuwait in 1991. Advanced data analysis and visualization software (EVS-Pro) was used for groundwater contamination assessment analytes: total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) and total dissolved solids (TDS). This will reduce the number of samples needed (saves time and money) and provide a superior assessment of the analytes distribution. Based on the "minimum-maximum plume technology'' analysis, the nominal plume area with a threshold of 0.031 mg/kg TPH is estimated at about 0.47 km 2. This is the difference between the maximum and minimum predicted plume sizes. EVS-Pro also computed 3.3775 x 10(9) and 4.0788 x 10(6) for the plume volumes and masses (dollars per volume and mass), respectively. Also, new sampling locations were determined for further detailed site assessments based on the confidence and uncertainty analysis, which is more defensible and cost-optimized approach. This will reduce the number of samples needed (saves time and money) and provide a superior assessment of the analytes distribution. These tools prove to be effective in assessing remediation costs of clean-up versus benefits obtained and in developing a cost-effective monitoring programme for insights into processes controlling subsurface contaminant transport that impact water quality.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Cost-benefit analysis
    Miura, Grant
    NATURE CHEMICAL BIOLOGY, 2018, 14 (10) : 903 - 903
  • [12] COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS
    BJORNSTAD, P
    KJEMI, 1975, 35 (10): : 3 - 3
  • [13] Ground water contamination in Kuwait resulting from the 1991 Gulf War: A preliminary assessment
    Mukhopadhyay, A.
    Al-Awadi, E.
    Quinn, M.
    Akber, A.
    Al-Senafy, M.
    Rashid, T.
    GROUND WATER MONITORING AND REMEDIATION, 2008, 28 (02): : 81 - 93
  • [14] Cost-benefit of antepartum fetal monitoring
    de Agüero, RG
    Fabre, E
    Tajada, M
    Pérez-Hiraldo, MP
    PERINATAL MEDICINE OF THE NEW MILLENNIUM, 2001, : 1337 - 1340
  • [15] PROBLEMS OF COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS IN OPTIMAL PLANNING - NOVOZHILOV,VV
    ELLMAN, M
    ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1971, 81 (322): : 418 - 419
  • [16] PROBLEMS OF COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS IN OPTIMAL PLANNING - NOVOZHILOV,VV
    LAL, K
    CANADIAN-AMERICAN SLAVIC STUDIES-REVUE CANADIENNE-AMERICAINE D ETUDES SLAVES, 1974, 8 (04): : 611 - 613
  • [17] PROBLEMS OF COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS IN OPTIMAL PLANNING - NOVOZHILOV,VV
    NELL, EJ
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE, 1972, 10 (02) : 462 - 463
  • [18] The optimal size of the European Stability Mechanism: a cost-benefit analysis
    Kapp, Daniel
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2014, 20 (10): : 915 - 933
  • [19] Optimal enlistment age: A cost-benefit analysis and some simulations
    Levy, Amnon
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2007, 180 (01) : 418 - 425
  • [20] COST-BENEFIT ASSESSMENT OF AN ADVERSE DRUG-REACTIONS MONITORING CENTER
    MIGNOT, G
    CHICHMANIAN, RM
    SPREUX, A
    BERNARD, G
    THERAPIE, 1988, 43 (05): : 377 - 378