The interaction of soybean aphids and soybean cyst nematodes on selected resistant and susceptible soybean lines

被引:8
|
作者
Heeren, J. R. [1 ]
Steffey, K. L. [2 ]
Tinsley, N. A. [1 ]
Estes, R. E. [1 ]
Niblack, T. L. [1 ]
Gray, M. E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Crop Sci, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[2] Dow AgroSci LLC, Indianapolis, IN USA
关键词
Aphis glycines Matsumura; Heterodera glycines Ichinohe; HETERODERA-GLYCINES; HEMIPTERA; HOMOPTERA; POPULATIONS; MANAGEMENT; DIVERSITY; DENSITY; GROWTH; YIELD; FIELD;
D O I
10.1111/j.1439-0418.2011.01701.x
中图分类号
Q96 [昆虫学];
学科分类号
摘要
Soybean aphids, Aphis glycines Matsumura, and soybean cyst nematodes, Heterodera glycines Ichinohe, are economic pests of soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr., in the north-central United States. Combined, these pests may account for 20-50% of yield reductions in a soybean crop. Only limited information is available concerning the interaction of these two pests on soybean production. During the summers of 2006 and 2007, we conducted a field-experiment near Urbana, IL, to evaluate the effect of resistant and susceptible soybean lines on the development and reproduction of both pests in combination with each other. We also examined how each pest, as well as their interaction, affected the yield of susceptible and resistant soybean lines. Soybean plants grown within caged plots were infested with soybean aphids and soybean cyst nematodes; cumulative aphid days and soybean cyst nematode egg densities were determined at the end of each growing season. Soybean aphids were able to survive on all four soybean lines in both years of this study; however, aphid-resistant lines generally had fewer cumulative aphid days than aphid-susceptible lines. Likewise, nematode-resistant lines typically had fewer eggs than nematode-susceptible lines. During both years, we failed to observe a significant interaction between these two pests on the reproduction of one another. Yield data from 2006 was inconclusive; however, results from 2007 suggest that yield-loss when soybean aphids and soybean cyst nematodes occur jointly is not significantly greater than when these two pests occur independently. The relationship between these two pests, and our inability to observe an interaction, are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:646 / 655
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] EFFECTS OF MONOCROPPING RESISTANT AND SUSCEPTIBLE SOYBEAN CULTIVARS ON CYST NEMATODE INFESTED SOIL
    HARTWIG, EE
    YOUNG, LD
    BUEHRING, N
    CROP SCIENCE, 1987, 27 (03) : 576 - 579
  • [42] REPRODUCTION OF DIFFERENTIALLY SELECTED SOYBEAN CYST NEMATODE POPULATIONS ON RESISTANT SOYBEANS
    YOUNG, LD
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 1981, 71 (08) : 914 - 914
  • [43] EFFECT OF APHID-TRANSMITTED SOYBEAN MOSAIC-VIRUS ON YIELDS OF CLOSELY RELATED RESISTANT AND SUSCEPTIBLE SOYBEAN LINES
    ROSS, JP
    CROP SCIENCE, 1977, 17 (06) : 869 - 872
  • [45] Soybean cyst nematode and soybean aphid interactions on soybean.
    Avendano, F.
    O'Neal, M. E.
    Tylka, G. L.
    JOURNAL OF NEMATOLOGY, 2007, 39 (01) : 85 - 85
  • [46] Compost application as a sustainable approach to managing soybean cyst nematodes in corn-soybean rotations
    Yazdani, Razieh
    Thapa, S.
    Yaghoubi, A.
    Howland, A. D.
    Quintanilla, M.
    JOURNAL OF NEMATOLOGY, 2023, 55 (01) : 133 - 133
  • [47] Vermiform plant-parasitic nematodes on soybean in North Dakota and their relationship with soybean cyst nematode
    Yan, G.
    Yan, G.
    Plaisance, A.
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 2016, 106 (12) : 104 - 104
  • [48] Soybean Cyst Nematodes of Ohio: Deciphering mechanisms of virulence
    Walsh, E.
    Miller, T.
    Grenell, A.
    Cassone, B.
    Taylor, C.
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 2016, 106 (12) : 38 - 38
  • [49] Engineering resistance against soybean cyst nematodes.
    Huang, X.
    Wiig, A.
    Hill, S.
    Ascenzi, R.
    McCaig, B.
    Liu, Y. S.
    Motyka, S.
    Dong, J.
    Offenheiser, M.
    Puzio, P.
    Talton, L.
    Zhen, R.
    Mittendorf, V.
    JOURNAL OF NEMATOLOGY, 2007, 39 (01) : 100 - 100
  • [50] Soybean cyst nematodes of Ohio: Deciphering mechanisms of virulence
    Walsh, E.
    Cassone, B.
    Grenell, A.
    Miller, T.
    Taylor, C. G.
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 2015, 105 (11) : 144 - 144