Exploring Technology Integration in Education using Fuzzy Representation and Feature Selection

被引:0
|
作者
Yang, Jie [1 ]
Ma, Jun [1 ]
Howard, Sarah K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wollongong, Fac Engn & Informat Sci, SMART Infrastruct Facil, Northfields Ave, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
[2] Univ Wollongong, Fac Social Sci, Sch Educ, Northfields Ave, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
来源
2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUZZY SYSTEMS (FUZZ-IEEE) | 2016年
关键词
RECOVERY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Digital technology integration in schools and what this means for teaching and learning plays an significant role in shaping the education environment. There has been a growing body of literature addressing students' perceptions towards technology integration. A large amount of student and teacher self-reported questionnaire or survey data therefore has been collected for different modelling purposes. Yet, considerable questions are still remaining due to this huge-volume, diversified and uncertain survey data. This paper demonstrates the use of fuzzy representation and feature selection to discover unique patterns via survey data. More precisely, fuzzy representation is used to quantify survey response and reform response using linguistic expression. Furthermore, a novel feature selection algorithm is applied to identify important features. This proposed algorithm, based on the sparse representation model, selects features that minimize the residual output error iteratively, thus the resulting features have a direct correspondence to the given problem. The efficiency of the proposed work is evaluated using a state-level student survey. The employed dataset (N = 8528) is used to discover unique patterns among computer efficacy, engagement and school engagement. Experimental results show that the proposed algorithm outperforms traditional approaches.
引用
收藏
页码:1288 / 1293
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Linguistic Representation by Fuzzy Formal Concept and Interval Type-2 Feature Selection
    Cherif, Sahar
    Baklouti, Nesrine
    Alimi, Adel M.
    Snasel, Vaclav
    INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS DESIGN AND APPLICATIONS (ISDA 2016), 2017, 557 : 1071 - 1081
  • [22] Fuzzy criteria for feature selection
    Vieira, Susana M.
    Sousa, Joao M. C.
    Kaymak, Uzay
    FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2012, 189 (01) : 1 - 18
  • [23] Incremental feature weighting for fuzzy feature selection
    Wang, Ling
    Meng, Jianyao
    Huang, Ruixia
    Zhu, Hui
    Peng, Kaixiang
    FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2019, 368 : 1 - 19
  • [24] FEATURE SELECTION WITH FUZZY CONSTRAINT
    DIDAY, E
    COMPTES RENDUS HEBDOMADAIRES DES SEANCES DE L ACADEMIE DES SCIENCES SERIE A, 1975, 281 (21): : 925 - 927
  • [25] Feature Weighting and Feature Selection in Fuzzy Clustering
    Borgelt, Christian
    2008 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUZZY SYSTEMS, VOLS 1-5, 2008, : 838 - 844
  • [26] Exploring feelings about technology integration in higher education Individuation and congruence
    Risquez, Angelica
    Moore, Sarah
    JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE MANAGEMENT, 2013, 26 (02) : 326 - 339
  • [27] Feature selection for fuzzy classifier using the spider monkey algorithm
    Hodashinsky, Ilya A.
    Nemirovich-Danchenko, Mikhail M.
    Samsonov, Sergey S.
    BIZNES INFORMATIKA-BUSINESS INFORMATICS, 2019, 13 (02): : 29 - 42
  • [28] Fuzzy Rough Based Feature Selection by Using Random Sampling
    Wang Zhenlei
    Zhao Suyun
    Liu Yangming
    Chen Hong
    Li Cuiping
    Sun Xiran
    PRICAI 2018: TRENDS IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, PT II, 2018, 11013 : 91 - 99
  • [29] Simultaneous Feature Selection and Extraction Using Fuzzy Rough Sets
    Maji, Pradipta
    Garai, Partha
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE SECOND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFT COMPUTING FOR PROBLEM SOLVING (SOCPROS 2012), 2014, 236 : 115 - 123
  • [30] Using Fuzzy Rough Feature Selection for Image Retrieval System
    Lotfabadi, Maryam Shahabi
    Shiratuddin, Mohd Fairuz
    Wong, Kok Wai
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2013 IEEE SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE FOR MULTIMEDIA, SIGNAL AND VISION PROCESSING (CIMSIVP), 2013, : 42 - 48