共 50 条
Epigenetic Potential in Native and Introduced Populations of House Sparrows (Passer domesticus)
被引:14
|作者:
Hanson, Haley E.
[1
]
Koussayer, Bilal
[1
]
Kilvitis, Holly J.
[2
]
Schrey, Aaron W.
[3
]
Maddox, J. Dylan
[4
,5
,6
]
Martin, Lynn B.
[1
]
机构:
[1] Univ S Florida, Global & Planetary Hlth, 3720 Spectrum Blvd,Suite 304, Tampa, FL 33620 USA
[2] Univ S Florida, Dept Integrat Biol, 4202 E Fowler Ave,SCA110, Tampa, FL 33620 USA
[3] Georgia Southern Univ, Dept Biol, Armstrong Campus,11935 Abercorn St,SC1010, Savannah, SC 31419 USA
[4] Field Museum Nat Hist, 1400 S Lake Shore Dr, Chicago, IL 60605 USA
[5] Univ Cient Peru, Lab Biotecnol & Bioenerget, Iquitos, Peru
[6] Amer Publ Univ Syst, Environm Sci, Charles Town, WV 25414 USA
基金:
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词:
RANGE EXPANSION;
PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY;
DNA METHYLATION;
CPG ISLAND;
KAPPA-B;
EVOLUTION;
EXPRESSION;
IMMUNITY;
PATTERNS;
GENE;
D O I:
10.1093/icb/icaa060
中图分类号:
Q95 [动物学];
学科分类号:
071002 ;
摘要:
Epigenetic potential, defined as the capacity for epigenetically-mediated phenotypic plasticity, may play an important role during range expansions. During range expansions, populations may encounter relatively novel challenges while experiencing lower genetic diversity. Phenotypic plasticity via epigenetic potential might be selectively advantageous at the time of initial introduction or during spread into new areas, enabling introduced organisms to cope rapidly with novel challenges. Here, we asked whether one form of epigenetic potential (i.e., the abundance of CpG sites) in three microbial surveillance genes: Toll-like receptors (TLRs) 1B (TLR1B), 2A (TLR2A), and 4 (TLR4) varied between native and introduced house sparrows (Passer domesticus). Using an opportunistic approach based on samples collected from sparrow populations around the world, we found that introduced birds had more CpG sites in TLR2A and TLR4, but not TLRIB, than native ones. Introduced birds also lost more CpG sites in TLRIB, gained more CpG sites in TLR2A, and lost fewer CpG sites in TLR4 compared to native birds. These results were not driven by differences in genetic diversity or population genetic structure, and many CpG sites fell within predicted transcription factor binding sites (TFBS), with losses and gains of CpG sites altering predicted TFBS. Although we lacked statistical power to conduct the most rigorous possible analyses, these results suggest that epigenetic potential may play a role in house sparrow range expansions, but additional work will be critical to elucidating how epigenetic potential affects gene expression and hence phenotypic plasticity at the individual, population, and species levels.
引用
收藏
页码:1458 / 1468
页数:11
相关论文