Board Structure and Firm Performance: Evidence from India's Top Companies

被引:419
|
作者
Jackling, Beverley [1 ]
Johl, Shireenjit [2 ]
机构
[1] Victoria Univ, Fac Business & Law, Melbourne, Vic 3000, Australia
[2] Deakin Univ, Sch Accounting Econ & Finance, Burwood, Vic 3125, Australia
关键词
Corporate Governance; Board of Directors; Firm Performance; Clause; 49; India; CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; INVESTOR PROTECTION; DIRECTORS; OWNERSHIP; IMPACT; AGENCY; MARKET; CEO; INDEPENDENCE; DETERMINANTS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00760.x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Manuscript Type: Empirical Research Question/Issue: This paper investigates the relationship between internal governance structures and financial performance of Indian companies. The effectiveness of boards of directors, including board composition, board size, and aspects of board leadership including duality and board busyness are addressed in the Indian context using two theories of corporate governance: agency theory and resource dependency theory. Research Findings/Insights: The study used a sample of top Indian companies taking into account the endogeneity of the relationships among corporate governance, corporate performance, and corporate capital structure. The study provides some support for aspects of agency theory as a greater proportion of outside directors on boards were associated with improved firm performance. The notion of separating leadership roles in a manner consistent with agency theory was not supported. For instance, the notion that powerful CEOs (duality role, CEO being the promoter, and CEO being the only board manager) have a detrimental effect on performance was not supported. There was some support for resource dependency theory. The findings suggest that larger board size has a positive impact on performance thus supporting the view that greater exposure to the external environment improves access to various resources and thus positively impacts on performance. The study however failed to support the resource dependency theory in terms of the association between frequency of board meetings and performance. Similarly the results showed that outside directors with multiple appointments appeared to have a negative effect on performance, suggesting that "busyness" did not add value in terms of networks and enhancement of resource accessibility. Theoretical/Academic Implications: The two theories of corporate governance, namely agency and resource dependence theory, were each only partially supported, by the findings of this study. The findings add further to the view that no single theory explains the nexus between corporate governance and performance. Practitioner/Policy Implications: This study demonstrates that corporate governance measures utilized in developed economies related to boards of directors have some synergies and relevance to emerging economies, such as India. However, the nature of business structures in India, for example the large number of family businesses, may limit the generalizability of the findings and signals the need for further investigation of these businesses. The evidence related to multiple appointments of directors suggests that there may be support for restricting the number of directorships held by any one individual in emerging economies, given that the "busyness" of directors was negatively associated with firm performance.
引用
收藏
页码:492 / 509
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Controlling shareholders, board structure, and firm performance: Evidence from India
    Jameson, Melvin
    Prevost, Andrew
    Puthenpurackal, John
    JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2014, 27 : 1 - 20
  • [2] Board composition and firm performance: empirical evidence from Indian companies
    Goel, Archana
    Dhiman, Rahul
    Rana, Sudhir
    Srivastava, Vimal
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, 2022, 14 (04) : 771 - 789
  • [3] The board of directors and firm performance: empirical evidence from listed companies
    Merendino, Alessandro
    Melville, Rob
    CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS IN SOCIETY, 2019, 19 (03): : 508 - 551
  • [4] Board gender diversity and firm performance: evidence from India
    Sanan N.K.
    Asian Journal of Business Ethics, 2016, 5 (1-2) : 1 - 18
  • [5] Does Firm Performance Impact Top-Level Executive Compensation in ESG Companies? Evidence from India
    Rath, Chetna
    Deo, Malabika
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING AND GOVERNANCE, 2021, 15
  • [6] Women on management board and firm performance: Evidence from the Visegrad Group companies
    Bukalska, Elzbieta
    Sosnowski, Tomasz
    Wawryszuk-Misztal, Anna
    ENTREPRENEURIAL BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS REVIEW, 2024, 12 (02) : 43 - 59
  • [7] Impact of Firm Performance on Board Characteristics: Empirical Evidence from India
    Arora, Akshita
    Sharma, Chandan
    IIM KOZHIKODE SOCIETY & MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2015, 4 (01) : 53 - 70
  • [8] Board meeting, promoter CEO and firm performance: Evidence from India
    Sahoo, Minati
    Srivastava, Kailash B. L.
    Gupta, Neeraj
    Mittal, Sachin Kumar
    Bakhshi, Priti
    Agarwal, Tarun
    COGENT ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2023, 11 (01):
  • [9] Impact of board structure, board activities and institutional investors on the firm risk: evidence from India
    Chaudhary, Pankaj
    MANAGERIAL FINANCE, 2021, 47 (04) : 506 - 524
  • [10] Board Characteristics and Firm Performance: Evidence from 65 Media Listed Companies in China
    Zhang, Na
    Ju, Xinyu
    Tian, Xiaowei
    Zhang, Hongbo
    2018 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS SYSTEM AND INDUSTRIAL SECURITY ENGINEERING (IEIS 2018), 2018,