Multi-criteria decision making on succesfull of online learning using AHP and regression

被引:4
|
作者
Fitriastuti, Fatsyahrina [1 ]
Rahmalisa, Uci [2 ]
Girsang, Abba Suganda [3 ]
机构
[1] Janabadra Univ, Dept Informat Engn, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
[2] STMIK Hang Tuah, Dept Informat Engn, Pekan Baru, Indonesia
[3] Bina Nusantara Univ, BINUS Grad Program Master Comp Sci, Comp Sci Dept, Jakarta 11480, Indonesia
关键词
D O I
10.1088/1742-6596/1175/1/012071
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
This paper purposes comparing the view of system builder (expert system) using analitycal hierarchy process (AHP) and view of user (students) using regression method in elearning system STIKes-STMIK Hang Tuah Pekanbaru. This study uses some attributes to analyze and evaluate which affect the acceptance of elearning system success. In AHP, the attributes are categorized as criteria and grouped into some dimensions. These criteria and dimenssions are evaluated by some experts using analitycal hierarchy process (AHP) to assess priorities for elearning system. There are four dimensions, system quality (four criteria), learning information quality (three criteria), service quality (three criteria) and service support (three criteria) dimension. This system is also evaluated by filling out the questionnaire by students as user of elearning system using regression method. The attributes are used as independent variable, while the succesfull of elearning is dependent variable. The result of using AHP and regression system has a different. It also can show there are different view between users and system builder which should be considered by STIKes-STMIK Hang Tuah Pekanbaru.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Multi-criteria decision making for nuclear power plant selection using fuzzy AHP: Evidence from Indonesia
    Abdullah, Ade Gafar
    Shafii, Mohammad Ali
    Pramuditya, Syeilendra
    Setiadipura, Topan
    Anzhar, Kurnia
    ENERGY AND AI, 2023, 14
  • [32] QoE-Based Multi-Criteria Decision Making for Resource Provisioning in Fog Computing Using AHP Technique
    Varshney, Shefali
    Sandhu, Rajinder
    Gupta, P. K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE AND SYSTEMS SCIENCE, 2020, 11 (04) : 17 - 30
  • [33] A multi-criteria decision-making approach for portfolio selection by using an automatic spherical fuzzy AHP algorithm
    Jawad, Muhammad
    Naz, Munazza
    Muqaddus, Haseena
    JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2024, 75 (01) : 85 - 98
  • [34] Trust Blog Ranking Using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis AHP and TOPSIS
    Zulkefli, Nurul Akhmal Binti Mohd
    Bin Baharudin, Baharum
    Said, Abas Bin Md
    IT CONVERGENCE AND SECURITY 2017, VOL 2, 2018, 450 : 68 - 76
  • [35] Structure of multi-criteria decision-making
    Brugha, C
    JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2004, 55 (11) : 1156 - 1168
  • [36] Multi-Criteria Decision Making with Skyline Computation
    Choi, Wonik
    Liu, Ling
    Yu, Boseon
    2012 IEEE 13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION REUSE AND INTEGRATION (IRI), 2012, : 316 - 323
  • [37] SYSTEMATIC DECISION MAKING: A EXTENDED MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING MODEL
    Yu, Xiaohan
    Xu, Zeshui
    Hu, Junquan
    Liu, Shousheng
    TECHNOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMY, 2017, 23 (01) : 157 - 177
  • [38] Methodological foundations of multi-criteria decision making
    Ogryczak, W
    Vetschera, R
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2004, 158 (02) : 267 - 270
  • [39] Semantic Multi-Criteria Decision Making SeMCDM
    Mahmoudi, Ghadi
    Mueller-Schloer, Christian
    MCDM: 2009 IEEE SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE IN MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING, 2009, : 149 - 156
  • [40] Mutually Dependent Multi-criteria Decision Making
    Dalalah, Doraid
    Al-Tahat, Mohammad
    Bataineh, Khaled
    FUZZY INFORMATION AND ENGINEERING, 2012, 4 (02) : 195 - 216