Health technology assessment: principles, methods and current status

被引:7
|
作者
Giovagnoni, A. [1 ]
Bartolucci, L. [1 ]
Manna, A. [1 ]
Morbiducci, J. [1 ]
Ascoli, G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Marche, Az Osped Riuniti, Dipartimento Radiol, I-60020 Ancona, Italy
来源
RADIOLOGIA MEDICA | 2009年 / 114卷 / 05期
关键词
Health technology assessment; Clinical efficacy of diagnostic procedures; Evidence based medicine (EBM); Health policy; CLINICAL EFFICACY; RADIOLOGY;
D O I
10.1007/s11547-009-00387-5
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
This paper analyses the methodological and technical aspects of health technology assessment (HTA) as a tool for evaluating health technologies and procedures, with special reference to diagnostic imaging; describes the main experiences with HTA at the international and national level; outlines the most important HTA projects in Italy, and analyses the effects of HTA on health care strategies and policies. The work was carried out in three phases. In the first phase, the authors analysed the principles, methods and instruments of HTA; in the second, they evaluated the current status of HTA in different countries; and in the third, they defined the impact of HTA on the decision-making process in health care. Since the 1970s, technological innovation has been accompanied by the development of methods for the multidisciplinary assessment of the technical, scientific, economic, ethical and social aspects inherent in the use of new technologies. The method is implemented at an international level by a network of public and private bodies that carry out HTA in support of health care policies. Because the application of HTA is still in its early stages in Italy, it is necessary to promote its development by drawing on consolidated international experiences.
引用
收藏
页码:673 / 691
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Health Technology Assessment: principles, dimensions and tools
    Descovich, Carlo
    Siena, Annunziata
    ITALIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2010, 4 (03) : 212 - 213
  • [22] Are Key Principles for improved health technology assessment supported and used by health technology assessment organizations?
    Neumann, Peter J.
    Drummond, Michael F.
    Joensson, Bengt
    Luce, Bryan R.
    Schwartz, J. Sanford
    Siebert, Uwe
    Sullivan, Sean D.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2010, 26 (01) : 71 - 78
  • [23] PRINCIPLES AND METHODS OF ASSESSMENT OF ACHIEVEMENT IN HEALTH POLICIES
    PFLANZ, M
    OFFENTLICHE GESUNDHEITSWESEN, 1974, 36 (08): : 537 - 544
  • [24] HEALTH TECHNOLOGY REASSESSMENT IN TAIWAN - CURRENT STATUS
    Hy, Tsai
    Li, Ying H.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2023, 26 (06) : S223 - S223
  • [25] HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT ROADMAP FOR UKRAINE - THE PERSPECTIVE OF STAKHOLDERS ON CURRENT STATUS AND FUTURE OPPORTUNITIES
    Csanadi, M.
    Inotai, A.
    Nemeth, B.
    Oleshchuk, O.
    Lebega, O.
    Brodovskaya, A.
    Piniazhko, O.
    Kalo, Z.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2018, 21 : S201 - S201
  • [26] INTEGRATING HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT PRINCIPLES IN FORMULARY MANAGEMENT
    Teng, Monica
    Khoo, Ai Leng
    Zhao, Ying Jiao
    Lin, Liang
    Lim, Boon Peng
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2016, 32 (1-2) : 81 - 87
  • [27] Environmental impact assessment in health technology assessment: principles, approaches, and challenges
    Toolan, Michael
    Walpole, Sarah
    Shah, Koonal
    Kenny, Juliet
    Jonsson, Pall
    Crabb, Nick
    Greaves, Felix
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2023, 39 (01)
  • [28] Health technology assessment review: Remote monitoring of vital signs - current status and future challenges
    Nangalia, Vishal
    Prytherch, David R.
    Smith, Gary B.
    CRITICAL CARE, 2010, 14 (05):
  • [29] Health technology assessment review: Remote monitoring of vital signs - current status and future challenges
    Vishal Nangalia
    David R Prytherch
    Gary B Smith
    Critical Care, 14